Kinda strange that none of this involves site-dev@ which was the genesis of the
original site.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 13, 2015, at 3:44 AM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
grump
If someone other than me could apply those patches, that'd sure be swell.
This is (the future)
grump
If someone other than me could apply those patches, that'd sure be swell.
This is (the future) projects.apache.org, not humbedooh.apache.org :(
/grump
As for keeping the old site around for a while, I suppose that's an
option, just don't expect infra to maintain it if it keels over ;)
ping?
Le mercredi 11 mars 2015 08:49:23 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
Le mardi 10 mars 2015 13:32:26 Rich Bowen a écrit :
On 03/06/2015 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that
Le vendredi 13 mars 2015 08:44:05 Daniel Gruno a écrit :
grump
If someone other than me could apply those patches, that'd sure be swell.
This is (the future) projects.apache.org, not humbedooh.apache.org :(
/grump
+1
that's why I proposed to even join (and not only stay outside)
As for
Le mardi 10 mars 2015 13:32:26 Rich Bowen a écrit :
On 03/06/2015 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that
projects.a.o has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two
On 03/06/2015 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that
projects.a.o has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites
up. If you object to moving forward with this,
Thanks for the info, Daniel. Updated. In terms of keeping project info updated,
is this info along with all the release info, etc. being pulled from the
project DOAP files? If not, do we still need to maintain them?
Do I need to do anything additional for it to show up in the listing on
On 2015-03-08 19:33, Hitesh Shah wrote:
Thanks for the info, Daniel. Updated. In terms of keeping project info updated,
is this info along with all the release info, etc. being pulled from the
project DOAP files? If not, do we still need to maintain them?
No, if/when projects.apache.org gets
+0.5
I really like the graphics and general idea: that's for sure the way to go!
but before switching, there are some issues to fix, IMHO:
- Whereas the old pages were basic, the new ones have kind of an unusual dark
theme to them and look unpolished (vs. just plain as the old one) (copy/paste
On 2015-03-08 11:12, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
+0.5
I really like the graphics and general idea: that's for sure the way to go!
but before switching, there are some issues to fix, IMHO:
- Whereas the old pages were basic, the new ones have kind of an unusual dark
theme to them and look
Le dimanche 8 mars 2015 11:28:22 Daniel Gruno a écrit :
- Whereas the old pages were basic, the new ones have kind of an unusual
dark theme to them and look unpolished (vs. just plain as the old one)
(copy/paste of another feedback that perfectly summarised a feeling I
could not express
On 2015-03-08 12:47, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Le dimanche 8 mars 2015 11:28:22 Daniel Gruno a écrit :
- Whereas the old pages were basic, the new ones have kind of an unusual
dark theme to them and look unpolished (vs. just plain as the old one)
(copy/paste of another feedback that perfectly
On 03/06/2015 06:08 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
This is really cool stuff, but I want to make sure that our 160++
projects actually understand what's going on (and will take the
responsibility to keep their own info updated here), and that various
outsiders who come to the site to find our
@community.apache.org
Date: Friday, March 6, 2015 at 12:50 PM
To: dev@community.apache.org dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org
Minor design nit: the content boxes should either be centered or do a
better job of auto filling the available
Hi Hitesh,
log onto https://projects-new.apache.org/edit/ and go to the bottom.
Pick 'tez' as the PMC and nothing as the sub-project name, click the
button and start typing :) That will create a tez.json file that the
site will then use.
With regards,
Daniel.
On 2015-03-07 04:56, Hitesh
+1
Antoine
On Mar 6, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen rbo...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that projects.a.o
has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites up. If you
Same question for Apache Tez. How do we need to fix the new website to show the
Tez project?
thanks
— Hitesh
On Mar 6, 2015, at 1:46 PM, Marshall Schor m...@schor.com wrote:
I can see the Apache UIMA entry in the old page, but it's not listed on the
new page. What needs fixing?
On 2015-03-06 23:39, Christopher wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
Question: is there any plan to redirect old URLs?
The old projects.a.o certainly is clunky, but there may well be a few
people who have linked to various parts of the site.
@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org
Minor design nit: the content boxes should either be centered or do a
better job of auto filling the available horizontal space. Otherwise, it
looks spiffy, despite being fairly tiny on my monitor.
Would
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
Question: is there any plan to redirect old URLs?
The old projects.a.o certainly is clunky, but there may well be a few
people who have linked to various parts of the site.
Similarly, are we still using DOAP files?
On 3/6/15 5:40 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 2015-03-06 23:39, Christopher wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org
wrote:
Question: is there any plan to redirect old URLs?
The old projects.a.o certainly is clunky, but there may well be a few
people who
++
-Original Message-
From: Mike Drob md...@mdrob.com
Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org dev@community.apache.org
Date: Friday, March 6, 2015 at 12:50 PM
To: dev@community.apache.org dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org
Question: is there any plan to redirect old URLs?
The old projects.a.o certainly is clunky, but there may well be a few
people who have linked to various parts of the site.
Similarly, are we still using DOAP files? I could imagine that there
are others who were also referring to individual
-To: dev@community.apache.org dev@community.apache.org
Date: Friday, March 6, 2015 at 12:50 PM
To: dev@community.apache.org dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org
Minor design nit: the content boxes should either be centered or do a
better
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 8:53 AM
To: dev
Subject: [VOTE] Replace projects.apache.org with projects-new.apache.org
I'd like for us to go ahead
+1
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 8:53 AM
To: dev
Subject: [VOTE] Replace projects.apache.org with projects-new.apache.org
I'd like for us to go ahead
+1
Hadrian
On 03/06/2015 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that
projects.a.o has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites
up. If you object to moving forward with
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that
projects.a.o has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites
up. If you object to moving forward with this, please say so.
[ ] +1, do it
[ ] +0, whatevs
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 8:53 AM
To: dev
Subject: [VOTE] Replace projects.apache.org with projects-new.apache.org
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace
+ 1.
Suresh
On Mar 6, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen rbo...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that projects.a.o
has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites up. If you
...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 8:53 AM
To: dev
Subject: [VOTE] Replace projects.apache.org with projects-new.apache.org
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that
projects.a.o has, and much more
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org
+1
-Bertrand
+1
On 06/03/15 17:52, Rich Bowen wrote:
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that
projects.a.o has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites
up. If you object to moving forward with this, please
Yes please!
On Mar 6, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen rbo...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that projects.a.o
has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites up. If you
+1
Jacques
Le 06/03/2015 17:52, Rich Bowen a écrit :
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that projects.a.o has,
and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites up. If you object to moving forward with
+1
On 2015-03-06 17:52, Rich Bowen wrote:
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org. It now has
all the functionality that projects.a.o has, and much more, and there's no
reason to have two sites
up. If you object to moving forward with this,
+1
On 6 Mar 2015 17:53, Rich Bowen rbo...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that
projects.a.o has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites
up. If you object to moving
+1, with two comments:
1. the projects page on the new site has a link to Contributors, which is
broken.
2. there's some information linked on the old site about DOAP files and
RSS/Atom feeds, which do not exist (or are not obvious) on the new site.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen rbo...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that projects.a.o
has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites up. If you
object to
Minor design nit: the content boxes should either be centered or do a
better job of auto filling the available horizontal space. Otherwise, it
looks spiffy, despite being fairly tiny on my monitor.
Would also like to see the releases page sort by date by default, and show
more than 10 entries.
I can see the Apache UIMA entry in the old page, but it's not listed on the
new page. What needs fixing?
-Marshall Schor
On 3/6/2015 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that
Just happened to notice that the new website's header seems to be truncated
on mobile.
I use Chrome on Android..
http://imgur.com/8gZfu0i
On 6 Mar 2015 16:53, Rich Bowen rbo...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org. It now
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org.
-0, do we need all these js/css/cookies from google(apis)?
I never had to disable noscript for anything than a.o on a.o until
then,
projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org
Minor design nit: the content boxes should either be centered or do a
better job of auto filling the available horizontal space. Otherwise, it
looks spiffy, despite being fairly tiny on my monitor.
Would also like to see the releases page
44 matches
Mail list logo
