and the volunteers on the
diversity list for their thoughts.
Ross
From: Dave Fisher
Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2019 8:23 AM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why should D be a president's committee?
Hi Ross,
Forgive me if this opens up the subject
___
> From: Shane Curcuru
> Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2019 6:23:34 AM
> To: dev@community.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Why should D be a president's committee?
>
> The most important question is: where do the people who are currently
> most active
o: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why should D be a president's committee?
The most important question is: where do the people who are currently
most active doing the real work of the survey and organizing
informational materials on diversity@ want to do that work? Ensuring
they have a productive
The most important question is: where do the people who are currently
most active doing the real work of the survey and organizing
informational materials on diversity@ want to do that work? Ensuring
they have a productive space and framework to work is the first thing to
solve. That said...
On 01/05/2019 12:06, Myrle Krantz wrote:
> When talking about formalizing our D effort, there have been essentially
> three options under discussion:
>
> * Make it a sub-committee of ComDev.
> * Make it a president's committee.
> * Make it it's own PMC.
>
> The current proposal is to make it a
> On May 1, 2019, at 7:06 AM, Myrle Krantz wrote:
>
>
> (Jim, this is an area you should be able to help us shine a light on, given
> your extensive experience at the ASF. You are explicitly invited to
> participate.)
Thx for the invite but I know that any input I'd provide to be moot.
When talking about formalizing our D effort, there have been essentially
three options under discussion:
* Make it a sub-committee of ComDev.
* Make it a president's committee.
* Make it it's own PMC.
The current proposal is to make it a president's committee.
I'm not sure what the advantages
