Gary Gregory wrote:
> Part 1: This vote passes.
> Part 2: New name: Commons Imaging
>
> Part 1: This vote passes.
>
> 6 PMC +1s:
> Emmanuel Bourg: Commons Imaging
> Jörg Schaible: Commons Image
My preference was Commons Imaging, see
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel/126
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 28/12/2011 11:06, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
>> just for the record, I am meanwhile on the pmc :-)
>> I was just not aware of the page below, I use:
>> http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#commons-pmc
>
> The page you us
Le 28/12/2011 11:06, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
> just for the record, I am meanwhile on the pmc :-)
> I was just not aware of the page below, I use:
> http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#commons-pmc
The page you use is up to date and probably automatically generated (I
removed
just for the record, I am meanwhile on the pmc :-)
I was just not aware of the page below, I use:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#commons-pmc
Cheers
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Part 1: This vote passes.
> Part 2: New name: Commons Imaging
>
> Part 1
>> Hello,
>> I am no native english speaker, but it seems to me that
>> commons-imaging would suggest image analysis tools, while (as far as I
>> know) sanselan is devoted to IO. In which case, maybe commons-imageio
>> would be better suited?
>
> Although you are possibly right with regards to the
Part 1: This vote passes.
Part 2: New name: Commons Imaging
Part 1: This vote passes.
6 PMC +1s:
Emmanuel Bourg: Commons Imaging
Jörg Schaible: Commons Image
Henri Biestro: Commons Image
James Carman: Commons Imaging
Jochen Wiedmann: Commons Imaging
Gary Gregory: Commons Imaging or Commons ImageI
and from +1, for "Commons ImageIO" or "Commons Imaging". I'll tally this
thread.
Gary
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> 2011/12/22 Sébastien Brisard :
> > Hello,
> > I am no native english speaker, but it seems to me that
> > commons-imaging would suggest image analysis t
2011/12/22 Sébastien Brisard :
> Hello,
> I am no native english speaker, but it seems to me that
> commons-imaging would suggest image analysis tools, while (as far as I
> know) sanselan is devoted to IO. In which case, maybe commons-imageio
> would be better suited?
Although you are possibly rig
Hello,
I am no native english speaker, but it seems to me that
commons-imaging would suggest image analysis tools, while (as far as I
know) sanselan is devoted to IO. In which case, maybe commons-imageio
would be better suited?
Sébastien
---
Hi Mark,
Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 22/12/2011 13:00, Paul Benedict wrote:
>> -0
>> I think project names are ASF property (like a trademark). Without
>> clarification from the board or legal, the vote seems premature.
>
> Projects are free to change the name of a component whenever they like.
> Ch
>> I think every decision can be revisited at any time, if the> participants of
>> this project feel the need to do so. There is no> decision carved in stone
>> and I am pretty surprised you are> "disappointed" just because something is
>> discussed again - after all,> 2.5 years are a long time.
On 22/12/2011 13:00, Paul Benedict wrote:
> -0
> I think project names are ASF property (like a trademark). Without
> clarification from the board or legal, the vote seems premature.
Projects are free to change the name of a component whenever they like.
Changing the name of a TLP requires board a
-0
I think project names are ASF property (like a trademark). Without
clarification from the board or legal, the vote seems premature.
On Dec 22, 2011 5:32 AM, "Mark Thomas" wrote:
> On 19/12/2011 14:54, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > This is a VOTE to [ALL] to rename Commons Sanselan to Commons Image.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > On 19/12/2011 14:54, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> This is a VOTE to [ALL] to rename Commons Sanselan to Commons Image.
> >>
> >> The drive is to have a meaningful obvious name like [
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 19/12/2011 14:54, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> This is a VOTE to [ALL] to rename Commons Sanselan to Commons Image.
>>
>> The drive is to have a meaningful obvious name like [Lang], [IO], [Net],
>> and so on.
>>
>> This VOTE is open until Decembe
On 19/12/2011 14:54, Gary Gregory wrote:
> This is a VOTE to [ALL] to rename Commons Sanselan to Commons Image.
>
> The drive is to have a meaningful obvious name like [Lang], [IO], [Net],
> and so on.
>
> This VOTE is open until December 22, 10AM EST.
-1.
The naming decision was made by the co
2011/12/21 sebb :
> On 21 December 2011 12:14, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Dec 21, 2011, at 7:12, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> I slightly prefer Imaging to Image as well.
>>>
>>> Could also call it JIL - Java Imaging Library - by analogy with JCS and JCI.
>>>
>>> Commons Image
>>> Commons Imaging
>>> Commons
Le 21/12/2011 13:14, Gary Gregory a écrit :
Let's not forget the obvious: imageio.
That fits in the Java 5 and commons naming nicely. Java 5 provides
javax.imageio, which we should take advantage of if possible.
How far do we want to go with javax.imageio integration? Do we intend to
impleme
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2011, at 7:12, sebb wrote:
>
> > I slightly prefer Imaging to Image as well.
> >
> > Could also call it JIL - Java Imaging Library - by analogy with JCS and
> JCI.
> >
> > Commons Image
> > Commons Imaging
> > Commons JIL
> >
> > B
Le 21/12/2011 13:11, sebb a écrit :
Could also call it JIL - Java Imaging Library - by analogy with JCS and JCI.
JIL could be confused with JJIL, another Java image processing library:
http://code.google.com/p/jjil
Emmanuel Bourg
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2011, at 7:12, sebb wrote:
>
>> I slightly prefer Imaging to Image as well.
>>
>> Could also call it JIL - Java Imaging Library - by analogy with JCS and JCI.
>>
>> Commons Image
>> Commons Imaging
>> Commons JIL
>>
>> But I'm not
On 21 December 2011 12:14, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2011, at 7:12, sebb wrote:
>
>> I slightly prefer Imaging to Image as well.
>>
>> Could also call it JIL - Java Imaging Library - by analogy with JCS and JCI.
>>
>> Commons Image
>> Commons Imaging
>> Commons JIL
>>
>> But I'm not sure t
> Let's not forget the obvious: imageio.>> That fits in the Java 5 and commons
> naming nicely. Java 5 provides> javax.imageio, which we should take advantage
> of if possible.>> Gary
nice idea, Gary!!! :)
+1, I like it!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejo
On Dec 21, 2011, at 7:12, sebb wrote:
> I slightly prefer Imaging to Image as well.
>
> Could also call it JIL - Java Imaging Library - by analogy with JCS and JCI.
>
> Commons Image
> Commons Imaging
> Commons JIL
>
> But I'm not sure that's any better than Imaging.
Let's not forget the obvious
I slightly prefer Imaging to Image as well.
Could also call it JIL - Java Imaging Library - by analogy with JCS and JCI.
Commons Image
Commons Imaging
Commons JIL
But I'm not sure that's any better than Imaging.
On 21 December 2011 03:04, James Carman wrote:
> +1 for commons-imaging
> On Dec 1
+1 for commons-imaging
On Dec 19, 2011 12:26 PM, "Matt Benson" wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Emmanuel Bourg
> wrote:
> > +1 for renaming
> >
> > What's the best choice, Commons Images or Commons Image ? I tend to
> prefer
> > the plural form.
>
> Having introduce alternatives, [imag
Commons Image, +1
Henrib
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/ALL-VOTE-Rename-Commons-Sanselan-to-Commons-Image-tp4214365p4217696.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Matt Benson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Emmanuel Bourg
> wrote:
>> +1 for renaming
>>
>> What's the best choice, Commons Images or Commons Image ? I tend to
>> prefer the plural form.
>
> Having introduce alternatives, [imaging] strikes me as even more
> appropriate.
+1
- Jörg
On 19 December 2011 17:16, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/19/11 7:54 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> This is a VOTE to [ALL] to rename Commons Sanselan to Commons Image.
>>
>> The drive is to have a meaningful obvious name like [Lang], [IO], [Net],
>> and so on.
>>
>> This VOTE is open until December 22, 1
Le 19/12/2011 18:25, Matt Benson a écrit :
Having introduce alternatives, [imaging] strikes me as even more appropriate.
You are right, and that's in line with the well known Java Advanced
Imaging API.
Emmanuel Bourg
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> +1 for renaming
>
> What's the best choice, Commons Images or Commons Image ? I tend to prefer
> the plural form.
Having introduce alternatives, [imaging] strikes me as even more appropriate.
Matt
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
>
>
> Le 19/12/2011
+1 for renaming
What's the best choice, Commons Images or Commons Image ? I tend to
prefer the plural form.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 19/12/2011 15:54, Gary Gregory a écrit :
This is a VOTE to [ALL] to rename Commons Sanselan to Commons Image.
The drive is to have a meaningful obvious name like [
On 12/19/11 7:54 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> This is a VOTE to [ALL] to rename Commons Sanselan to Commons Image.
>
> The drive is to have a meaningful obvious name like [Lang], [IO], [Net],
> and so on.
>
> This VOTE is open until December 22, 10AM EST.
>
> Gary
>
Why are we voting on this? This ki
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> I have the feel to express my +1 vote but have Christian's similar
> worries - not sure, but maybe once [vote] successes, there should be a
> resolution... anyway I'm not expert on that field, I just voted
> following my sentim
Hi Gary,
I have the feel to express my +1 vote but have Christian's similar
worries - not sure, but maybe once [vote] successes, there should be a
resolution... anyway I'm not expert on that field, I just voted
following my sentiments.
PS I thought the name comes from joining 2 French words "sans
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> +1 for Image. Like it very much and fits better
>
> But I want to emphasize that I would like to respect the wish of the
> original developer in this case. Probably he has some emotions around
> this and I don't want to force a name cha
36 matches
Mail list logo
