> > > e...@zusammenkunft.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> Hello,
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> I am for http4. In the begining it wont be maped in the
> > > > > > > S
> > > > > Sounds good to me.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> I do wonder if we can get rid of a Special https Provider and
> > have
> > > > > > only one (http4) which can handle both Ki
> what
> > > > > do you think?
> > > > > > > From user's perspective, it seems better to keep 'https'
> separately
> > > > > > > from 'http'. 'http4s' and 'http4' accordingly.
> > > > > > > We can possibly consider ne
.html' (equivalent to the
> > first) or
> > > > > > 'http4:https://www.example.com/index.html. But that doesn't seem
> > to
> > > > > > make anything more convenient than simply allowing either
> > > > > > 'http4://www.example.com/ind
m/index.html' or
> > > > > 'http4s://www.example.com/index.html'.
> > > > > So, I'm personally inclined to keep the existing pattern to have
> > > > > separate providers.
> > > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
le.com/index.html' or
> > > > 'http4s://www.example.com/index.html'.
> > > > So, I'm personally inclined to keep the existing pattern to have
> > > > separate providers.
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> Besides that, I wonder if we also (on
> > with HttpComponents HttpClient v4 first. ;-) Also, it's very matured
> > > and well-accepted, comparing with the new JDK HttpClient.
> > > I'm open to a possibility in the near future for a new separate
> > > provider, possibly called 'jdkhttp' with JDK HttpClient mod
very matured
> > and well-accepted, comparing with the new JDK HttpClient.
> > I'm open to a possibility in the near future for a new separate
> > provider, possibly called 'jdkhttp' with JDK HttpClient module.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Woonsan
>
pen to a possibility in the near future for a new separate
> provider, possibly called 'jdkhttp' with JDK HttpClient module.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Woonsan
>
>>
>> Gruss
>> Bernd
>>
>> --
>> http://bernd.eckenfels.net
>>
>> Von:
.
Kind regards,
Woonsan
>
> Gruss
> Bernd
>
> --
> http://bernd.eckenfels.net
>
> Von: Woonsan Ko
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. August 2018 18:35
> An: Commons Developers List
> Betreff: [vfs] new http4 provider, not replace http?
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm tryin
also (only?) should consider the new JDK
httpclient api?
Gruss
Bernd
--
http://bernd.eckenfels.net
Von: Woonsan Ko
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. August 2018 18:35
An: Commons Developers List
Betreff: [vfs] new http4 provider, not replace http?
Hi,
I'm trying to contribute for VFS-360. What a nice
Hi,
I'm trying to contribute for VFS-360. What a nice ticket number!
After a brief look, I'm considering to add a new provider in a
separate package, 'http4' (based on HttpComponents HttpClient),
keeping the old one, 'http' (based on the old Commons HttpClient),
as-is. The reason is that I don't
12 matches
Mail list logo
