[convert] BeanUtils vs. Convert

2013-08-14 Thread Paul Benedict
Two weeks ago, I mentioned that BeanUtils and Convert heavily overlap. Some others agreed. Do we want to fold one project into the other? Or can we find justification to have 2 separate conversion projects? -- Cheers, Paul

Re: [convert] BeanUtils vs. Convert

2013-08-14 Thread James Carman
I would say we should extract the conversion stuff out of [beanutils] and create [convert] (with some modifications to the API perhaps) an have [beanutils] use the new component. On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote: Two weeks ago, I mentioned that BeanUtils

Re: [convert] BeanUtils vs. Convert

2013-08-14 Thread Gary Gregory
That sounds good to me too. The less duplication, the better. Gary On Aug 14, 2013, at 18:16, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: I would say we should extract the conversion stuff out of [beanutils] and create [convert] (with some modifications to the API perhaps) an have