On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 09:34:23 +0200, luc wrote:
Le 2016-04-21 02:39, Gilles a écrit :
On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:14:33 +0100, sebb wrote:
On 20 April 2016 at 02:55, Gilles
wrote:
Hello.
Let's assume the following:
* Some feature branch has been pushed to the Apache repository.
* That branch fixes
Le 2016-04-21 02:39, Gilles a écrit :
On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:14:33 +0100, sebb wrote:
On 20 April 2016 at 02:55, Gilles
wrote:
Hello.
Let's assume the following:
* Some feature branch has been pushed to the Apache repository.
* That branch fixes an issue reported in JIRA.
Has the JIRA been
On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:14:33 +0100, sebb wrote:
On 20 April 2016 at 02:55, Gilles
wrote:
Hello.
Let's assume the following:
* Some feature branch has been pushed to the Apache repository.
* That branch fixes an issue reported in JIRA.
Has the JIRA been updated with the details of the code pu
On 20 April 2016 at 02:55, Gilles wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Let's assume the following:
> * Some feature branch has been pushed to the Apache repository.
> * That branch fixes an issue reported in JIRA.
Has the JIRA been updated with the details of the code push?
> * Nobody has raised an objection aft
Hello.
Let's assume the following:
* Some feature branch has been pushed to the Apache repository.
* That branch fixes an issue reported in JIRA.
* Nobody has raised an objection after some time[1] has passed.
Can we conclude that the code in that branch has been (lazily)
accepted and can be mer
