Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Imaging 1.0-alpha1 based on RC2

>The release notes says that version 1.0 was released 24 November 2013. >Should be updated? Oh, mea culpa. That slipped me. Not sure whether we also need 1.0-alpha1 or simply 1.0 is OK (if the former, then I think we would have to double-check the rest of the docs for other entries like that). Ch

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Imaging 1.0-alpha1 based on RC2

I am canceling this VOTE due to problems building the release candidate. I am going overseas in one month, and also have some releases at $work and one language exam in the coming days. So I won't be able to roll another release in 2018. Hopefully will be able to catch up somewhere in 2019.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Imaging 1.0-alpha1 based on RC2

That's funny, I ran the release process, and had been running `mvn clean test` with each pull request... but now `mvn clean test` is failing on the current working dir (pointing to the tag in git). Will cancel the vote. Thanks Bruno From: Gary Gregory To: Co

Re: [numbers] Making fractions VALJOs

On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 17:00:19 -0700, Eric Barnhill wrote: Second question, is there any reason not to use syntactic sugar for distinctions between "multiply" and " multpliedBy"? With the former being the suger, if the latter is a better standard. Statement needs some reference before we embark

Re: [numbers] Making fractions VALJOs

On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 16:57:43 -0700, Eric Barnhill wrote: On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 1:52 AM Stephen Colebourne wrote: The order of the static constants is also strange - I'm sure a more logical order could be chosen. I have rearranged the constants into the order 0, 1, 1/2, 1/3, 2/3, 1/4, 3

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Imaging 1.0-alpha1 based on RC2

On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 9:32 AM Gary Gregory wrote: > When I run the build on Java 8, I get Javadoc errors and using > -P jdk8-javadoc does not seem to turn doclint off. Can anyone get the build > to work on Java 8? > -1 due to failure of 'mvn apache-rat:check': 4 Unknown Licenses *

Re: [VFS] Java 8

+1 On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 at 07:55, Gary Gregory wrote: > > I propose we update the Java requirement for [vfs] from Java 7 to Java 8. > > Gary -- Eitan Adler - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additi

[VFS] Java 8

I propose we update the Java requirement for [vfs] from Java 7 to Java 8. Gary

Re: [vfs] new http4 provider, not replace http?

Thanks Woonsan! I applied the patch. Gary On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 11:49 PM Woonsan Ko wrote: > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 11:16 AM Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 9:02 AM Woonsan Ko wrote: > > > > > Hi Gary, > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 9:54 PM Gary Gregory > > > wrote: