Re: [ANN] Apache Commons IO 2.5 Released

2016-04-21 Thread Gary Gregory
It's not on Central yet for example: http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22commons-io%22%20AND%20a%3A%22commons-io%22 G On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:34 PM, sebb wrote: > > The announce message should not be sent until a day o

RE: [CRYPTO] Git repository requested

2016-04-21 Thread Chen, Haifeng
Thanks Benedikt and Gary. Will check that and get into our planning and documentation. Regards, Haifeng -Original Message- From: Gary Gregory [mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 11:44 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] Git repository requeste

Re: [ANN] Apache Commons IO 2.5 Released

2016-04-21 Thread Benson Margulies
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:34 PM, sebb wrote: > The announce message should not be sent until a day or so after the > artifacts have been published in order to give time for the mirrors to > catch up. > > At that point the site can be updated, the announce sent, and older > versions removed. > > Ot

Re: [ANN] Apache Commons IO 2.5 Released

2016-04-21 Thread sebb
The announce message should not be sent until a day or so after the artifacts have been published in order to give time for the mirrors to catch up. At that point the site can be updated, the announce sent, and older versions removed. Otherwise some users will get 404s This should be explained i

[ANN] Apache Commons IO 2.5 Released

2016-04-21 Thread Benson Margulies
Commons IO is a Java library of utilities to assist with developing IO functionality. Release notes for version 2.5 are at https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-io/upgradeto2_5.html. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release commons-io 2.5 based on RC4

2016-04-21 Thread Benson Margulies
This vote passes, with +1 votes from Gary Gregory Oliver Heger Emmanuel Bourg and no other votes that I observed. On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 14/04/2016 17:41, Benson Margulies a écrit : > >> [X] +1 Release these artifacts > > Tested on Debian with OpenJDK 8.

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-io 2.5 based on RC4

2016-04-21 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 14/04/2016 17:41, Benson Margulies a écrit : > [X] +1 Release these artifacts Tested on Debian with OpenJDK 8. The API changes look ok. Emmanuel Bourg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-io 2.5 based on RC4

2016-04-21 Thread Jörg Schaible
What happened with this vote now? Benson Margulies wrote: > Commons-io 2.5 is offered for a release vote. [snip] > Please review the release candidate and vote. > This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. after > 0400 GMT 31-March 2010 No chance to vote before this da

Re: [CRYPTO] Git repository requested

2016-04-21 Thread Gary Gregory
FYI: Commons Daemon releases native parts. Gary On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Nice work everybody! I'll start working on the site build (maybe tomorrow). > After we have published the website, we can write an announcement to invite > everybody to participate in the

Re: [Math] Clarification of development model with Git

2016-04-21 Thread Gilles
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 09:34:23 +0200, luc wrote: Le 2016-04-21 02:39, Gilles a écrit : On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:14:33 +0100, sebb wrote: On 20 April 2016 at 02:55, Gilles wrote: Hello. Let's assume the following: * Some feature branch has been pushed to the Apache repository. * That branch fixes

Re: [ALL] Dist layout change to per version directories

2016-04-21 Thread sebb
On 18 April 2016 at 10:43, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > Ah - as long as the INFRA and Mirror guys are OK with the potentially > extra 500 MB then that sounds good! > > I've raised > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11702 > to enquire how we should best do it. > > I don't thiink it help

Re: [Math] Clarification of development model with Git

2016-04-21 Thread luc
Le 2016-04-21 02:39, Gilles a écrit : On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:14:33 +0100, sebb wrote: On 20 April 2016 at 02:55, Gilles wrote: Hello. Let's assume the following: * Some feature branch has been pushed to the Apache repository. * That branch fixes an issue reported in JIRA. Has the JIRA been