RE: [DISCUSS] cordova-windows patch release

merge and include CB-10927 [1] ? [1]: https://github.com/apache/cordova-windows/pull/163 On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:47 AM Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) < v-vlk...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Hi all > > We'd like to do a cordova-windows patch release to fix the following > issu

RE: [DISCUSS] Tools Release CLI/LIB 6.1.1

AM, Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) > <v-vlk...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > Carlos, I've reviewed and merged these PRs. However the only two PRs that > need to be included into this release are #415 [1] and #416 [2]. The other > two are for cordova-common and I guess we have nothing to

[DISCUSS] cordova-windows patch release

Hi all We'd like to do a cordova-windows patch release to fix the following issues: * CB-10845 Invalidate manifest cache in prepare (a4c673e3) * CB-10714 Ignore case for --archs (49812d44) * CB-10138 Adds missing plugin metadata to plugin_list module for Windows (45e5bd13) The proposed

[VOTE] Tools release attempt 2

Please review and vote on this Tools Release by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread) Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-10980 Both tools have been published to dist/dev: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-10980 The packages were

RE: [Vote] Tools Release

problem we should fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-10961 On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 8:51 AM Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) < v-vlk...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Please review and vote on this Tools Release by replying to this email > (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread)

RE: 6.1.0 (cordova-lib@undefined) ?

Any way we should follow process as normal, do a CLI bug/patch 6.1.1 and have a [DISCUSS] on what should be in it like any bugs already fix in master and anything else that is almost ready/fix On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:18 AM Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) < v-vlk...@microsoft.com> wrote:

RE: [DISCUSS] Tools Release CLI/LIB 6.1.1

Carlos, I've reviewed and merged these PRs. However the only two PRs that need to be included into this release are #415 [1] and #416 [2]. The other two are for cordova-common and I guess we have nothing to do with them for now. Summarizing, the release notes for 6.1.1 will look like this: ###

RE: 6.1.0 (cordova-lib@undefined) ?

e removing the cordova-common, let's do that in next patch release maybe a 6.1.2, right now at least is critical for my work to get a working 6.1.1, people are already using 6.1.0 and broke [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-10961 On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 8:58 AM Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon

RE: 6.1.0 (cordova-lib@undefined) ?

this `bundleDependencies` section? - Best regards, Vladimir -Original Message- From: Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) [mailto:v-vlk...@microsoft.com] Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 9:40 AM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: RE: 6.1.0 (cordova-lib@undefined) ? I'll take care of it - Best regards, Vladimir

[Vote] Tools Release

Please review and vote on this Tools Release by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread) Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-10902 Tools have been published to dist/dev: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-10902/ The packages were

RE: 6.1.0 (cordova-lib@undefined) ?

I'll take care of it - Best regards, Vladimir -Original Message- From: Steven Gill [mailto:stevengil...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 7:11 PM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: Re: 6.1.0 (cordova-lib@undefined) ? Shoot! So I am checking this out at the airport. So usually

RE: [DISCUSS] Cordova-browser release

Kotikov (Akvelon) < v-vlk...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Friendly pinging... > > - > Best regards, Vladimir > > -Original Message- > From: Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) [mailto:v-vlk...@microsoft.com] > Sent: Friday, March 4, 2016 5:57 PM > To: dev@cordova.a

[Vote] Cordova-browser 4.1.0 Release

Please review and vote on this Cordova-browser 4.1.0 Release by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread) Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-10788 The archive has been published to dist/dev: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-10788

RE: [DISCUSS] Cordova-browser release

Hey, guys. Here is a release notes for this release: ### 4.1.0 (Mar 04, 2016) * CB-10788 Updated checked in node_modules * CB-10650 Non-index content.src causes Splashscreen to be not displayed on browser * CB-9836 Add .gitattributes to prevent CRLF line endings in repos * CB-9669 Browser exec

RE: [DISCUSS] Cordova-Android 5.2.0 Release

Steve, do you plan to update bundled `cordova-common` as a part of this release? - Best regards, Vladimir -Original Message- From: Steven Gill [mailto:stevengil...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:12 PM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Cordova-Android

RE: [DISCUSS] Old platforms support deprecation

Hey, guys. I've opened a PR that adds a message about deprecation. Could anybody please review that? The only question I wanted to know your opinion on is where we should print this message. In the PR above cordova-lib will show it each time when polyfill is instantiated and this might be

RE: [DISCUSS] Cordova-common 1.1.0 release

elease build or just > bundle dependency with release build. > > I think in npm3 npmshrinkwrap function was improved to be more > deterministic > > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 7:50 AM Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) < > v-vlk...@microsoft.com> wrote: > >&g

RE: [Vote] Cordova common 1.1.0 Release

> * Ran coho verify-archive > * Verified tag > * Built and ran blank app on windows and android platforms using this > cordova-common module > > -Original Message- > From: Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) [mailto:v-vlk...@microsoft.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016

RE: [DISCUSS] Cordova-common 1.1.0 release

, 2016, at 5:23 AM, Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) <v-vlk...@microsoft.com> wrote: >> cordova-windows won't as it has the dependency listed as ^1.0.0 which >> includes minor releases. > IMO since cordova-common is a bundled dependency, we still need for new > relea

RE: [DISCUSS] Cordova-common 1.1.0 release

gt; > > cordova-windows won't as it has the dependency listed as ^1.0.0 > > which includes minor releases. > > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) < > > v-vlk...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, guys. > > > I'm p

[Vote] Cordova common 1.1.0 Release

Please review and vote on this Cordova-common Release by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread) Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-10626 Both tools have been published to dist/dev: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-10626/ The

[DISCUSS] Cordova-common 1.1.0 release

Hi, guys. I'm planning to do a minor release for cordova-common. Here is the list of JIRAs to be resolved in this release (aka RELEASENOTES): * CB-10052 Improve superspawn to allow to handle spawned process io streams * CB-10176 Cordova-common should contain a default logger implementation *

RE: [VOTE] Plugins Release

, Alexander Sorokin -Original Message- From: Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) [mailto:v-vlk...@microsoft.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2016 10:08 PM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Plugins Release Please review and vote on the release of this plugins release by replying to this email

[VOTE] Plugins Release

Please review and vote on the release of this plugins release by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread) Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-10557 The plugins have been published to dist/dev: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-10557

RE: [DISCUSS] Plugin patch release

I'm going to start vote soon. Here is updated release notes for this release: ## cordova-plugin file ### 4.1.1 (Feb 09, 2016) * Edit package.json license to match SPDX id * [CB-10419](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-10419) cordova-plugin-file 4.0.0 error with browserify workflow ##

[REVIEW] Plugins release blog post

Please review and comment: https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/495 - Best regards, Vladimir - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org

RE: [DISCUSS] Enabling coverage reports collection and analysis for cordova repos

Steve said don't go mad and kill your self looking trying reach 100% for the repo, use it in a way that make sense. On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 7:34 AM Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) < v-vlk...@microsoft.com> wrote: > This is not only about visualization. > Codecov also stores previous result a

RE: [REVIEW] cordova-windows 4.3.1 blog post

Please review and comment: https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/485 - Best regards, Vladimir - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org

RE: [VOTE] InAppBrowser Plugin Release

I vote +1. * Verified signatures and hashes * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the repo * Ran plugin auto tests to ensure they are passing - Best regards, Vladimir -Original Message- From: Alexander Sorokin (Akvelon) [mailto:v-als...@microsoft.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016

[REVIEW] cordova-windows 4.3.1 blog post

Please review and comment: https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/485 - Best regards, Vladimir - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org

RE: [VOTE] Cordova windows 4.3.1 release

=risingj.com=01%7c01%7cv-alsoro%40microsoft.com%7c1444a653c28d4485995808d32b7083bb%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1=DwZ3uTDNba3mg6v7jGU31SmA5TLx1xoSh54EdbSPDnQ%3d On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) < v-vlk...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Please review

RE: [DISCUSS] Enabling coverage reports collection and analysis for cordova repos

PM, Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) > <v-vlk...@microsoft.com> wrote: > >> What is the impact to our workflow? are we just adding a node dependency, or >> are there other config/integration parts that we need to do? > The only thing, required from our side is to replace

[VOTE] Cordova windows 4.3.1 release

Please review and vote on this cordova-windows 4.3.1 release by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread) Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-10495 The archive has been published to dist/dev: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-10495

RE: [DISCUSS] Enabling coverage reports collection and analysis for cordova repos

> Though I do believe it is important not to chase 100% code coverage. > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 6:21 AM, Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) < > v-vlk...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > > Hey, guys > > > > I've spent a couple of hours and have a prototype of how we c

[DISCUSS] Enabling coverage reports collection and analysis for cordova repos

Hey, guys I've spent a couple of hours and have a prototype of how we can visualize, track and analyze code coverage for our repos. Here is the fork of cordova-lib repo integrated with codecov.io [1] (notice the coverage badge at the top of README), and a PR with some coverage metrics [2]. The

[DISCUSS] Cordova windows 4.3.1 release

Hi all We're planning to do a patch release of cordova-windows (proposed version is 4.3.1) to address some regressions. Here is the patches to be included in this release: * CB-10394 Do not cache manifest file while getting package name * CB-10446 Windows 10 Cordova Application

RE: [DISCUSS] Old platforms support deprecation

we have not released a platform API > implementation and do not plan to e.g. WP8, WebOS, Ubuntu - we should > support them for longer unless the cost is significant. > > -Nikhil > > -Original Message- > From: Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) [mailto:v-vlk...@microsoft

RE: [DISCUSS] Old platforms support deprecation

he update by then. OSX already has a PR for PlatformAPI changes. I think this sounds fine. Deprecated platforms would still work with old versions of cordova. On Jan 22, 2016 6:58 AM, "Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon)" < v-vlk...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Hi guys. > > Starting from upcom

[DISCUSS] Old platforms support deprecation

Hi guys. Starting from upcoming cordova release (6.0.0) we have PlatformApi implemented and used by three major platforms (Android, iOS and Windows). This means that we now have a lot of code in cordova-lib which exists there only for maintaining compatibility with previous platforms versions.

RE: [Vote] Windows 4.3.0 Release

: missing semver dependency. I vote -1. -Original Message- From: Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) [mailto:v-vlk...@microsoft.com] Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 5:08 PM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: [Vote] Windows 4.3.0 Release Please review and vote on this 4.3.0 Windows Release by replying

RE: [DISCUSS] Cordova-windows 4.3.0 release

-Original Message- From: Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) [mailto:v-vlk...@microsoft.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 4:18 PM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] Cordova-windows 4.3.0 release Hi all, I plan to do a minor cordova-windows release (bump to 4.3.0) to release PlatformApi

[Vote] Windows 4.3.0 Release attempt 2

Please review and vote on this 4.3.0 Windows Release (2nd attempt) by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread) Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-10299 The archive has been published to dist/dev:

[REVIEW] cordova-windows 4.3.0 blog post

Please review and comment: https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/453 - Best regards, Vladimir - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org

[Vote] Windows 4.3.0 Release

Please review and vote on this 4.3.0 Windows Release by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread) Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-10299 The archive has been published to dist/dev: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-10299 The

[DISCUSS] Cordova-windows 4.3.0 release

Hi all, I plan to do a minor cordova-windows release (bump to 4.3.0) to release PlatformApi and unified logging feature in the next couple of days. Please leave your comments and notes. Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-10299 - Best regards, Vladimir

RE: Purpose of pre_package hook for windows

Corporation -Original Message- From: Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) [mailto:v-vlk...@microsoft.com] Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 2:27 AM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: RE: Purpose of pre_package hook for windows So, the only problem here is when plugin (or user) decides to modify www

RE: Purpose of pre_package hook for windows

AFY%3d @purplecabbage https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=risingj.com=01%7c01%7cv-segreb%40microsoft.com%7c53012f7781224cf8372e08d300e505dc%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1=wW%2bKeY6MmNVcIOVrceLfhfpkMeUTCTbAsBrbCpkkXwg%3d On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Vladimir Kotikov (Akve

Purpose of pre_package hook for windows

Hi, guys. Could anyone please shed some light on the subject? Looking into PR for 'nohooks' option [1] I realized that we have a logic in Windows/wp8 parsers that fires a hooks, specific for these particular platforms. I see 2 problems with this: 1. This doesn't fits well into the

RE: [Vote] Tools Release Cordova 5.4.1

I vote +1 * Ran coho -verify archive over RC archives * Ran npm test for relevant repos, checked out to release tag * Verified that mobilespec, created with old cli builds and runs successfully - Best regards, Vladimir -Original Message- From: Alexander Sorokin (Akvelon)

RE: [Vote] 4.2.0 Windows Release

I vote +1 * Verified release candidate with 'coho verify-archive' * Verified that blank app created and built successfully * Verified that upgrade from previous version succeeds - Best regards, Vladimir -Original Message- From: Alexander Sorokin (Akvelon)

RE: CLI broke orientation settings?

The orientation is still handled by LIB (except cordova-android), so this is probably tools-related. - Best regards, Vladimir. -Original Message- From: Steven Gill [mailto:stevengil...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 7:51 PM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: Re: CLI broke

RE: [VOTE] iOS 3.9.2 release

-Original Message- From: Shazron [mailto:shaz...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2015 3:34 AM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] iOS 3.9.2 release +1 On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) <v-vlk...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Please review

[REVIEW] Cordova-ios 3.9.2 blog post

Please review and comment it here: https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/408 - Best regards, Vladimir

RE: [VOTE] Cordova-common 1.0.0 release

d cordova-lib tests pass when npm linked cordova-common > * Created hello world app using cordova-cli > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:28 AM, Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) < > v-vlk...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > > Please review and vote on this Cordova-common Relea

[DISCUSS] Cordova-ios 3.9.2 release

Created this thread to separate discussions for 3.9.2 and 4.0.0 releases I'm going to start 3.9.2 release today if no one have any objections. - Best regards, Vladimir - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org

[VOTE] iOS 3.9.2 release

Please review and vote on this 3.9.2 iOS Release by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread) Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-9912 The archive has been published to dist/dev: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-9912 The

RE: [DISCUSS] Tools Release

, October 29, 2015 5:49 AM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Tools Release What's the latest status on this? cordova-android master being fixed to make it green again? On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:28 AM Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) < v-vlk...@microsoft.com> wrote: > This

RE: [Vote] 3.10.0 Cordova App Hello World Release

I vote +1 * Ran coho verify-archive successfully * Created blank application using cordova-app-hello-world@3.10.0, build and ran successfully - Best regards, Vladimir -Original Message- From: Carlos Santana [mailto:csantan...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 5:20 AM To:

[VOTE] Cordova-common 1.0.0 release

Please review and vote on this Cordova-common Release by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread) Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-9899 Packages have been published to dist/dev: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-9899/ The

RE: [VOTE] Cordova-common release

> * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the repo > * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and > subdependencies have Apache-compatible licenses > * Ran coho verify-archive successfully. > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) < > v-vlk.

RE: [DISCUSS] Tools Release

This is fixed in https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/commit/78fa7374d97ad9ed85c5c857a77a8f3830d600f9. However tests are still failing locally, but this seems to be a problem with tests, not LIB/Android. Alex Sorokin is looking into this. - Best regards, Vladimir -Original

RE: [Discuss] Cordova-common release

get's tested from cordova-lib > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:46 PM Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > DO IT! > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) < >

RE: [DISCUSS] cordova-ios 4.0.0 release

Hi, guys. We've cherry-picked all the commits related to iOS9 / Xcode 7 issues into 3.9.x and send corresponding PR to 3.9.x branch [1]. Shazrov, Steve please review when possible. Regarding new board for 3.9.2 release - neither Sergey nor me don't have a permissions to create a shared

[VOTE] Cordova-common release

Please review and vote on this Cordova-common Release by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread) Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-9850 Both tools have been published to dist/dev: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-9850/ The

RE: [Discuss] Cordova-common release

So if there is no -1, I'm going to start VOTE thread tomorrow. - Best regards, Vladimir -Original Message- From: Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) [mailto:v-vlk...@microsoft.com] Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 2:09 PM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: RE: [Discuss] Cordova-common release

RE: [DISCUSS] Cordova-Android 5.0.x

+1 FYI, there is a finishing stroke - [ab72e48] CB-9782 Check in cordova-common dependency [1] which is needed for scenario when user installs platform from git. I also went through release steps and didn't found any issues. --- [1]

RE: [Discuss] Cordova-common release

ution > either. > > > > > >I agree that we should be going towards smaller modules and not > > >having a > > case of cordovaLib1, cordovaLib2, etc. I think this is still going > > to be a work in progress and will take some time. > > > > > >

RE: [DISCUSS] CocoaPods dependencies for iOS plugins

Hey, guys. After ios refactoring the handling definitely will be a part of platform. As for tag, I guess it make sense to keep this logic in LIB and let cordova itself check availability of cocoapods/nuget. - Best regards, Vladimir -Original Message- From: Steven Gill

PlatformApi implementation for cordova-android

Hi, list. I've finished with refactoring cordova-android tooling to expose PlatformApi contract, so platform could be used as a regular node module. You can review pull request here: https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/226 A few highlights on this PR: * Platform now exposes all

RE: [CI] Update (Crashes!)

I'll take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-9759 - Best regards, Vladimir -Original Message- From: Dmitry Blotsky [mailto:dblot...@microsoft.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2015 5:12 AM To: Subject: [CI] Update

RE: [VOTE] 1.0.0 cordova-serve release

I vote +1 * Verified ability to run browser platform based on cordova-serve * Verified ability to run 'cordova serve' based on cordova-serve - Best regards, Vladimir -Original Message- From: Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) [mailto:v-seg...@microsoft.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 1:04 PM

Cordova-common is merged in

Hey, guys. We've recently pushed the change, that makes cordova-lib depend on cordova-common module [1], which won't be published, but will be bundled into cordova-lib as bundled dependency. There also a PR to coho that support this scenario [2]. Unfortunately this change breaks dev workflow,

RE: Question about ios non-custom frameworks

/ConfigChanges/ConfigKeeper.js#L47 [4] https://github.com/MSOpenTech/cordova-lib/commit/699bfe44a917b264815dc99efa0d770b766fa3a9 - Best regards, Vladimir From: Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) Sent: Friday, October 2, 2015 6:04 PM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: Question about ios non-custom

Question about ios non-custom frameworks

Hi, guys. I'm looking into the tests failures on OS X, caused by PlatformApi refactoring and it seems they caused by double caching of ios pbxproj files: first time in ios_parser [1] and second time in PlatformMunger (through ConfigFile class) [2], [3]. It seems that at some time one file get

RE: [Discuss] Cordova-common release

t; From: Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) [mailto:v-seg...@microsoft.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 1:34 AM > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > > Subject: RE: [Discuss] Cordova-common release > > > > +1 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Vladimi

RE: [Discuss] Cordova-common release

e need to include in our product making our download larger. And yes, yes we bundle all our dependencies when we go into production. - Carlos Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 30, 2015, at 5:27 AM, Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) > <v-vlk...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > Including c

RE: [Discuss] Cordova-common release

Agree with you, guys. Unfortunately, the underlying modules in `cordova-common` are not really atomic, since they depending on each other. For example ConfigParser requires `xmlHelpers`, `events` and `CordovaError` as a dependencies. Reworking them to be truly separated might be sort of

RE: [Vote] Tools Release Sep 17th

: [Vote] Tools Release Sep 17th -1 The tools on npm @rc have Windows line endings and fail to execute on OSX. On 17 September 2015 at 07:08, Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) < v-vlk...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Please review and vote on this Tools Release by replying to this email > (and kee

[Vote] Tools Release Sep 17th (Take 2)

Please review and vote on this Tools Release by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread) Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-9678 Tools have been published to dist/dev: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-9678 The packages were

RE: [DISCUSS] Tools Release

- From: Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) [mailto:v-vlk...@microsoft.com] Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 5:10 PM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Tools Release BTW, could anybody please grant me access to npmjs. I had to ask Sergey to publish packages to NPM. - Best regards, Vladimir

RE: [DISCUSS] Tools Release

I believe this is not a blocker. We have platforms pinned with tilde, so platform's patch release will be picked up automatically. - Best regards, Vladimir -Original Message- From: Tommy Williams [mailto:to...@devgeeks.org] Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 7:59 AM To:

[Vote] Tools Release Sep 17th

Please review and vote on this Tools Release by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread) Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-9678 Tools have been published to dist/dev: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-9678 The packages were

RE: [DISCUSS] Tools Release

> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 5:29 AM Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) < > v-vlk...@microsoft.com> wrote: > >> I believe this is not a blocker. We have platforms pinned with tilde, >> so platform's patch release will be picked up automatically. >> >> - &g

RE: [DISCUSS] Tools Release

] Tools Release OK Vladimir On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 9:50 AM Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) < v-vlk...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Working on it > - > Best regards, Vladimir > > -Original Message- > From: Tommy-Carlos Williams [mailto:to...@devgeeks.org] > Sent: Thursd

RE: Cordova-lib refactoring implementation

. Looks good! > On Sep 1, 2015, at 6:06 AM, Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) > <v-vlk...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > FYI, I'm going to merge this in next 12 hours. > > Best regards, Vladimir. > > -Original Message----- > From: Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) [mail

RE: Cordova-lib refactoring implementation

FYI, I'm going to merge this in next 12 hours. Best regards, Vladimir. -Original Message- From: Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) [mailto:v-vlk...@microsoft.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 6:27 PM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: RE: Cordova-lib refactoring implementation Jesse

RE: [GitHub] cordova-lib pull request: Adds implementation for PlatformApiPoly ...

Sure, Jesse. Best regards, Vladimir. -Original Message- From: Jesse [mailto:purplecabb...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 3:58 AM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: Re: [GitHub] cordova-lib pull request: Adds implementation for PlatformApiPoly ... This looks great, but I

RE: Cordova-lib refactoring implementation

Hey, guys. The PRs has been reviewed by Mark and Sergey. If nobody has any objections, I would like to merge this in tomorrow. Best regards, Vladimir. -Original Message- From: Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) [mailto:v-vlk...@microsoft.com] Sent: Friday, August 21

Cordova-lib refactoring implementation

Hi, guys. I've submitted a PR, that refactors a cordova-lib API and implements a PlatformApi polyfill as discussed in https://github.com/cordova/cordova-discuss/pull/12 Brief overview of this PR:

RE: Cordova-lib refactoring implementation

Oops, previous email sent by mistake ☹ Hi, guys. I’ve submitted a PR, that refactors a cordova-lib API and implements a PlatformApi polyfill (as discussed in https://github.com/cordova/cordova-discuss/pull/12) Please find it here: https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/282. To test this

RE: [Vote] 3.9.0 iOS Release

I vote +1 * Verified archives via `coho verify-archive` * Verified that blank app creates correctly with platform * Verified that blank app can be successfully ran and built * Ran smoke testing of mobilespec app (ran autotests) --- Best regards, Vladimir -Original Message-

RE: Cordova July Hangout

Hey, guys. I've just opened a PR (https://github.com/cordova/cordova-discuss/pull/12) with high level overview of cordova-lib refactoring proposal, so anyone interested may get familiar with it. Feel free to leave your questions and notes, to be able to discuss them during hangout.

RE: [DISCUSS] Remove 'plugman publish' functionality from cordova-lib

, 10 July, 2015 1:52 To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Remove 'plugman publish' functionality from cordova-lib +1, do we want to have shim, for cordova publish that spits a message +about using npm to publish plugins? On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 4:40 AM Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) v-vlk

RE: [DISCUSS] Remove 'plugman publish' functionality from cordova-lib

' functionality from cordova-lib +1! I'm going to start preparing the registry to switch to read only as well. That way users can't use a old version of plugman to publish. On Jul 6, 2015 7:46 AM, Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) v-vlk...@microsoft.com wrote: Hi, list. Wanted to bump 'CPR vs NPM' topic

RE: [DISCUSS] Dropping the -dev suffix

Hey, guys. I've found another reason to drop this while testing cordova-lib with updated dependencies (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-9332) It appears, that starting from 4.x.x semver treats prerelease versions in a very different way. For example:

[DISCUSS] Remove 'plugman publish' functionality from cordova-lib

Hi, list. Wanted to bump 'CPR vs NPM' topic again. July 15 is coming, so probably we'll need to make some changes to remove CPR publishing related functionality from Cordova. Things, that needs to be removed: 1. 'plugman publish/unpublish' commands, 2. 'registry.publish/unpublish' methods

RE: Experimenting with API for cordova tooling

regards, Vladimir -Original Message- From: Vladimir Kotikov (Akvelon) [mailto:v-vlk...@microsoft.com] Sent: Thursday, 4 June, 2015 22:30 To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: RE: Experimenting with API for cordova tooling Hello again :) I wanted to bring your attention to this thread again

RE: [VOTE] Plugins Release June 17th, 2015

I vote +1: * Verified signatures and hashes * Verified tags * Verified that plugins can added correctly to blank app * Verified that blank app can be successfully ran and built * Ran smoke testing of mobilespec app * Verified Release Notes --- Best regards, Vladimir -Original

RE: [VOTE] Cordova Serve 0.1.2 release

I vote +1 * Verified license headers for the cordova-serve * Verified archive from dist for cordova-serve * Installed cordova-serve@rc from npm and verified that it works correctly with corresponding cordova-lib version --- Best regards, Vladimir -Original Message- From:

RE: Latest --browserify status?

Hey, guys. I've tried to run mobilespec today with '--browserify' option, and it seems that it still doesn't work. The application builds and runs, but after running none of tests are working (I'm aware of issues with test-framework, so I've tried to run non-plugin tests), and there is a lot

<    1   2   3   >