-Original Message-
From: Luc Maisonobe
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 1:40 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [math] Problems with sparse implementations of RealVector
Hi Sébastien,
Le 18/06/2012 08:11, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
Dear all,
in this thread,
http
And, it is much worse than that. Pretty much nobody cares about ebe, but
dotProduct and outerProduct also assume that 0*NaN = 0 and 0*+-Infinity = 0.
e.g.:
RealVector a = new OpenMapRealVector(10);
RealVector b = new OpenMapRealVector(10);
a.setEntry(1, 1.0);
b.setEntry(2,
Hi Bill,
2012/6/19 Bill Barker billwbar...@verizon.net:
-Original Message- From: Luc Maisonobe
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 1:40 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [math] Problems with sparse implementations of RealVector
Hi Sébastien,
Le 18/06/2012 08:11, Sébastien
Hi Bill,
And, it is much worse than that. Pretty much nobody cares about ebe, but
dotProduct and outerProduct also assume that 0*NaN = 0 and 0*+-Infinity = 0.
e.g.:
RealVector a = new OpenMapRealVector(10);
RealVector b = new OpenMapRealVector(10);
a.setEntry(1, 1.0);
Hi Sébastien,
Le 18/06/2012 08:11, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
Dear all,
in this thread,
http://markmail.org/thread/hhvm6wv3d3uhkwqs
we had an interesting discussion on a bug which was revealed by
abstract unit tests on all implementations of RealVector. It turns out
that the bug is more
