+1.
* Ran coho audit -license-headers
* Ran coho verify-tags and validated all the tags
* Created a hello world app to ensure the correct versions of the platforms are
pinned.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Steven Gill [mailto:stevengil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 7,
The tools release can start even before iOS 3.9.1 release as we do semver
dependency for platforms now and when iOS 3.9.1 comes out (which should be
almost simultaneously) it will automatically be picked up.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Steven Gill
This vote has passed. Thanks! Summary of +1s:
- Steven Gill
- Sergey Grebnov
- Nikhil Khandelwal
Since I'm OOF for the rest of the week, Murat will help with publishing the
blog post putting the release out on dist npm.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Steven Gill
Grebnov
-Original Message-
From: Nikhil Khandelwal [mailto:nikhi...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 12:59 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Cordova-android 4.1.0 release (Take 2)
Please review and vote on this 4.1.0 Android Release by replying to this email
Please review and vote on this 4.1.0 Android Release by replying to this email
(and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread)
Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-9394
The archive has been published to dist/dev:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-9394
Note
@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] cordova-android 4.1.0 release
I vote +1:
* Ran mobile-spec against the platform
* Verified the signatures and hashes using coho
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:44 PM Nikhil Khandelwal nikhi...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Please review and vote on this 4.1.0 Android
I agree with your disagreement. :)
+1 to relaxing the condition.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Jesse [mailto:purplecabb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 6:00 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: JSHint breaks the build again
I am sick of seeing my commits cause
'Cordova' github org is good for committers, but it's unclear we have the right
basis (CLAs etc.) for accepting contributions there.
Even though Apache org does not provide us with some features like labels (and
that might change soon), keeping it under that org might be a good path
forward.
There is another JIRA that is needed, that the latest version of the 'camera'
plugin cannot work against released version of iOS. If that's by design (which
is breaking and unfortunate) - the plugin.xml needs to specify that.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Blotsky
Please review and vote on this 4.1.0 Android Release by replying to this email
(and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread)
Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-9394
The archive has been published to dist/dev:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-9394
Note that
+1. Yes, let's do it. Thanks, Shaz!
Let me know if I can help here - though I still don’t have good judgement on
iOS on what should go out and what should not.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: julio cesar sanchez [mailto:jcesarmob...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Cordova-Android 4.1.0
There's always pending PRs, they shouldn't ever determine our release schedule.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:23 AM Nikhil Khandelwal nikhi...@microsoft.com
wrote:
+1. Let's do it. It will be good to get the Android
on this release at all yet. I can start the release process
on Monday but I'm on PTO on the 25th so someone else should really handle this
one.
Cutting releases is a long and frustrating process, and trying to rush it
always leads to disaster.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015, 9:29 AM Nikhil Khandelwal nikhi
...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 7:38 PM
To: Nikhil Khandelwal
Cc: infrastruct...@apache.org
Subject: Re: Github - Ability to add tags to pull requests
Hi Nikhil:
This (and related issues with pull requests) are a frequent request from
projects. So we have a number of things going
like to have
access to that GA account too :)
2015-07-10 4:20 GMT+06:00 Carlos Santana csantan...@gmail.com:
woot! it looks like Andrey helped with this.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:56 PM Nikhil Khandelwal
nikhi...@microsoft.com
wrote:
I've create a JIRA here with all details:
https
Khandelwal
(nikhi...@microsoft.com)
wrote:
I'm closing the doodle now. Thursday July 16th 12 - 2 PM PST has the
maximum folks. Please add it to your calendars. I will send out a
hangout link closer to the event.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Nikhil Khandelwal
This is the broadcast link :
http://youtu.be/FWJPawUs3to
-Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Nikhil Khandelwal [mailto:nikhi...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 12:11 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Cordova July Hangout
Try this for hangout on air:
https
July Hangout
Looks like this link is not hangouts on air. Nikhil is creating a link and will
email it out soon.
-Original Message-
From: Nikhil Khandelwal [mailto:nikhi...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 11:37 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Cordova July Hangout
Looks like this commit [1] breaks mobilespec on all platforms. Test failure log:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/cordova-android-osx/builds/31/steps/running-tests/logs/stdio
Logs here:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/cordova-android-osx/builds/31/steps/gathering-logs/logs/stdio
W/PluginManager(
is hiring!
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Nikhil Khandelwal nikhi...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Looks like this commit [1] breaks mobilespec on all platforms. Test
failure log:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/cordova-android-osx/builds/31/steps/run
ning-tests/logs/stdio
Logs
on Android
I vote +1.
Kindly,
Dmitry
-Original Message-
From: Nikhil Khandelwal [mailto:nikhi...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2015 11:25 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Plugins release - cordova-plugin-file-transfer
Please review and vote on the release
I think we should re-consider our decision to make it read-only in July, since
there is still a fair amount of update activity on the CPR. I'm guessing plugin
developers continue to update CPR because older versions of CLI only supports
CPR newer versions support both CPR NPM.
Removing
+1. Let's do it. It will be good to get the Android implementation of the
'requirements' feature out.
Are there any pending PRs that should be merged :
https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pulls? I don’t know enough about
Android platform to make a call.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original
only use
cordova-windows
Is this a test escape for continues integration, or we don't have it
for
wp8 but we have it for windows?
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 6:17 PM Nikhil Khandelwal
nikhi...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Recent release of cordova-plugin-file-transfer results in a compile
@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Cordova-Android 4.1.0
There's always pending PRs, they shouldn't ever determine our release schedule.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:23 AM Nikhil Khandelwal nikhi...@microsoft.com
wrote:
+1. Let's do it. It will be good to get the Android implementation
logic also. Granted, coho releases would be simpler without the suffix,
however, I don't think it is currently worth the change.
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Nikhil Khandelwal nikhi...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Now that we know how to fix the plugin to work with 'dev
I remember seeing a PR, that mentioned content:// was not working because of
the whitelist plugin not supporting it when '*' was specified and/or because
CSP did not include it. That PR and discussion did not go anywhere:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-whitelist/pull/6
I have myself
Coming back to Joe's point of if the browser has the API, then the plugin
should not implement it. Is there a way for a plugin to not clobber the
namespace if the browser already implements it? This would be a nice way to
support Android 5+ with the browser implementation and the older version
: Monday, July 6, 2015 10:16 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cordova July Hangout
Let's do it!
On Jul 1, 2015 10:57 AM, Nikhil Khandelwal nikhi...@microsoft.com wrote:
I was wondering if it is a good time for a hangout. Here are few good
topics for discussion:
1. Re-working
Should we also release the current master for Android as 4.1? It's long
overdue.
Though one advantage of doing 4.0.3 is that it does not require an accompanying
TOOLS release as we use support patch version semver upgrades in the previous
version of the TOOLS.
Thanks,
Nikhil
: Re: Google Analytics on Cordova Docs
Hi Nikhil.
What's the due date for this? I'm currently bloated with work, but I can help
perhaps starting next July 20th.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:30 AM Nikhil Khandelwal nikhi...@microsoft.com
wrote:
We just setup a new GA account for Cordova project. All
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-9248 highlights a testing gap with our
release process:
* cordova-plugin-whitelist should not have been released with having
iOS platform = 4.0 without iOS platform release. While reverting the 'latest'
tag was a good move to get this fixed, it
We just setup a new GA account for Cordova project. All of the Cordova PMC has
access to the GA account, we'll have to figure out how to provide you access.
We need to update the current set of docs with the new GA ID for it to generate
any data currently. Would you be able to help with that?
+1 on moving to new npm dependency. There are a bunch of JIRAs (around proxy
support) that would be resolved with the latest greatest dependencies.
As for making the CPR read-only, there is still some usage of this:
Last updated from the CPR:
5 hours ago com.purplebrain.adbuddiz.sdk
12
The path to the keystore is relative depending on your context. It's relative
to build.json when specified there. It's relative to the your current working
directory when specified as a command line argument. Using '..\' - you should
be able to move out of the cordova project directory.
Also,
Welcome, Jason! Great to see your contributions to the webOS platform.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Jason Robitaille [mailto:jason.robitai...@lge.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2015 2:09 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re-Introductions
Hi all,
Wanted to reintroduce
I was wondering if it is a good time for a hangout. Here are few good topics
for discussion:
1. Re-working cordova-lib - cordova platform interactions. Review new
API - Vladimir https://github.com/cordova/cordova-discuss/pull/9
2. Status of testing infrastructure - what are the
Recent release of cordova-plugin-file-transfer results in a compile error with
the released version of cordova-wp8. I think this needs to be fixed and
re-released.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-9275
PR: https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-file-transfer/pull/91
I'm going
I think our cordova plugin registry (plugins.cordova.io) requires us to use old
version of npm - 1.3.4. When we make the cordova plugin registry read-only
(very soon) - we will be able to move to a newer version of npm.
-Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: huz's gmail
:
The main thing is pluggable webview support in the platform, i.e.
WKWebView. Don't have time to write this up (since, I like to
remind
people, I work on this alone, hint hint). I'll write it up
once I
get
the merge going.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Nikhil Khandelwal
nikhi
, and not a bug in the plugin.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Nikhil Khandelwal
nikhi...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Would it not be better to remove the iOS implementation from the
whitelist plugin, so that it's install can be successful all the
people using iOS 3.8 and Android 4.0
I would love to see a high level summary of what's in the 4.0.x branch? I have
not been closely keeping tab of this branch. We'll need to prepare such a
summary anyway - when blogging and doing a release notes about it anyway.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: tommy-carlos
Would it not be better to remove the iOS implementation from the whitelist
plugin, so that it's install can be successful all the people using iOS 3.8 and
Android 4.0?
When iOS 4.0 release happens, this support could be added back.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Jesse
to cordova.js as default, but
also allow a path to be passed in.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Nikhil Khandelwal
nikhi...@microsoft.com
wrote:
From what I understand, the grunt:compile option and generation of
cordova.js is part of a committer-only workflow when an update
There is a massive PR currently in the works that is looking to change how
platforms should expose their functionality:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/179
It leans on using node modules and 'require' as opposed to executing shell
scripts. Steve: As you try building these new
Accompanying platforms where the checks are implemented need to be released. We
should push out a release for Android, iOS soon.
Windows support for this has already been released.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:raymondcam...@gmail.com]
Sent:
From what I understand, the grunt:compile option and generation of cordova.js
is part of a committer-only workflow when an update to cordova.js is made and a
platform specific cordova.js file needs to be updated in the platform repo. Use
of devdependencies in npm using verion numbers almost
Tools Release June 1, 2015
The vote has now closed. The results are:
Positive binding votes:
- Murat Sutunc
- Nikhil Khandelwal
- Tim Barham
No negative votes.
The vote has passed.
Thanks,
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Murat Sutunc [mailto:mura...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 4
Let us know when you have done that. We can verify the archive for voting.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Steven Gill [mailto:stevengil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 2:49 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Tools Release June 4th
Good catch. That
I have a blog post up here for review:
https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/pull/40
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Nikhil Khandelwal [mailto:nikhi...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 10:55 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Cordova-windows 4.0.0
+1.
I verified the following:
* Confirmed signature with `coho verify-archive`
* Manually verified tags
* Verified it picks up the 3.7.2 version of Android.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Tim Barham [mailto:tim.bar...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 9:41 AM
To:
I was looking to make a blog post for the Windows release, but I could not find
the docs for Windows 10 on the edge version of the published docs website. How
often are the docs published to the edge website?
This commit introduced the change to the cordova-docs repo:
50f1d88 - Merge branch
The vote has been closed. The results are:
Positive binding votes:
- Sergey Grenov
- Jesse
- Nikhil Khandelwal
No negative votes.
The vote has passed. I will shortly follow the next steps for the release.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Nikhil Khandelwal [mailto:nikhi
cordova returning version 5.1.0
Yeah, 5.1.0 was published as RC so we could test it.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
I see the 'latest' tag as 5.0.0? That is what is associated with the
dist tarball you see.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Nikhil Khandelwal
Why does npm info cordova - give me 5.1.0 version which points to cordova 5.0.0
tgz? See the lines below in asterisk.
{ name: 'cordova',
description: 'Cordova command line interface tool',
'dist-tags':
{ latest: '5.0.0',
rc: '5.1.0',
'3.6.0-0.2.8': '3.6.0-0.2.8',
nightly:
Don't we have to publish the plugin to npm for this to be picked up? I think
npm does not look at the git repo itself. Also, we might as well remove the
license, ASF does not require docs to have the license header - only sources.
.md files should ideally be part of RAT excludes.
reviewed licenses
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Nikhil Khandelwal nikhi...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Please review and vote on this Windows Release by replying to this
email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread)
Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira
+1 to having the plugin docs fixed. It's probably just about removing the
offending HTML comments and doing a plugin release.
-Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Steven Gill [mailto:stevengil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2015 2:10 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Cc: Joerg Holz
Please review and vote on this Windows Release by replying to this email (and
keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread)
Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-9064
Cordova-windows have been published to:
dist/dev:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-9064/
The
I am late to this discussion, but I just started a Windows 4.0.0 platform
release and would like to do a tools release after that to pin this Windows
release. I'm not sure if there is a guideline around this - and wonder if it
makes sense to combine the two TOOLS releases.
Thanks,
Nikhil
To do the Windows release, I was following the steps outlined here:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/platforms-release-process.md
In one of the steps, I ran into an issue.
coho tag-release --version 4.0.0 -r windows --pretend
Running from d:\cordova
cordova-windows/
4.0, the
third-party Java dependencies, has no documentation, and we're basically
directing people to Crosswalk as the way to do this. We should really be
adding the documentation, and if anyone wants to take that on, that'd be
awesome.
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:06 PM Nikhil Khandelwal nikhi
CORS does not apply for local content using file:///, hence, browser will allow
all XHRs when your origin is local. When you host content on remoteserver.com
CORS is applied. If you make an XHR to xhr.com, the browser will pre-flight a
request to xhr.com asking if xhr.com supports xhr access
know the issue so
I can investigate it. Been working fine for me.
Cheers,
-Steve
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Nikhil Khandelwal nikhi...@microsoft.com
wrote:
I'm new to this area. Steve: Can you provide some background on the
motivation for this change? In particular, what
Does anyone have reason to delay this release? This is the first release with
Windows 10 support and has a breaking change that requires an accompanying
tools release. Hence, I propose we version it 4.0.0
Here are the next steps:
- Prepare blog for the release include details of
I'm new to this area. Steve: Can you provide some background on the motivation
for this change? In particular, what is the advantage of this workflow, over
the existing one:
I have also made some changes to cordova-lib which will copy the contents of
cordova-js-src into platform_www when a
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] wp8@3.8.1, windows@3.8.2, android@4.0.1 release
I will start a discuss thread today
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Nikhil Khandelwal nikhi...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Steve,
Any update on the patch release for TOOLS to include pinned version of
these platforms?
Thanks
Is there a list of cordova-android 4.0 APIs that have been removed? I think a
migration guide from Androind 3.7.1 = Androind 4.0.0 would be super useful.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 7:02 AM
To:
The next version of cordova-windows will be 4.0.0 as it has Win10 support
(which is a significant update) and this breaking change. Agreed, if there is
an engine tag that can make this more explicit - it would be perfect.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Steven Gill
Now that we know how to fix the plugin to work with 'dev' versions of
platforms, we could keep the 'dev' suffix. It's somewhat useful for anyone
using our 'master' branch (I'm hoping its mostly the dev team) and adding the
platform and have the dev prefix listed here:
λ cordova platform ls
Steve,
Any update on the patch release for TOOLS to include pinned version of these
platforms?
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Tim Barham [mailto:tim.bar...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 6:27 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] wp8@3.8.1,
out '-dev' suffix?
Yes. I never liked having a version suffix, I never understood why we needed
it. I would prefer we discuss removing it entirely instead of working around
it. Am I missing something?
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Nikhil Khandelwal nikhi
For platform releases, we would have to test it with the oldest version of
the CLI that could potentially pull it down.
This one worries me a bit in terms of the testing burden and the version matrix
that we will need to support.
Totally in favor of having patch versions be available right
On the flip side, if we do not update cordova-js with the latest on its master,
we would have found this bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8996 much
later - only when the cordova.js would have merged to the platform repo - which
I believe happens only around the time of a release?
Why does cordova-lib npm package depend on cordova-js package? Is this only a
dev-dependency required for npm test and CI scenarios?
Thanks,
Nikhil
, platforms should see the use of access tags and
encourage users to use one of the whitelist plugins if they have not already
done so.
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Nikhil Khandelwal nikhi...@microsoft.com
wrote:
There is a bunch of confusion with Cordova 5.0 users because of these
two
changes
to see if I can fix marky-markdown myself. If it isn't easy, we
could just update our readme's and republish.
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Nikhil Khandelwal nikhi...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Thanks, Steven! Do you have a pointer to the issue? In case they can't
get do this soon - perhaps we should
* Verified signatures and hashes
* Verified tags
* Verified plugins added correctly to blank app
* Verified blank app can be successfully ran and built
* Ran smoke testing of mobilespec app
* Performed manual ad-hoc testing
* Verified Release Notes
I vote +1.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original
Yup. Thanks! Good to see cordova is installable again!
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Murat Sutunc [mailto:mura...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2015 1:45 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Rapid release of tools
Ahh, thanks Steven for all the work!
There is a bunch of confusion with Cordova 5.0 users because of these two
changes:
1. Move to npm for plugins (There have been multiple PRs trying to update
plugin docs to reference the old id instead of the new one - because people are
still using the old version of the CLI)
2. No network
This is breaking npm install of all recent versions of cordova:
λ npm install cordova
npm WARN engine cordova-js@3.9.0: wanted: {node:~0.10.x} (current:
{node:0.12.0,npm:2.5.1})
npm WARN engine npm@1.3.4: wanted: {node:=0.6,npm:1} (current:
{node:0.12.0,npm:2.5.1})
npm WARN engine
: No Readme for plugin packages on npm
I filed the issue a few days ago with npm. They are working on fixing it.
The parser is struggling with html comments On Apr 23, 2015 6:14 PM, Nikhil
Khandelwal nikhi...@microsoft.com wrote:
It looks like npm cannot find the readme for plugin packages:
https
All the best, Andrew! Thanks for being so responsive and taking a look at so
many of my PRs!
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Murat Sutunc [mailto:mura...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 9:26 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Also moving to a new team
Best
Any update on updating the plugins on CPR?
CPR still points to the old version and the CLI will not re-direct to the new
location in npm (only a warning) when the old id is specified.
-Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: agri...@google.com [mailto:agri...@google.com] On Behalf Of Andrew
I'm not familiar with how docs get published to our website. I see the last
version that was published was 4.0.0. By default, search results lead to this
version and they are quite outdated. Should we publish a 5.0.0 version now that
the tools release is out?
Also, does the doc version match
Please ignore this - I'm just catching up on my e-mail and saw the discuss
thread for the docs release. It would be a good to get an idea of the
versioning aspect though.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Nikhil Khandelwal [mailto:nikhi...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, April
It looks like npm cannot find the readme for plugin packages:
https://www.npmjs.com/package/cordova-plugin-battery-status
Github can find it just fine though:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-battery-status
Thanks,
Nikhil
Support for iOS is in this PR now:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/138
It allows you to specify a signing identity and a provisioning profile using
command line arguments or build.json.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Nikhil Khandelwal [mailto:nikhi
, into
the matrix.
Your thoughts?
-ningxin
-Original Message-
From: Nikhil Khandelwal [mailto:nikhi...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2015 6:59 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Buildbot for Cordova on Apache Infra - Update
Here are the next steps to add Firefox OS
This is great!
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 1:34 PM
To: bui...@apache.org
Subject: Additional Travis-CI Capacity
FYI:
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/apache_gains_additional_travis_ci
failing tests.
-Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Piotr Zalewa [mailto:pzal...@mozilla.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2015 3:47 PM
To: dev
Subject: RE: Buildbot for Cordova on Apache Infra - Update
What would you need to have Firefox os on it?
24 mar 2015 02:10 Nikhil Khandelwal nikhi
on this.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Nikhil Khandelwal
nikhi...@microsoft.com
wrote:
This is a good one to take in before release, since it changes
config.xml
schema: https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/202. It
needs to
be
code reviewed
-cli@master
- Bug says it's fixed in Android 5.1.1 (API level 22). (thanks for
finding that okio issue!)
On a side note - should we switch our targetSdk to 22? Probably...?
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Nikhil Khandelwal
nikhi...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Why am I seeing this crash
Yes, we need it to setup an instance of CouchDB. Our longstanding INFRA ticket
on this subject has not received much love. Having the VM should unblock us.
What are the next steps to get access to it to setup a couchDB instance?
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Parashuram N
, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com
wrote:
yes, it would be great if we could get access to it and setup a
couchdb instance that replicates CPR
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Nikhil Khandelwal
nikhi...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Yes, we need it to setup an instance of CouchDB. Our
The JIRA which was marked as 'Won't fix' is currently blocking Android test
runs on http://ci.cordova.io: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8431.
It looks like Android L's implementation of OkHttp has a race condition which
hits quite consistently with our current file transfer tests.
Subject: Re: Jira CB-831: File transfer tests crash on Android L
This is a Won't Fix because we're not bundling OkHttp anymore. This will be
resolved when we release Cordova-Android 4.0.0
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 5:27 PM Nikhil Khandelwal nikhi...@microsoft.com
wrote:
The JIRA which was marked
This is a good one to take in before release, since it changes config.xml
schema: https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/202. It needs to be code
reviewed.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:panar...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Monday, April 6,
...@google.com [mailto:agri...@google.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Grieve
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 4:48 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
Left some comments on the PR.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Nikhil Khandelwal nikhi...@microsoft.com
wrote:
I just submitted a PR
Thanks, Michael for the detailed information. On a related note, who owns
http://ci.cordova.io/ ?
It seems to be running an old/stale version of medic + BuildBot. There is a
newer version now hosted on Apache Infra but it's got a long url :
101 - 200 of 225 matches
Mail list logo
