Re: Fwd: A $5B Value: The Code in Linux Foundation Collaborative Projects

2015-10-01 Thread Stefan Reich
And please let's not forget either that *money makes no sense whatsoever*. Cheers PS: It looks like JavaX will be sponsored in the 7 digits range ($, that is). Am 01.10.2015 11:12 schrieb "sebb" : > On 1 October 2015 at 08:19, David Nalley wrote: > > On Wed,

Re: Fwd: A $5B Value: The Code in Linux Foundation Collaborative Projects

2015-10-01 Thread David Nalley
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > This whole process is nonsense In general I agree - CoCoMo is the worst model for valuation (except for all of the others) > > What is important is what economic value does the code produce. If we look at > it

Re: Fwd: A $5B Value: The Code in Linux Foundation Collaborative Projects

2015-10-01 Thread sebb
On 1 October 2015 at 08:19, David Nalley wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Ross Gardler > wrote: >> This whole process is nonsense > > In general I agree - CoCoMo is the worst model for valuation (except > for all of the others) > >> >> What is

Fwd: A $5B Value: The Code in Linux Foundation Collaborative Projects

2015-09-30 Thread jan iversen
Hi. This report is real interesting reading, it could be real cool to do the same math for ASF. Is anybody interested in forming a small work team (a LABS project), and try to do the calculation for ASF ? rgds jan I. -- Forwarded message -- From: Linux Foundation

Re: Fwd: A $5B Value: The Code in Linux Foundation Collaborative Projects

2015-09-30 Thread jan i
Hi Daniel. I know that David gave a keynote (was there) with the numbers you mention, but I imaged making it more "official" like this report, so we have something to sponsors and other interested. We need to promote ASF, and this could be one way of doing it. rgds jan I. On 30 September

Re: Fwd: A $5B Value: The Code in Linux Foundation Collaborative Projects

2015-09-30 Thread Daniel Gruno
Hi Jan, We actually did the math last year for ACEU 2014, I'll try to find it for you. But in short, take the LF number, multiply it by 1.25 and you sort of get to the figures we were discussing back then. This is highly subjective and not in any way an _actual_ science (neither are the LF

RE: Fwd: A $5B Value: The Code in Linux Foundation Collaborative Projects

2015-09-30 Thread Ross Gardler
This whole process is nonsense (not disparaging the work done by people here, it's good to see comparative numbers). My point is, as Daniel says below, it's all subjective. The value is not in how much effort it takes to pump out code - hell I've probably written at least a $B of code by that