Hello Fuxiang,
thanks for your interest in Apache Commons Email.
I don't see a reason to add the add a null check here. We're talking about
a test class and we know that the VALID_EMAILS array will never be null.
Adding a null check just clutters the test code and makes it harder to
understand.
The Apache Commons Team is pleased to announce the release of Apache
Commons DbUtils 1.6.
The Commons DbUtils library is a small set of classes designed to make
working with JDBC easier. JDBC resource cleanup code is mundane, error
prone work so these classes abstract out all of the cleanup tasks
Dear Developers,
We are a team of researchers from the Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology (HKUST). Currently, we are studying how crowdsourcing can help
developers to build a higher quality software.
One of the subjects that we used is Apache Commons Email. From our
experiment, we ide
Dear Developers,
We are a team of researchers from the Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology (HKUST). Currently, we are studying how crowdsourcing can help
developers to build a higher quality software.
One of the subjects that we used is Apache Commons Math. From our
experiment, we iden
Le 20/07/2014 22:35, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
> Okay, but we can agree upon "allow missing column names" instead of "ignore
> empty headers"?
I'm ok for "allow missing column names" or "missing column names allowed".
Emmanuel Bourg
-
Okay, but we can agree upon "allow missing column names" instead of "ignore
empty headers"?
I'll have some time to incorporate the suggestions of this thread and the other
into trunk tomorrow evening. We'll see how that feels like.
Benedikt
Send from my mobile device
> Am 20.07.2014 um 14:10
I see no reason to treat dbcp special wrt JavaDoc. I'm fine with changing the
links.
Benedikt
Send from my mobile device
> Am 20.07.2014 um 20:57 schrieb Gary Gregory :
>
> Javadoc 8 blows up left and right for this component, and I do not see
> complaints about *link.
>
> Gary
>
>
>> On Su
Javadoc 8 blows up left and right for this component, and I do not see
complaints about *link.
Gary
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Try to build that with Java 8... it will tell you whether that's valid ;-)
>
>
> 2014-07-20 8:26 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory :
>
> > Is there
Looks great! I would not bother with tabs unless if feels it is necessary.
Gary
Original message From: Benedikt Ritter
Date:07/20/2014 12:54 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [parent] publish version 35?
Here is what I have currently:
http://people.apa
Here is what I have currently:
http://people.apache.org/~britter/lang-with-coords/download_lang.html
How do you like it so far?
Depending on how much spare time I have next week, it'll take another week
to get the tabs in place. I have committed my changes to the build plugin,
so others can help o
On 7/20/14, 7:54 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 7/19/14, 5:45 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> I just had a case today actually, where I had to unroll PoolUtils.prefill
>> and add logging before each call to addObject().
> Why?
>
> Nine times out of ten, when you think you need logging when using
> [pool],
On 7/19/14, 5:45 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I just had a case today actually, where I had to unroll PoolUtils.prefill
> and add logging before each call to addObject().
Why?
Nine times out of ten, when you think you need logging when using
[pool], you can get what you need by instrumenting *your*
"Is allowing property x" sounds awful to me. The following would be acceptable:
- is property x allowed
- is property x enabled
- is property x on/off
- is property - in some cases like isActive, isEnabled, is closed
Gary
Original message From: Benedikt Ritter
Date:07/20/2014
I like using all "get" methods and no "is" methods. It is simpler and makes the
getters easier to access as a group with code completion IMO. The with methods
do not behave like Java bean method so I do not thing we need to worry about
that. Unless we want to register immutability...
Gary
I think we can wait. What is your time frame?
Gary
Original message From: Benedikt Ritter
Date:07/20/2014 04:00 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [parent] publish version 35?
hm... I'll need some more time to finish the changes in the build plugin.
If
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/commons-validator/pull/1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Try to build that with Java 8... it will tell you whether that's valid ;-)
2014-07-20 8:26 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory :
> Is there something special being done with the funky format for Javadocs
> that look like "{*link Foo}" as opposed to "{@link Foo}"?
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gm
Any thoughts about this? I still think isAllowingEmptyColumnNames() is a
good name. :)
Benedikt
Hi,
this vote passes with the following binding +1 votes:
- Gary Gregory
- Oliver Heger
- Benedikt Ritter
thanks to all who reviewed this RC. I'll promote the artifacts now.
Benedikt
2014-07-16 21:52 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter :
> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant en
using "get" for methods that return booleans is very uncommon imho...
how about leaving all the gramme stuff out and use:
void withSkipEmptyHeaders(boolean)
boolean isSkipEmptyHeaders
that would
- restore symmetry between getter and setter
- almost follow JavaBean conventions (except for the "wi
hm... I'll need some more time to finish the changes in the build plugin.
If you need the changes in CP 35, go for it. I can release CP 36 when I'm
finished with the build plugin.
br,
Benedikt
2014-07-20 6:34 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory :
> Any thoughts on publishing it?
>
> Gary
>
> --
> E-Mail: ga
21 matches
Mail list logo
