Re: The case for a Commons component

2021-05-05 Thread Ralph Goers
> On May 5, 2021, at 11:13 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 17:44, Ralph Goers a écrit : >> >> >> >>> On May 5, 2021, at 6:38 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: >>> >>> Le mar. 4 mai 2021 à 02:49, Ralph Goers a >>> écrit : I apologize. I started another thread

Re: The case for a Commons component

2021-05-05 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 2021-05-05 20:31, Oliver Heger a écrit : What about the sandbox? IIUC, every committer can start a new component there. If then a community forms around this component, it can move to proper (which would then require a vote). With the various source hosting solutions available today we no

Re: The case for a Commons component

2021-05-05 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 20:33, Oliver Heger a écrit : > > > > Am 05.05.21 um 20:26 schrieb Gilles Sadowski: > > Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 18:57, Gary Gregory a écrit : > >> > >> IMO the lack of +1s shows the lack of appetite to manage another component > > > > That's certainly true. > > And nobody is

Re: The case for a Commons component

2021-05-05 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 05.05.21 um 20:26 schrieb Gilles Sadowski: Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 18:57, Gary Gregory a écrit : IMO the lack of +1s shows the lack of appetite to manage another component That's certainly true. And nobody is forced to do anything. When the other CM spin-offs started, there was only

Re: The case for a Commons component

2021-05-05 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 18:57, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > IMO the lack of +1s shows the lack of appetite to manage another component That's certainly true. And nobody is forced to do anything. When the other CM spin-offs started, there was only _one_ person willing to do the work. Gilles > [...]

Re: The case for a Commons component

2021-05-05 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 17:44, Ralph Goers a écrit : > > > > > On May 5, 2021, at 6:38 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Le mar. 4 mai 2021 à 02:49, Ralph Goers a > > écrit : > >> > >> I apologize. I started another thread regarding the vote before seeing > >> this. > > > > No problem. > > > >>

Re: Jacoco 0.8.7

2021-05-05 Thread Gary Gregory
Dependabot will pick up the new release within a day or so. Gary On Wed, May 5, 2021, 07:11 Melloware wrote: > Jacoco 0.8.7 was released: > > https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/releases/tag/v0.8.7 > > Any commons projects using Jacoco like BeanUtils2 should upgrade as it > fixes JDK 15 and 16

Re: The case for a Commons component

2021-05-05 Thread Gary Gregory
IMO the lack of +1s shows the lack of appetite to manage another component that not "common" to "most" Java apps, where I use quotes to understand that YMMV. Personally, my plate is full with the current slate of components in which I participate. Gary On Wed, May 5, 2021, 09:38 Gilles Sadowski

Re: The case for a Commons component

2021-05-05 Thread Ralph Goers
> On May 5, 2021, at 6:38 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le mar. 4 mai 2021 à 02:49, Ralph Goers a écrit : >> >> I apologize. I started another thread regarding the vote before seeing this. > > No problem. > >> Maybe that will get more attention? > > It doesn't seem so. :-} > > IMHO,

Re: Jacoco 0.8.7

2021-05-05 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 13:11, Melloware a écrit : > > Jacoco 0.8.7 was released: Thanks for the info. > > https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/releases/tag/v0.8.7 > > Any commons projects using Jacoco like BeanUtils2 should upgrade It seems that this is usually done through "Commons Parent":

Re: The case for a Commons component

2021-05-05 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mar. 4 mai 2021 à 02:49, Ralph Goers a écrit : > > I apologize. I started another thread regarding the vote before seeing this. No problem. > Maybe that will get more attention? It doesn't seem so. :-} IMHO, valid answers have been given to the statements/questions from people who didn't

Jacoco 0.8.7

2021-05-05 Thread Melloware
Jacoco 0.8.7 was released: https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/releases/tag/v0.8.7 Any commons projects using Jacoco like BeanUtils2 should upgrade as it fixes JDK 15 and 16 issues. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: