Hello.
Le jeu. 28 juil. 2022 à 14:36, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> The former sounds broken and the later does not.
Of course, I'm a poorer judge than you about idiomatic usage.
> Technically, I would say
> that "code" is an "uncountable noun".
I suspected the origin of the remark, but I did
The former sounds broken and the later does not. Technically, I would say
that "code" is an "uncountable noun". The English language has many
different kinds of nouns.
I talk about "the code" in the repository and "lines of code" in a file.
Another way to think about this kind of noun is that
Le mer. 27 juil. 2022 à 21:55, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> FYI,
> For codes that are now located...
> ->
> For code that is now located...
Grammatical explanation?
>
> Gary
>
>
> > > > > [...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
FYI,
For codes that are now located...
->
For code that is now located...
Gary
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022, 08:05 Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Le mer. 27 juil. 2022 à 12:34, Gary Gregory a
> écrit :
> >
> > I think it would be nice to detail in the beta release notes what
> > expectations
Le mer. 27 juil. 2022 à 14:06, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>
> Hello.
>
> Le mer. 27 juil. 2022 à 12:34, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> >
> > I think it would be nice to detail in the beta release notes what
> > expectations should be WRT API stability between the beta and release.
>
> Here[1] is an
Hello.
Le mer. 27 juil. 2022 à 12:34, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> I think it would be nice to detail in the beta release notes what
> expectations should be WRT API stability between the beta and release.
Here[1] is an excerpt from the release notes:
---CUT---
This is a major release that
I think it would be nice to detail in the beta release notes what
expectations should be WRT API stability between the beta and release.
Gary
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022, 00:34 Matt Juntunen wrote:
> +1
>
> It would be great to get this code out to developers.
>
> Regards,
> Matt J
>
> On Mon, Jul
+1
It would be great to get this code out to developers.
Regards,
Matt J
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 11:46 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Le lun. 25 juil. 2022 à 16:38, Alex Herbert a
> écrit :
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 14:37, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > How about
Le lun. 25 juil. 2022 à 16:38, Alex Herbert a écrit :
>
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 14:37, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > How about making a "beta" release of the next major version:
> > 4.0-beta1
> > ?
> >
> > This
> >https://commons.apache.org/
> > page refers to a
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 14:37, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hello.
>
> How about making a "beta" release of the next major version:
> 4.0-beta1
> ?
>
> This
>https://commons.apache.org/
> page refers to a "1.0-beta1" release [Statistics] that does not
> seem to exist. This is a required
Hello.
How about making a "beta" release of the next major version:
4.0-beta1
?
This
https://commons.apache.org/
page refers to a "1.0-beta1" release [Statistics] that does not
seem to exist. This is a required dependency for [Math].
Regards,
Gilles
2020-04-12 20:23 UTC+02:00, Alex Herbert :
>
>> On 12 Apr 2020, at 15:58, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> I propose to release version
>>>0.1-beta1
>>> of "Commons Statistics", as part of the dependency
>>> requirements for a beta release of the next major version
>>> of
> On 12 Apr 2020, at 15:58, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
>> [...]
>>
>> I propose to release version
>>0.1-beta1
>> of "Commons Statistics", as part of the dependency
>> requirements for a beta release of the next major version
>> of "Commons Math".
>>
>
> Should we change the
Hi.
> [...]
>
> I propose to release version
> 0.1-beta1
> of "Commons Statistics", as part of the dependency
> requirements for a beta release of the next major version
> of "Commons Math".
>
Should we change the "version" from
0.1-beta1
to
1.0-beta1
?
The rationale for a 0.x was
None from me, +1
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 0:58, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hello.
I propose to release version
0.1-beta1
of "Commons Statistics", as part of the dependency
requirements for a beta release of the next major version
of "Commons Math".
Any
Hello.
I propose to release version
0.1-beta1
of "Commons Statistics", as part of the dependency
requirements for a beta release of the next major version
of "Commons Math".
Any objections?
Regards,
Gilles
-
To
16 matches
Mail list logo
