That's a good idea to meet up.
One of my talks was accepted - Connecting Arduino and Phones with Bluetooth
and Cordova
And they also accepted a lab - Hands on with NFC and Apache Cordova
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Andrew Grieve wrote:
> Yep, I'll be there.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at
I am a +1 now as well.
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Andrew Grieve wrote:
> We've now worked through the issue I was worried about, and have determined
> that the fix is in plugins only. So...
>
> +1 on this release!
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Roy T. F
Sounds great. Thought of just one more thing we may want to mention:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Steven Gill wrote:
> I recommitted the RSS feed earlier today with the item removed. hope that
> fixes that.
>
> Updated blog post below.
>
> ---
> layout: post
> author:
> name: Steve Gi
We've now worked through the issue I was worried about, and have determined
that the fix is in plugins only. So...
+1 on this release!
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2014, at 12:43 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> > A note on best practice. Prior to calling a r
I've only looked at this briefly but it is so welcome! Thanks Mark!
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:33 PM, wrote:
> config-changes.js: Add reapply_global_munge().
>
> Load and apply the full munge from platform json.
> To be used by cordova prepare.
>
>
> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/re
I recommitted the RSS feed earlier today with the item removed. hope that
fixes that.
Updated blog post below.
---
layout: post
author:
name: Steve Gill
url: https://twitter.com/stevesgill
title: "Apache Cordova 3.4.0"
categories: announcements
tags: news releases
---
We are happy to an
Standards are certainly valuable, when bolstered by real world use cases
and data.
Specifically in relation to the networking API, it really is of somewhat
dubious value even if reporting everything correctly, as connectivity at
any given instant has no real bearing on connectivity status in the n
Actually with iOS 7 CTTelephonyNetworkInfo.currentRadioAccessTechnology
(their API docs haven't been updated yet, strange, but it is in the public
header) you can discern which type of cellular radio signal it is now. We
haven't updated our implementation because it is iOS 7 only.
currentRadioAcce
Josh I appreciate your perspective but getting more inputs and outputs from
Cordova and W3C is not a bad thing. Certainly there is a perception of how
standards work. would argue they haven't been working very well: big up
front designs usually fail. Anyhow I welcome prototyping and discussion to
On Feb 19, 2014, at 12:43 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> A note on best practice. Prior to calling a release (i.e. when an RM is
> stepping up to create a release) there should be a "[DISCUSS] release x.y.z"
Some projects do that. Others use an issue tracker (like Jira or a
simple STATUS file). It i
Shazron wrote:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2014Feb/0042.html
>
> our repo: https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-network-information
>
> Good thing we never updated itŠ
Based on the quirks in the documentation, it looks like the API is mostly
useless.
³you¹re
>From that w3c thread, I came across this w3c github org:
https://github.com/w3c-webmob
Seems they are gathering data on what's out there (including Cordova APIs).
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> I've been encouraging w3c members to bring these issue to us and to help us
I've been encouraging w3c members to bring these issue to us and to help us
work through implementation. The relationship so far has been more onus on
us and that was probably not optimal for getting things done. Hopefully we
see them chime in.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Shazron wrote:
>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2014Feb/0042.html
our repo: https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-network-information
Good thing we never updated it...
Yep, I'll be there.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Lisa Seacat DeLuca wrote:
> Taking a poll to see who all is planning on attending ApacheCon and the
> titles of your talks. It'd like to get some time to meetup with other
> Cordova committers while we're there.
>
> Here are the two I planne
A note on best practice. Prior to calling a release (i.e. when an RM is
stepping up to create a release) there should be a "[DISCUSS] release x.y.z"
This provides a place for people to air concerns without affecting the VOTE
thread. Ideally the VOTE thread is just a series of +1s and, in exception
I *think* Andrew means its helpful to have an extra set of eyes. The ideal
would be for us to re-instate that part of the program BEFORE we cut
release bits. A retroactive check doesn't hurt though really it should
never necessary after an RC.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Joe Bowser wrote:
This is only useful if your goal is to never release anything.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Andrew Grieve wrote:
> I think this demonstrates why the vote can be useful. :P
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
>
>> This well illustrates my concern with tying a release t
I think this demonstrates why the vote can be useful. :P
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> This well illustrates my concern with tying a release to a vote thread.
> There is always going to be a reason to -1, there will always be important
> fixes, and there's always going
I spoke to Jesse about the Windows issues. Revoking my -1 as they are
non-critical.
-Original Message-
From: brian.ler...@gmail.com [mailto:brian.ler...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian
LeRoux
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 10:37 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Vote] Cordov
This well illustrates my concern with tying a release to a vote thread.
There is always going to be a reason to -1, there will always be important
fixes, and there's always going to be a delays.
The security issues are definitely worthy of a patch release. I don't see
these windows issues as block
argh. I will see if I can remove it from the rss.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Andrew Grieve wrote:
> Looks like you accidentally uploaded the draft blog post in the RSS feed:
> http://cordova.apache.org/rss.xml
>
> Found it on my Feedly.
>
> Not sure there's anything that can be done about
Looks like you accidentally uploaded the draft blog post in the RSS feed:
http://cordova.apache.org/rss.xml
Found it on my Feedly.
Not sure there's anything that can be done about it though.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Steven Gill wrote:
> Oh I uploaded the docs before I went home today.
-1, only because of issues recently found, I think we should address them
and re-try 3.4.0
>> Isn't that *why* we have release candidates?
Yes, but we should not be adding features between release candidate and
release. In this case it is a pretty critical issue, so having looked at
it more, I t
Yes, it was a "for example" hypothetical.
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Senior Technology Evangelist
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
On 19 February 2014 09:11, Ian Clelland wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Joe Bowser wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 19,
Dialogs are in window now
No need to add anything to manifest or index.html
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-dialogs/pull/16
--
Piotr Zalewa
Mozilla
Do it!
On Feb 19, 2014 3:27 AM, "Gert-Jan Braas" wrote:
> I noticed there are no unit test for firefoxos yet.
>
> Is anybody working on that?
>
> Mayebe thats a nice thing to pick up for me.
>
> Gert-Jan Braas
>
> --
>
> U ademt. Dat hebben wij gepatenteerd.
> Mogen we even v
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Joe Bowser wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
> >
> > In all cases only PMC votes are binding, although it is good community
> > practice to acknowledge all votes. So, for example, if there are 2
> binding
> > -1's, one non-binding -
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
>
> In all cases only PMC votes are binding, although it is good community
> practice to acknowledge all votes. So, for example, if there are 2 binding
> -1's, one non-binding -1 and 3 binding +1's an RM can choose to ignore or
> support the non
This illustrates one of the problems of a <72 hour window. It is a social
guideline that tries to ensure everyone has a chance to have their say.
That being said there are other ways of managing community interest. Since
anyone (including a non-committer) can cut a release and call for a vote it
i
Mark answers your question well. I agree with his assertion. I'll restate
it for (hopefully added) clarity.
The goal is to avoid getting bogged down in votes and rule by committee.
Ultimately, the one doing the work gets to make the decision. So, for
release votes (and other majority consensus vot
Taking a poll to see who all is planning on attending ApacheCon and the
titles of your talks. It'd like to get some time to meetup with other
Cordova committers while we're there.
Here are the two I planned on presenting:
"Crowd Sourcing Translations - A Look at How Apache Cordova's
Documenta
-1
Was hoping that the following 2 changes are added for the Windows Platform.
They may need to be in a major release .
https://github.com/apache/cordova-windows/pull/15 - version of MS Build that is
causing issues due to different combinations of Windows 8 and Windows 8.1, VS
2013 and VS 2014
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 19/02/2014 12:31, Ian Clelland wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Ross Gardler <
> rgard...@opendirective.com>wrote:
> >
> >> It's unfortunate that there are a couple of -1's on the current release
> >> VOTE thread at a time where
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Ian Clelland wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:59 AM, purplecabbage >wrote:
>
> > IMO, If it was not in the release candidate, it should not be pushed into
> > the release.
> >
> > If we need to turn around and do a 3.4.1 to address an issue, then we can
> > do
I could not reproduce your release builds issue on 3.3.1-0.4.2. Could you
please file a JIRA with specifics?
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Bryan Higgins wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> CLI 3.3.1-0.4.2 changed the run command so that "--device" is no longer
> passed down to the platform scripts. BB10 rel
On 19/02/2014 12:31, Ian Clelland wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>
>> It's unfortunate that there are a couple of -1's on the current release
>> VOTE thread at a time where the Cordova project is being asked to improve
>> their release processes. So as to avoid a
Hi Don,
CLI 3.3.1-0.4.2 changed the run command so that "--device" is no longer
passed down to the platform scripts. BB10 relied upon this to start device
detection. I did not notice any communication about this on the list.
Perhaps the implementor didn't know enough about bb10 to know this would
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> It's unfortunate that there are a couple of -1's on the current release
> VOTE thread at a time where the Cordova project is being asked to improve
> their release processes. So as to avoid a potentially bad experience during
> this vote I wan
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:59 AM, purplecabbage wrote:
> IMO, If it was not in the release candidate, it should not be pushed into
> the release.
>
> If we need to turn around and do a 3.4.1 to address an issue, then we can
> do that.
>
Isn't that *why* we have release candidates?
Isn't this jus
On 19 February 2014 09:30, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 18/02/2014 23:26, Steven Gill wrote:
>> Please review and vote on the Cordova 3.4.0 release.
>>
>> You can find the sample release at http://people.apache.org/~steven/
>>
>> Voting will go on for 24 hours.
>
> You should provide hashes and sigs fo
I noticed there are no unit test for firefoxos yet.
Is anybody working on that?
Mayebe thats a nice thing to pick up for me.
Gert-Jan Braas
--
U ademt. Dat hebben wij gepatenteerd.
Mogen we even vangen?
-
Klaar met die sociale onzin? Ins
On 18/02/2014 23:26, Steven Gill wrote:
> Please review and vote on the Cordova 3.4.0 release.
>
> You can find the sample release at http://people.apache.org/~steven/
>
> Voting will go on for 24 hours.
You should provide hashes and sigs for the zips as well. You'll need
them when you upload th
It's unfortunate that there are a couple of -1's on the current release
VOTE thread at a time where the Cordova project is being asked to improve
their release processes. So as to avoid a potentially bad experience during
this vote I want to ensure the community is aware of the voting guidelines
fo
+1
> +1
>
> On 2/18/14 3:26 PM, "Steven Gill" wrote:
>
>> Please review and vote on the Cordova 3.4.0 release.
>>
>> You can find the sample release at http://people.apache.org/~steven/
>>
>> Voting will go on for 24 hours.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> -Steve
>
45 matches
Mail list logo
