[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12980701#action_12980701
]
Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-1002:
--
so far no news since comment.
1.0.2 now has fixes for several serious issues. Unless there's another
known one of sufficient severity I think we should get 1.0.2 as soon
as we can. Can some other folks chime in with their take please?
B.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan
I agree that there are already more than enough serious and not so
serious issues fixed to justify a 1.0.2 release. If we keep waiting
and waiting, there are always issues being reported and discovered
every day/week, therefore always delaying a release.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Robert
unless someone discover another 968 (in terms of seriousness) I think 1.0.2
should be released ASP. Many people are waiting for this release...
On 12.01.2011, at 14:34, Robert Newson wrote:
1.0.2 now has fixes for several serious issues. Unless there's another
known one of sufficient severity
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Robert Newson robert.new...@gmail.com wrote:
1.0.2 now has fixes for several serious issues. Unless there's another
known one of sufficient severity I think we should get 1.0.2 as soon
as we can. Can some other folks chime in with their take please?
B.
I'm
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Sebastian Cohnen
sebastiancoh...@googlemail.com wrote:
unless someone discover another 968 (in terms of seriousness) I think 1.0.2
should be released ASP. Many people are waiting for this release...
I'm waiting for it too. But I want to have time to test it
On 12.01.2011 14:51, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Robert Newsonrobert.new...@gmail.com wrote:
1.0.2 now has fixes for several serious issues. Unless there's another
known one of sufficient severity I think we should get 1.0.2 as soon
as we can. Can some other folks
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Volker Mische volker.mis...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just asking for 1 or 2 days, that's not to much.
I make Volker's words my own.
--
Filipe David Manana,
fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org
Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
Unreasonable men
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Newson resolved COUCHDB-1025.
Resolution: Invalid
The Referer header is required when POST'ing to a document resource
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Volker Mische volker.mis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12.01.2011 14:51, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Robert Newsonrobert.new...@gmail.com
wrote:
1.0.2 now has fixes for several serious issues. Unless there's another
known one of
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess you all have time to test in real condition last patches, I
didn't.
s/have/had
On 12 Jan 2011, at 14:06, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
Vote was stopped yesterday, in any serious businness, we would wait a little.
If Paul works on the release today, you're going to have 4 days to find any
problems with the current code. Should that be long enough? That's twice the 1
or 2 days
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
On 12 Jan 2011, at 14:06, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
Vote was stopped yesterday, in any serious businness, we would wait a little.
If Paul works on the release today, you're going to have 4 days to find any
problems with
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
Well vote is a formal way to test against final package. It take time
to prepare artefact and manage process.
I guess you all have time to test in real condition last patches, I
didn't. I even guess you tested last 2
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
Vote was stopped yesterday, in any serious businness, we would wait a little.
Apache CouchDB is not a business, it's an open source and community project.
Besides that we're talking a about a minor, maintenance release.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Filipe David Manana
fdman...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
Well vote is a formal way to test against final package. It take time
to prepare artefact and manage process.
I guess you all have time
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Filipe David Manana
fdman...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
Vote was stopped yesterday, in any serious businness, we would wait a little.
Apache CouchDB is not a business, it's an open source and
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
Did the multipart API GET issue caused a problem with the current
replicator???
As far as I know, CouchDB doesn't internally use the GET multipart
APIs. The new replicator uses it however, but it's not part of any
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Filipe David Manana
fdman...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
Did the multipart API GET issue caused a problem with the current
replicator???
As far as I know, CouchDB doesn't internally use the GET
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12980751#action_12980751
]
Malte S. Stretz commented on COUCHDB-1025:
--
Doh. Sorry for the noise, next time
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Filipe David Manana
fdman...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
Did the multipart API GET issue caused a problem with the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12980815#action_12980815
]
Adam Kocoloski commented on COUCHDB-1010:
-
I'd like to take one last look first,
On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Robert Newson robert.new...@gmail.com
wrote:
1.0.2 now has fixes for several serious issues. Unless there's another
known one of sufficient severity I think we should get 1.0.2 as soon
as we can. Can some
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Robert Newson robert.new...@gmail.com
wrote:
1.0.2 now has fixes for several serious issues. Unless there's another
known one of
Paul,
I think a new release candidate from the tip of 1.0.x
(3674f2a2ef778bdf211426d9e804192e22cd26ad in github ensure
write_streamed_attachment bails on negative LenLeft values
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Benoit
+1 trillion.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Robert Newson robert.new...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Robert Newson robert.new...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 trillion.
Does that mean the motion passes? I could see nay-votes having a hard
time coming back from down 1 trillion.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12980830#action_12980830
]
Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-1010:
--
np, let me know
improve
On 12 Jan 2011, at 17:45, Paul Davis wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Robert Newson robert.new...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 trillion.
Does that mean the motion passes? I could see nay-votes having a hard
time coming back from down 1 trillion.
Sorry to inform you, Paul...
But that the
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
On 12 Jan 2011, at 17:45, Paul Davis wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Robert Newson robert.new...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 trillion.
Does that mean the motion passes? I could see nay-votes having a hard
time
On 12 Jan 2011, at 18:00, Paul Davis wrote:
What is this now? The US Senate? I thought we were better than that.
I'll filibuster us into November if you're not careful, Mister.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Filipe David Manana
fdman...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
Vote was stopped yesterday, in any serious businness, we would wait a little.
Apache CouchDB is not a business, it's an open source and
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:38, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
On 12 Jan 2011, at 18:00, Paul Davis wrote:
What is this now? The US Senate? I thought we were better than that.
I'll filibuster us into November if you're not careful, Mister.
Noah for president.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12980944#action_12980944
]
Timothy Smith commented on COUCHDB-360:
---
I agree with Benoit; I have a use case that
Database names are not encoded in the rewriter
--
Key: COUCHDB-1026
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1026
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Bug
Components: HTTP Interface
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benjamin Young updated COUCHDB-1026:
Attachment: encode_db_name_in_rewriter.patch
Database names are not encoded in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benjamin Young updated COUCHDB-973:
---
Attachment: 410.patch
Return 410 when GETing a previously deleted document (rather than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12981062#action_12981062
]
Robert Newson commented on COUCHDB-973:
---
I'll re-read the relevant parts of RFC 2616
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12981068#action_12981068
]
Paul Joseph Davis commented on COUCHDB-973:
---
I almost went to say +1 but after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12981090#action_12981090
]
Randall Leeds commented on COUCHDB-973:
---
Since the document may be recreated at any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12981159#action_12981159
]
Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-973:
-
indeed. That's something I've
41 matches
Mail list logo
