Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

On 2021-04-18, Fabian Meumertzheim wrote: > Stefan, if you agree, I would submit the two PRs tomorrow and ask you > to sign them off on GitHub via a comment on the PR and a link to this > email thread. Fine with me. Thank you Stefan ---

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

On 2021-04-18, Fabian Meumertzheim wrote: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 6:22 PM Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> Can probably do, what is the duty of a primary contact? My github >> username is bodewig. > The primary contact may be asked to sign off on PRs to that project in > the OSS-Fuzz repo, in particul

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

On 2021-04-18, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21741 if you > want to lend a hand moderating, you may want to add yourself to the > ticket before the list is created. The list has been created, so if you want to receive the fuzz reports please subs

Re: [Vote] Create a "machine learning" component

Hi >Isn't a GA inherently parallel? >If so, why not take advantage of the concurrency tools provided by the JDK? -- Are we planning to implement multi-threading for GA operations even as part of a single population or only for multi-population parallel GA. -- We can implement different types o

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

Thank you Stefan! Bruno On Monday, 19 April 2021, 4:22:18 am NZST, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-04-18, Fabian Meumertzheim wrote: > Anyone who is (or wants to be) a moderator on that list and has a Google > account, please let me know the primary email address so that I can add it

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

Hi Fabian, Yes, please: brunodepaulak at gmail Thanks! Bruno On Monday, 19 April 2021, 7:36:42 am NZST, Fabian Meumertzheim wrote: I have prepared the integrations at https://github.com/CodeIntelligenceTesting/oss-fuzz/tree/commons-compress and https://github.com/CodeIntelligenceTest

Re: Redesign of Commons website generation (was: CMS Deprecated. Removal of configs and move to new publishing area)

On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 18:40, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le dim. 18 avr. 2021 à 15:38, sebb a écrit : > > > > On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 13:40, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > > > Note that git also has its gitlink and sub modules features that we could > > > use here. > > > > Are they easy to use? > >

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

I have prepared the integrations at https://github.com/CodeIntelligenceTesting/oss-fuzz/tree/commons-compress and https://github.com/CodeIntelligenceTesting/oss-fuzz/tree/commons-imaging. I have included Matt's Google account in the auto_ccs list for both, so you will have access to the full report

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 6:22 PM Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Can probably do, what is the duty of a primary contact? My github > username is bodewig. The primary contact may be asked to sign off on PRs to that project in the OSS-Fuzz repo, in particular if someone needs to be added to the "auto_ccs" l

Re: Redesign of Commons website generation (was: CMS Deprecated. Removal of configs and move to new publishing area)

Le dim. 18 avr. 2021 à 15:38, sebb a écrit : > > On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 13:40, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > Note that git also has its gitlink and sub modules features that we could > > use here. > > Are they easy to use? > Who is going to design and test the replacement? > Will such a design real

Re: Redesign of Commons website generation (was: CMS Deprecated. Removal of configs and move to new publishing area)

> On Apr 18, 2021, at 6:38 AM, sebb wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 13:40, Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> Note that git also has its gitlink and sub modules features that we could >> use here. > > Are they easy to use? Submodules are documented at https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Sub

[geometry] GEOMETRY-95 Tutorial

Hello, FYI, I've posted the solid geometry tutorial for GEOMETRY-95 to https://home.apache.org/~mattjuntunen/solid-geometry-tutorial/tutorials/teapot.html if anyone wants to review it. The code is in the PR here: https://github.com/apache/commons-geometry/pull/150. Regards, Matt J

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

On 2021-04-18, Fabian Meumertzheim wrote: > Anyone who is (or wants to be) a moderator on that list and has a Google > account, please let me know the primary email address so that I can add it > to the "auto_ccs" list for oss-fuzz.com access. > Stefan, would you want to act as the "primary_conta

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

Thanks for creating the list. Anyone who is (or wants to be) a moderator on that list and has a Google account, please let me know the primary email address so that I can add it to the "auto_ccs" list for oss-fuzz.com access. Stefan, would you want to act as the "primary_contact"? That does not r

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

Hi all I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21741 if you want to lend a hand moderating, you may want to add yourself to the ticket before the list is created. Thanks Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

On 2021-04-17, Matt Sicker wrote: > I have a Google account I can be CC’d on. I do security engineering > professionally, so I have some experience in the area as well. Thanks Matt, I'll add you as one of the initial moderators as well. Stefan ---

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

On 2021-04-17, Fabian Meumertzheim wrote: > Let me describe the restrictions in more detail, including example reports. > Everyone listed under "primary" or "auto_cc" will receive the bugs created > in the issue tracker at [1] in email form and can also add comments by > replying to the email thre

Re: [all] OSS Fuzz

Le 17/04/2021 à 18:33, Gary Gregory a écrit : > I'll go with the consensus here but I feel that the security list should be > for humans and posts there deserve human attention on an ASAP basis. I've > just seen too many false positives and noise from automated tools over the > years. Let's just g

Re: Redesign of Commons website generation (was: CMS Deprecated. Removal of configs and move to new publishing area)

On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 13:40, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Note that git also has its gitlink and sub modules features that we could > use here. Are they easy to use? Who is going to design and test the replacement? Will such a design really be easier to use? There's no point changing the publication

Re: Redesign of Commons website generation (was: CMS Deprecated. Removal of configs and move to new publishing area)

Note that git also has its gitlink and sub modules features that we could use here. Gary On Sun, Apr 18, 2021, 08:27 Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Le dim. 18 avr. 2021 à 12:51, sebb a écrit : > > > > On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 00:03, Ralph Goers > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 17, 2021, at

Re: Redesign of Commons website generation (was: CMS Deprecated. Removal of configs and move to new publishing area)

Le dim. 18 avr. 2021 à 12:51, sebb a écrit : > > On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 00:03, Ralph Goers wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Apr 17, 2021, at 3:32 PM, sebb wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 at 22:57, Ralph Goers > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> When I release

Re: Redesign of Commons website generation (was: CMS Deprecated. Removal of configs and move to new publishing area)

On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 00:03, Ralph Goers wrote: > > > > > On Apr 17, 2021, at 3:32 PM, sebb wrote: > > > > On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 at 22:57, Ralph Goers > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> When I release Log4j I rum mvn site followed by "mvn site:stage > >> -DstagingDirect