I like it!
Le 27 juil. 2013 04:24, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com a
écrit :
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jul 26, 2013, at 19:24, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com
wrote:
Perhaps an event listener for all dbcp events? Then
I think we need to re-think the stubbing support in proxy2. I'm not saying I
don't like the idea. What I propose is that we introduce some lower-level
abstractions on which the stubbing is built. For instance, I would propose we
introduce a couple of interfaces (or the concept of these
Hi
Isnt it a particular kind of interceptor/handler (CompositeInterceptor)? So
does it need so much details?
Le 27 juil. 2013 15:31, James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com a
écrit :
I think we need to re-think the stubbing support in proxy2. I'm not
saying I don't like the idea. What I
Hi
On a mail on [monitoring] i put some point on proxy. The main question was
shouldnt proxy give a default impl of proxying instead of being a facade
(which needs to put all impl specifities in the api or a way to get them)?
In tomee/openejb and owb we use asm to create proxies and
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Isnt it a particular kind of interceptor/handler (CompositeInterceptor)? So
does it need so much details?
Well, the idea behind stubbing is that we would be specifying
behavior for very specific method
While I get what you're saying, that's kind of the entire reason
Commons Proxy was created. Proxy came about from my experience with
Apache HiveMind and Javassist. We were constantly doing Javassist
coding each time we wanted new proxying logic. There was a LOT of
repeated code because of all
Once ill have done the monitoring stuff ill try to work on it.
Le 27 juil. 2013 16:06, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com a
écrit :
While I get what you're saying, that's kind of the entire reason
Commons Proxy was created. Proxy came about from my experience with
Apache HiveMind and
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Once ill have done the monitoring stuff ill try to work on it.
What would be really cool is to have a smackdown once we get ASM
into the mix to see which one performs the best and exactly how fast
they are compared
I have created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROXY-20
to track the progress of this issue. I have already checked in some
code into the branch.
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 9:54 AM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
Hehe, we benched in owb but lets wait the porting ;)
Le 27 juil. 2013 16:49, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com a
écrit :
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Once ill have done the monitoring stuff ill try to work on it.
What would be
As I had mentioned, support for some form of dynamic response was the last
feature I had wanted to get into the stub module, so I am certainly not
opposed to this. I had simply thought to eat dog food by using [functor]
interfaces, but that's not a big deal. I have not yet reviewed your latest
AFAIK Mark Struberg's work on the OWB proxies could be instructive, and
since I've just spent several weeks in ASM hell I might just be a bit of
use there myself. The only thing is, isn't cglib built on ASM as well? The
dynamic nature of the various proxy helpers means that we probably couldn't
I do not plan on making us lose anything. What I am looking for is to
build layers of abstraction. The stuff you have developed right now I
would probably point at the lower-level abstractions that I'm writing
currently. Does that make sense?
On Saturday, July 27, 2013, Matt Benson wrote:
As
Yep, thanks. ;-)
On Jul 27, 2013 1:36 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I do not plan on making us lose anything. What I am looking for is to
build layers of abstraction. The stuff you have developed right now I
would probably point at the lower-level abstractions that I'm
Cglib is almost dead if i'm right, javassist is alive but not that stable
and owb is faster ATM and at least would bring an Apache impl adapted to
[proxy].
Note: the fact to be able to reuse InvocationHandler and not a new API is
great too
Le 27 juil. 2013 20:13, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com
15 matches
Mail list logo
