Hello.
Le lun. 14 juin 2021 à 00:37, John Patrick a écrit :
>
> So I want to start using Java 11 and take advantage of Java Modules. But
> with a bug in Java Multi-Jar not supporting 1.8 as base and 11 upon that,
> and most dependencies I want to upgrade eventually get stuck on a commons
>
On Sun, 13 Jun 2021 at 23:37, John Patrick wrote:
>
> So I want to start using Java 11 and take advantage of Java Modules. But
> with a bug in Java Multi-Jar not supporting 1.8 as base and 11 upon that,
> and most dependencies I want to upgrade eventually get stuck on a commons
> project holding
So I want to start using Java 11 and take advantage of Java Modules. But
with a bug in Java Multi-Jar not supporting 1.8 as base and 11 upon that,
and most dependencies I want to upgrade eventually get stuck on a commons
project holding a pure JPMS solution.
Potentially someone raise an
Le jeu. 10 juin 2021 à 14:42, John Patrick a écrit :
>
> If the tests are valid and useful once post Java 1.8, what about
> starting the next release branch where the min version bumps to Java
> 11.
[Numbers] and related components were meant to replace and
improve some functionalities provided
If the tests are valid and useful once post Java 1.8, what about
starting the next release branch where the min version bumps to Java
11.
As Java 17 starting ramp down starts today I believe so in 3 months we
will have 3 LTS (1.8, 11 and 17) releases. So technically Java 18
development starts
Le jeu. 10 juin 2021 à 13:05, sebb a écrit :
>
> Thanks.
>
> I've updated the RELEASE-NOTES accordingly (feel free to tweak the text)
AFAIK, this is an auto-generated file (from changes.xml).
Gilles
>
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 00:58, Alex Herbert wrote:
> >
> > I have removed the requirement
Thanks.
I've updated the RELEASE-NOTES accordingly (feel free to tweak the text)
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 00:58, Alex Herbert wrote:
>
> I have removed the requirement for Java 9 from the build. It is still used
> in the performance testing module.
>
> Alex
I have removed the requirement for Java 9 from the build. It is still used
in the performance testing module.
Alex
Note that the test could inspect the java version,
or use reflection to see if the method BigDecimal.sqrt() exists...
-r
Randy Strauss, cell: 650-861-1537
On 6/9/21, 2:57 PM, "sebb" wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 19:58, Alex Herbert wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 17:56, sebb