On 16 December 2014 at 08:49, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2014-12-15 16:54 GMT+01:00 :
>>
>> Author: sebb
>> Date: Mon Dec 15 15:54:38 2014
>> New Revision: 1645679
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1645679
>> Log:
>> Unused
>>
>> Modifi
On 16 December 2014 at 13:22, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Was the stopping of providing snapshots at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/commons/commons-math3/3.4-SNAPSHOT/
> part of the migration to "git"?
Yes, indirectly, because they were generated by Conti
On 16 December 2014 at 08:58, luc wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Le 2014-12-16 00:49, pste...@apache.org a écrit :
>>
>> Repository: commons-math
>> Updated Branches:
>> refs/heads/master 809f0f89c -> 540aa2e7e
>>
>>
>> Added Bessel functions of the first kind, based on NetLib implementation.
>>
>> JIRA:
On 16 December 2014 at 21:10, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can we consider MATH-1173 is solved, and postpone MATH-1146, MATH-1153
> (I was not able to integrate the patch without breaking other tests),
> MATH-1158 (I don' tunderstand from the discussion if the patch
> completely breaks compa
On 17 December 2014 at 00:01, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/16/14 1:51 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 16 December 2014 at 08:58, luc wrote:
>>> Hi Phil,
>>>
>>> Le 2014-12-16 00:49, pste...@apache.org a écrit :
>>>> Repository: commons-math
>>&
It would be helpful to add such info to the Commons Git docs
On 17 December 2014 at 07:02, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 12/17/2014 05:10 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> I am lost here. Sorry I am still git-newbie. I see no subsequent
>> commit message showing this change has been backed out, but it lo
On 17 December 2014 at 10:50, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
> Le 17/12/2014 02:21, sebb a écrit :
>> On 17 December 2014 at 00:01, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 12/16/14 1:51 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>> On 16 December 2014 at 08:58, luc wrote:
>>>>
On 18 December 2014 at 11:37, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>> You're bringing up a valid point here... If ASF committers can change the
>> code/fix bugs/implement new features, they should be able to modify the
>> corresponding jira tickets.
>
> They should be able... yes.
> But does thatt mean we've go
On 18 December 2014 at 23:19, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.4.
>
> Note that since [math] now uses git, access to the tag is slightly
> different from other components. To clone a fresh tag, run this command
> (beware I have split it in 2 lines below):
On 18 December 2014 at 23:56, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 19/12/2014 00:50, sebb a écrit :
>> On 18 December 2014 at 23:19, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.4.
>>>
>>> Note that since [math] now uses git, access to th
If it's not done properly, why bother with a VOTE at all?
On 19 December 2014 at 00:51, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 19/12/2014 01:08, sebb a écrit :
>
>> The VOTE email should include all the information needed to validate a
>> release.
>
> You are right but this
On 19 December 2014 at 09:17, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi Luc,
>
> tested the artifacts with java version "1.7.0_71".
> Everything looks good, great work.
>
> +1
>
> @missing revision in vote mail:
>
> from my POV this is really just convenience for the reviewers as *any*
> commit to a branch will
On 19 December 2014 at 06:02, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 19/12/2014 03:25, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:14 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>> If it's not done properly, why bother with a VOTE at all?
>>>
>>
>> I'm with Sebb
On 19 December 2014 at 10:36, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
> Le 19/12/2014 11:17, sebb a écrit :
>> On 19 December 2014 at 06:02, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> Le 19/12/2014 03:25, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>>>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:14 PM, sebb wrote:
&
On 19 December 2014 at 14:51, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:09 AM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 19 December 2014 at 09:17, Thomas Neidhart
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Luc,
>> >
>> > tested the artifacts with java version "1.7.0_71&q
The VOTE email needs a link to the KEYS file as this is needed to check sigs.
i.e.
https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
On 19 December 2014 at 15:30, Gilles wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 16:10:55 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>
>> Le 19/12/2014 15:59, Gilles a écrit :
>>>
>>> On Fri, 19 Dec
On 20 December 2014 at 01:57, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Am Sat, 20 Dec 2014 02:48:43 +0100
> schrieb Bernd Eckenfels :
>
>>
>> Bug,New Feature,Task,Improvement,Wish,Test
>>
>> So should we add "improvement" here as well?
>
> Sorry I missed the fact it is already added. Any other idea wha
-1
There are still problems in the NOTICE and/or LICENSE files.
None of the additional attributions in the NOTICE file have
corresponding entries in the LICENSE file.
That cannot be correct, regardless of whether the attributions are required.
AFAICT the attributions are not required *unless* t
On 20 December 2014 at 11:44, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Am Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:35:30 +
> schrieb sebb :
>
>> On 20 December 2014 at 01:57, Bernd Eckenfels
>> wrote:
>> > Am Sat, 20 Dec 2014 02:48:43 +0100
>> > schrieb Bernd Eckenfels :
>>
On 22 December 2014 at 16:15, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Am Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:55:53 +
> schrieb sebb :
>
>> The relnotes profile is optional, and is specifically designed for
>> generating release notes.
>
> Yes, VFS currently has a copy "relnotes", this
On 22 December 2014 at 16:19, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 22/12/2014 16:44, sebb a écrit :
>> -1
>>
>> There are still problems in the NOTICE and/or LICENSE files.
>>
>> None of the additional attributions in the NOTICE file have
>> corresponding entri
On 22 December 2014 at 17:09, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 22/12/2014 17:33, sebb a écrit :
>> On 22 December 2014 at 16:19, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> Le 22/12/2014 16:44, sebb a écrit :
>>>> -1
>>>>
>>>> There are still problems in the NOTICE
On 22 December 2014 at 19:17, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 22/12/2014 18:28, sebb a écrit :
>> On 22 December 2014 at 17:09, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> Le 22/12/2014 17:33, sebb a écrit :
>>>> On 22 December 2014 at 16:19, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>>>>
On 22 December 2014 at 20:59, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Hello,
>
> in commons-math I see the comment, that the OSGi bundle-symbolic name
> should be aligned with the package name (i.e. major version).
>
> For VFS2 this is currently not the case. I can see multiple solutions
> for 2.1:
>
> a) follow
On 22 December 2014 at 21:57, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Am Mon, 22 Dec 2014 21:43:01 +
> schrieb sebb :
>
>> > a) follow the math lead and make it org.apache.commons.vfs2 (asuming
>> > this does not break anything from 2.0 to 2.1)
>>
>> If the OSGi bundl
On 22 December 2014 at 20:44, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 22/12/2014 21:42, l...@apache.org a écrit :
>> Repository: commons-math
>> Updated Branches:
>> refs/heads/master 649e19b0f -> c4bd6c6a0
>>
>>
>> Simplifying again repartition between LICENSE and NOTICE files.
>>
>> Project: http://git-wip-
On 22 December 2014 at 22:37, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Am Mon, 22 Dec 2014 22:29:34 +
> schrieb sebb :
>
>> But if we always use the same symbolic name, it may look as though an
>> app that was built using VFS2.0 will just be able to use VFS19.2
>> without any ad
On 23 December 2014 at 07:55, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
> I'd like to make a public (synchronized) version of the
> "toBufferedInputStream" method in this class, which would allow
> zero-copy turnaround of the outputstream to an input-stream; I am a
> bit puzzled why this hasn't been done yet.
Hu
On 23 December 2014 at 00:13, wrote:
> Author: psteitz
> Date: Tue Dec 23 00:13:57 2014
> New Revision: 1647457
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1647457
> Log:
> Updated version, copyright date in footer.
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/pool/trunk/build.xml
>
> Modified: commons/proper/pool/tru
On 22 December 2014 at 15:24, wrote:
> Author: krosenvold
> Date: Mon Dec 22 15:24:02 2014
> New Revision: 1647329
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1647329
> Log:
> COMPRESS-296 Parallel compression. Added StreamCompressor and
> ScatterZipOutputStream.
>
> StreamCompressor is an extract of the de
On 23 December 2014 at 14:32, Kristian Rosenvold
wrote:
> Thanks for the comments, fixed in r1647582.
>
> Is there such a thing as a "commons" IntelliJ code style file ?
Best asked in a new thread.
> Kristian
>
>
> 2014-12-23 11:46 GMT+01:00 sebb :
>>
On 23 December 2014 at 17:32, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_2_3_RC1/
Tags are not immutable; the vote thread needs the revision.
> Release:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/
Likewise, the URL does not uniquely ide
On 23 December 2014 at 21:57, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/23/14 1:11 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 23 December 2014 at 17:32, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> Tag:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_2_3_RC1/
>
>
> r1647682
>
>>>
On 24 December 2014 at 15:11, Gilles wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Dec 2014 15:52:12 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>
>> Le 24/12/2014 15:04, Gilles a écrit :
>>>
>>> On Wed, 24 Dec 2014 09:31:46 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 24/12/2014 03:36, Gilles a écrit :
>
> On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 14:02:
On 27 December 2014 at 22:19, Gilles wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Dec 2014 17:48:05 +0000, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 24 December 2014 at 15:11, Gilles wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 24 Dec 2014 15:52:12 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> L
There are two stages to the mirroring:
1) svnpubsub copies the files from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/commons/math/
to
http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/math/
this is geo-dependent, and resolves to
http://www.eu.apache.org/dist/commons/math/
and/or
http://www.us.apache.org/dist/c
On 29 December 2014 at 10:36, Gilles wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Dec 2014 20:21:32 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>> On 12/28/14 11:46 AM, Gilles wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2014 09:43:34 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>>>
>>&
On 29 December 2014 at 13:52, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
>
>> Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > We have received some requests to release the fixes we habe implemented
>> in
>> > Commons Validator since 1.4 was released, so I would
On 29 December 2014 at 19:48, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> The download page of apache commons reads like there is supposed to be
> a KEYS column in the table. But it is now a general link, so I would
> apply the following changes, if you agree:
I think the reference to the KEYS file needs to come be
On 29 December 2014 at 20:13, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Am Mon, 29 Dec 2014 20:01:29 +
> schrieb sebb :
>
>> On 29 December 2014 at 19:48, Bernd Eckenfels
>> wrote:
>> > The download page of apache commons reads like there is supposed to
>> > be a KE
On 30 December 2014 at 01:07, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> 2014-12-29 14:56 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory :
>> >
>> > Hi All:
>> >
>> > There seems to be a constant background desire of moving this and that
>> > Commons component to Git. Moving all o
r
agreed upon.
>
> Regards,
> Gilles
>
>
>>
>> Gruss
>> Bernd
>>
>>
>>
>> Am Tue, 30 Dec 2014 02:05:29
>> +0100 schrieb Gilles :
>>
>>> On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:54:59 +, sebb wrote:
>>> > On 29 December 2
he source is released, it's still necessary for the RM
and reviewers to build and test it.
> Gruss
> Bernd
>
>>
>> Of course, each release means some work has to be done; then IIUC your
>> point, the fewer releases the better. :-}
>>
>>
>
>> >
On 30 December 2014 at 02:06, Gilles wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:48:20 +0000, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 30 December 2014 at 01:36, Bernd Eckenfels
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Am Tue, 30 Dec 2014 02:29:38 +0100
>>> schrieb Gil
On 30 December 2014 at 02:40, Gilles wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:38:12 +0000, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 30 December 2014 at 01:29, Gilles wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 02:09:42 +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
On 30 December 2014 at 03:05, Gilles wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 02:12:51 +0000, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 30 December 2014 at 02:06, Gilles wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:48:20 +, sebb wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>&
I started working on a fix for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VALIDATOR-336
CUSIPCheckDigit Thinks Invalid CUSIP is Valid
I think the code fix is quite simple, however it has not been so easy
to fix the tests, as they don't really allow for two kinds of validity
(syntax error and invalid c
Agreed
On 30 December 2014 at 13:58, Gary Gregory wrote:
> After this release we should update to Java 5 IMO.
>
> Gary
>
> Original message From: Jörg Schaible
> Date:12/30/2014 07:57 (GMT-05:00)
> To: dev@commons.apache.org Cc: Subject: Re:
> svn commit: r1648523 - /commo
On 30 December 2014 at 19:41, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 30/12/2014 19:30, Gilles a écrit :
>> Hello.
>>
>> I don't think I've followed the correct path for updating the
>> web site to fix MATH-1184.
>>
>> Reading the "release howto" I understood that I could modify
>> the checked-out repository an
On 31 December 2014 at 05:16, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Jochen asked about the release plugin in the context of Git migration.
> It might safe routine work for releases, but it seems to me also
> underspecified in the context of Apache Commons (with SVN and Git)
>
> [VFS] uses the releas
out of scope for
the 1.4.1 release.
I'll exclude these entries for now.
> Adrian Crum
> Sandglass Software
> www.sandglass-software.com
>
> On 12/30/2014 5:23 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> Author: sebb
>> Date: Wed Dec 31 01:23:26 2014
>> New Revision:
On 30 December 2014 at 12:29, wrote:
> Author: britter
> Date: Tue Dec 30 12:29:27 2014
> New Revision: 1648518
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1648518
> Log:
> Add missing files to binary and source distribution
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/validator/trunk/src/main/assembly/bin.xml
> c
a to me. It looks like you've already fixed that up too!
>
> Gary
>
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 8:13 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> I started working on a fix for
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VALIDATOR-336
>>
>> CUSIPCheckDigit Thinks Invalid CUSIP is Valid
On 31 December 2014 at 14:45, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Hello sebb,
>
> Am Wed, 31 Dec 2014 12:49:17 +
> schrieb sebb :
>
>> On 31 December 2014 at 05:16, Bernd Eckenfels
>> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Jochen asked about the release plug
On 31 December 2014 at 15:08, wrote:
> Author: britter
> Date: Wed Dec 31 15:08:34 2014
> New Revision: 1648715
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1648715
> Log:
> Add missing spaces
Oops, sorry about that.
I fixed one and did not notice the others.
> Modified:
> commons/proper/validator/trunk
On 31 December 2014 at 15:09, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the fix Sebb! I'm going to cut RC2 tomorrow.
Fine, but please can we apply the check digit fixes first?
I had a look through the other outstanding issues, and I think any
others will take a bit of effort t
ught you already committed the fix. I'll review and commit
>> it tomorrow.
>>
>> Benedikt
>>
>> Send from my mobile device
>>
>> > Am 31.12.2014 um 16:17 schrieb sebb :
>> >
>> >> On 31 December 2014 at 15:09, Benedikt Ritter
>&
Just noticed that the IANA TLD list has changed.
This should not matter, except that it has dropped "9C" and replaced it by
-3DS443G
XN--3E0B707E
XN--45BRJ9C
Looks like the "9C" entry was a mistake.
Unfortunately that is now included in the internal database.
I don't know how serious an issue
On 31 December 2014 at 13:02, sebb wrote:
> On 31 December 2014 at 04:42, Adrian Crum
> wrote:
>> Be aware that the file contains encoded Chinese TLDs (XN--*). So, it needs
>> additional parsing.
>
> Oops.
>
> These entries use PunyCode. This is available i
Sorry, the mistake is mine entirely.
The code to download the file was wrong - it was not checking the
length of the buffer when writing the output.
The 9C entry is obviously wrong, as is the code in DomainValidatorTest.
On 2 January 2015 at 00:06, sebb wrote:
> Just noticed that the IANA
On 2 January 2015 at 09:18, wrote:
> Author: britter
> Date: Fri Jan 2 09:18:37 2015
> New Revision: 1648982
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1648982
> Log:
> COMMONSSITE-81: commons-build-plugin README/CONTRIBUTING.md handle
> multi-modules. Fix implemented by Bernd Eckenfels.
>
> Modified:
>
Java 5 for a 1.5 release.
>
> Gary
>
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> Hm, not sure how serious this is. Let's see what others think. My feeling
>> is that we can fix that in 1.4.2 or 1.5
>>
>> Benedikt
>>
>> 2015
Probably Java 1.4 is not installed or the symbol is not set up.
So Maven cannot find the compiler.
On 2 January 2015 at 14:03, Gary Gregory wrote:
> The build page says "Compilation failure" in the console output but not
> what the failure is! Uh?
>
> Gary
>
> -- Forwarded message ---
check for newer APIs you have to compile against the
appropriate Java jars.
> Adrian Crum
> Sandglass Software
> www.sandglass-software.com
>
>
> On 1/2/2015 6:17 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> Author: sebb
>> Date: Fri Jan 2 14:17:48 2015
>> New Re
x the problems discovered by sebb.
> I will waint until the XN-- entries are added before I roll out a new RC.
>
> Thanks!
> Benedikt
>
> 2015-01-01 19:02 GMT+01:00 Benedikt Ritter :
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> we have fixed the issues which where found in RC1 so I'd like
; (by writ or general practice) for closing tickets that haven't seen any
>> action in some time? Seems like old tickets that haven't moved in a while
>> (e.g. [1]) might be candidates for "reopen if this becomes interesting
>> again."
>>
>
> There is
On 3 January 2015 at 12:34, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello Sebb,
>
> 2015-01-03 4:35 GMT+01:00 sebb :
>
>> I've made quite a bit of progress.
>>
>> However the IANA text file merges all the TLDs into one file - there
>> is no indication of whether the T
On 3 January 2015 at 18:38, Gilles wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 18:01:22 +0000, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 3 January 2015 at 12:32, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Carl,
>>>
>>> 2015-01-03 2:49 GMT+01:00 Carl Hall :
>>>
>>>>
nd we are going to fix V-235 now.
I'll replace the Unicode entries shortly.
On 3 January 2015 at 18:32, sebb wrote:
> On 3 January 2015 at 12:34, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> Hello Sebb,
>>
>> 2015-01-03 4:35 GMT+01:00 sebb :
>>
>>> I've made quite a b
On 4 January 2015 at 12:58, Gilles wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 12:09:35 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Le 04/01/2015 02:07, Gilles a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>> It reminded me that I had yet to improve one toy example in the
>>> "src/userguide/java/org/apache/commons/math3/use
+1
On 4 January 2015 at 19:15, Gary Gregory wrote:
> +1: Interfaces should be used to define contracts, not constants. I like
> using classes to define constants.
>
> Gary
>
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> imaging has a lot of constant interfaces and e
Did you see my mail from earlier today titled as below ?
Compiling and running examples
This explains how Commons NET examples are built and used.
On 4 January 2015 at 18:21, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> In the "src/userguide/java" directory, there are a few
> self-contained usage examples.
>
> I th
On 5 January 2015 at 07:03, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> there have been some fixes in the last few days (mostly thanks to sebb) and
> my feeling is, that we're ready to cut 1.4.1 RC3.
Yes, I think it is in a stable state.
I have been checking the source with Java 1.4 on
On 5 January 2015 at 13:43, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2015-01-04, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
>> Most surprising to me is that it seems like the overhead of lots of
>> small calls to RandomAccessFile.write seems to be a lot costlier than
>> I thought it would be. It seems like consolidating to a
On 5 January 2015 at 14:33, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2015-01-05 15:09 GMT+01:00 sebb :
>
>> On 5 January 2015 at 07:03, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > there have been some fixes in the last few days (mostly thanks to sebb)
>> and
>
On 5 January 2015 at 15:54, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 1/5/15 5:39 AM, Gilles wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 14:37:41 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 1/4/15 5:58 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hello.
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 12:09:35 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Le 04/
gt;
>>
>> Send from my mobile device
>>
>> > Am 05.01.2015 um 16:34 schrieb sebb :
>> >
>> >> On 5 January 2015 at 14:33, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> >> 2015-01-05 15:09 GMT+01:00 sebb :
>> >>
>> >>>> On 5 Jan
On 6 January 2015 at 00:30, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:09 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 5 January 2015 at 07:03, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > there have been some fixes in the last few days (mostly thanks to sebb)
>> an
conversion
Further, the label length checking is done after conversion already
2) URL validation only converts http(s) URLs to punycode, but
presumably should convert domains for all schemes?
Will fix 1 now; 2 will take longer.
On 6 January 2015 at 00:39, sebb wrote:
> On 6 January 2015 at 00
>>> src/userguide/java
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> NB: this will produce classes on target/classes so you need to exclude
>>> them in the JAR.
>>&g
gt;>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> NB: this will produce classes on target/classes so you need to exclude
>>>> them in the JAR.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> I
-1
When the first components moved to Git, the agreement was that these
would be used to iron out any problems and create some documentation
to enable developers who know SVN to migrate to Git.
AFAICT there is no such documentation.
It does not have to be extensive, just some details of commonly
On 6 January 2015 at 17:24, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello Sebb,
>
> 2015-01-06 18:01 GMT+01:00 sebb :
>
>> -1
>>
>> When the first components moved to Git, the agreement was that these
>> would be used to iron out any problems and create some documentation
>
On 6 January 2015 at 18:54, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 06/01/2015 18:01, sebb a écrit :
>> -1
>>
>> When the first components moved to Git, the agreement was that these
>> would be used to iron out any problems and create some documentation
>> to enable develope
On 6 January 2015 at 19:29, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 06/01/2015 20:05, sebb a écrit :
>> On 6 January 2015 at 18:54, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> Le 06/01/2015 18:01, sebb a écrit :
>>>> -1
>>>>
>>>> When the first components moved to Git, the a
On 6 January 2015 at 19:19, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi
>
> Luc and Kristian have asked to be added as contributors to the Wiki. I
> seem to be able to grant that, but need your wiki names in order to do
> so.
I've done Luc.
> I'm not able to grant Kristian JIRA karma.
>
> Stefan
>
> ---
On 6 January 2015 at 19:47, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2015-01-06 20:19 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig :
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Luc and Kristian have asked to be added as contributors to the Wiki. I
>> seem to be able to grant that, but need your wiki names in order to do
>> so.
>>
>> I'm not able to grant Kristi
On 6 January 2015 at 20:05, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 06/01/2015 20:48, Apache Wiki a écrit :
>> Dear Wiki user,
>>
>> You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
>> change notification.
>>
>> The "FrontPage" page has been changed by LucMaisonobe:
>> https://wiki.apa
https://wiki.apache.org/commons/ContributorsGroup#line-19
On 6 January 2015 at 21:24, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
> I just created "KristianRosenvold" account on the wiki.
>
> Kristian
>
> 2015-01-06 20:46 GMT+01:00 sebb :
>> On 6 January 2015 at 19:19, Stefan Bod
On 7 January 2015 at 08:23, luc wrote:
> Le 2015-01-06 23:13, Gilles a écrit :
>>
>> On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 23:10:33 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Do we head towards 4.0, starting to implement the dreaded
>>> breakings? ;-)
>
>
>
> +1, +1, +1, +1 !!!
>
> To be serious, yes, we are reall
I've just started trying to look at some Math code with Eclipse.
However it's not at all obvious how to create the initial project.
I'm used to SVN where there is a list of SVN repos, and one can just
checkout the required tree.
How is one supposed to add the initial project to Eclipse?
---
The RO git URL
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-math.git
does not work with Eclipse.
This appears to be because the URL redirects to
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-math.git
and Eclipse does not like the redirect.
However, if all access is being forced through ht
On 7 January 2015 at 13:59, Gilles wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>>
>> I have pushed the change to the userguide. To execute the example you do
>> the following:
>>
>> * go to commons-math folder, type mvn clean install
>>this step is only needed if your local maven repository does not yet
>>contai
On 7 January 2015 at 16:06, luc wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
> Le 2015-01-07 16:11, sebb a écrit :
>
>> I've just started trying to look at some Math code with Eclipse.
>>
>> However it's not at all obvious how to create the initial project.
>>
>> I&#
On 7 January 2015 at 16:29, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 01/07/2015 04:50 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 7 January 2015 at 13:59, Gilles wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have pushed the change to the userguide. To execute the example you d
On 7 January 2015 at 17:12, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 01/07/2015 06:00 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 7 January 2015 at 16:29, Thomas Neidhart
>> wrote:
>>> On 01/07/2015 04:50 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>> On 7 January 2015 at 13:59, Gilles wrote:
>>>>>>
On 7 January 2015 at 17:14, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Am Wed, 7 Jan 2015 16:42:56 +
> schrieb sebb :
>
>> On 7 January 2015 at 16:06, luc wrote:
>> > Hi Sebb,
>> >
>> > Le 2015-01-07 16:11, sebb a écrit :
>> >
>> >>
On 7 January 2015 at 17:39, Christopher wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:11 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> I've just started trying to look at some Math code with Eclipse.
>>
>> However it's not at all obvious how to create the initial project.
>>
>> I&#x
On 7 January 2015 at 17:57, Christopher wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:47 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 7 January 2015 at 17:39, Christopher wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:11 AM, sebb wrote:
>> >
>> >> I've just started trying to look at s
On 8 January 2015 at 00:25, Gilles wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 17:21:33 +0000, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 7 January 2015 at 17:12, Thomas Neidhart
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/07/2015 06:00 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 7 January 2015 at 16:29,
901 - 1000 of 6366 matches
Mail list logo
