Re: [VOTE] Release of Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC3

2013-02-28 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 02/28/2013 03:12 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > +1 my own +1 @JIRA: this is my output from running mvn site on the RC3 tag. the JIRA plugin is not running at all, but I have seen it failing for other components before, e.g. commons-math my setup: Apache Maven 3.0.2 (r1056850; 2011-01-09 01:58:1

Re: [VFS] UserAuthenticationData enhancement

2013-02-28 Thread Jean-Marc Borer
Jörg, I am new to this list and project. I have actively contributed to VFS especially to the HTTP and Webdav parts. When I file an issue or a request for improvement, I also publish a patch. Where can I find the information if my patch will be accepted/integrated in which version and when it is p

Re: [VFS] UserAuthenticationData enhancement

2013-02-28 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Jean-Marc 2013/2/28 Jean-Marc Borer > Jörg, I am new to this list and project. I have actively contributed > to VFS especially to the HTTP and Webdav parts. When I file an issue > or a request for improvement, I also publish a patch. > > Nice that you've joined us! > Where can I find th

Re: [VFS] UserAuthenticationData enhancement

2013-02-28 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hello Jean-Marc > > > 2013/2/28 Jean-Marc Borer > >> Jörg, I am new to this list and project. I have actively contributed >> to VFS especially to the HTTP and Webdav parts. When I file an issue >> or a request for improvement, I also publish a patch. >> >> > Nice

Re: [BeanUtils] Next release 1.8.4 or 1.9?

2013-02-28 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2013/2/23 Benedikt Ritter > Hi, > > I just wanted to start a discussion whether we should push out a bugfix > release or start to work on new features right away and release a 1.9 > (including bug fixes of course ;-) > > Benedikt > I have looked through a lot of issues in the meantime. There are

Re: [VFS] UserAuthenticationData enhancement

2013-02-28 Thread Jean-Marc Borer
OK guys, thank you for your feedback. I'll provide those patches, but it is difficult sometimes to keep up with them because the source code in trunk changes and patches may conflict (it happened recently to me after making a update). Would it be possible for me to become a commiter for HTTP and w

[collections] update of groupId / artifactId

2013-02-28 Thread Thomas Neidhart
Hi, I am planning to change the groupId/artifactId very soon to the following name (see COLLECTIONS-382): org.apache.commons.collections4 This will also have a big impact on the serialization tests. Just that everybody is aware whats going to happen. Thomas P.S. I know some people may not be h

[collections] jira / release notes

2013-02-28 Thread Thomas Neidhart
Hi, in case people are wondering why I reopened & resolved so many issues: I am starting to complete the release notes, and want to have a clear picture on the changes 3.2.1 -> 4.0. I hope I have now all issues related to 4.0 in the fixes / resolved status, and will put them step by step into th

Re: [BeanUtils] Next release 1.8.4 or 1.9?

2013-02-28 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi, Am 28.02.2013 14:28, schrieb Benedikt Ritter: 2013/2/23 Benedikt Ritter Hi, I just wanted to start a discussion whether we should push out a bugfix release or start to work on new features right away and release a 1.9 (including bug fixes of course ;-) Benedikt I have looked through

Re: [VOTE] Release of Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC3

2013-02-28 Thread Oliver Heger
+1, looks good. Just one minor thing: The source release now contains the cgi for the download page. Is this expected to be there? I did not notice it before, but the RAT report was complaining about it. This was not the case for the previous RC. Oliver Am 27.02.2013 22:37, schrieb Thomas N

Re: [VOTE] Release of Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC3

2013-02-28 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 02/28/2013 10:04 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > +1, looks good. > > Just one minor thing: The source release now contains the cgi for the > download page. Is this expected to be there? I did not notice it before, > but the RAT report was complaining about it. This was not the case for > the previous

Re: [VOTE] Release of Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC3

2013-02-28 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 2013/2/27 Thomas Neidhart : > Hi, > > I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC3. > > This release candidate has the following changes compared to RC2: > > * Added missing slf4j binding which caused test failures with IBM JDKs > > The files: > > The artifacts are de

Re: [collections] jira / release notes

2013-02-28 Thread Gary Gregory
I am wondering about the duplication of effort bw changes.xml and the Jira report. Don't they show the same thing? Gary On Feb 28, 2013, at 15:32, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi, > > in case people are wondering why I reopened & resolved so many issues: > > I am starting to complete the release no

Karma on jira

2013-02-28 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, Can someone give me karma to jira in order to assign to me and close issues ? Or I need to create a INFRA jira ? Thanks -- Olivier Lamy http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un

Re: [beanutils] describe() has strange behavior for collection properties ([BEANUTILS-409])

2013-02-28 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to have some feedback on [BEANUTILS-409] - 'describe' method > returning Incorrect array value [1]. If a bean has an array or collection > property describe will only return the first entry of this member. > This is, becau

Re: [collections] update of groupId / artifactId

2013-02-28 Thread sebb
On 28 February 2013 17:24, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi, > > I am planning to change the groupId/artifactId very soon to the > following name (see COLLECTIONS-382): org.apache.commons.collections4 > > This will also have a big impact on the serialization tests. > > Just that everybody is aware what

Source now contains download.cgi [was: [VOTE] Release of Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC3]

2013-02-28 Thread sebb
On 28 February 2013 21:26, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 02/28/2013 10:04 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: >> +1, looks good. >> >> Just one minor thing: The source release now contains the cgi for the >> download page. Is this expected to be there? I did not notice it before, >> but the RAT report was compl

Re: [collections] jira / release notes

2013-02-28 Thread sebb
On 28 February 2013 22:25, Gary Gregory wrote: > I am wondering about the duplication of effort bw changes.xml and the > Jira report. Don't they show the same thing? Not all changes necessarily have an associated JIRA. Also the JIRA Fix version is not stable; it can be changed at any time - and

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-02-28 Thread Lukasz Lenart
How can I update ognl website? Simple checkout [1] and update what I need? and then what to do? eg. RAT report is broken as it includes all the html files [2] [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/commons/content/proper/commons-ognl/ [2] http://commons.apache.org/proper/comm

Re: [collections] update of groupId / artifactId

2013-02-28 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/01/2013 02:36 AM, sebb wrote: > On 28 February 2013 17:24, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am planning to change the groupId/artifactId very soon to the >> following name (see COLLECTIONS-382): org.apache.commons.collections4 >> >> This will also have a big impact on the serialization

Re: [collections] jira / release notes

2013-02-28 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/01/2013 02:43 AM, sebb wrote: > On 28 February 2013 22:25, Gary Gregory wrote: >> I am wondering about the duplication of effort bw changes.xml and the >> Jira report. Don't they show the same thing? > > Not all changes necessarily have an associated JIRA. > > Also the JIRA Fix version is