Randall, I have to disagree on this one.
The reason to not call couch_db:get_design_docs/1 is to avoid reading
the body of the documents, which is not needed.
Plus, couch_db:get_design_docs/1 skips deleted documents, which will
causes _changes rows to be skipped.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:07
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Filipe David Manana
fdman...@apache.org wrote:
Randall, I have to disagree on this one.
The reason to not call couch_db:get_design_docs/1 is to avoid reading
the body of the documents, which is not needed.
Plus, couch_db:get_design_docs/1 skips deleted
Randall,
Did we miss the chance to review this work before it landed?
B.
On 9 November 2011 10:36, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Filipe David Manana
fdman...@apache.org wrote:
Randall, I have to disagree on this one.
The reason to not call
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 02:48, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
Randall,
Did we miss the chance to review this work before it landed?
Yes. Sorry. I thought it was more trivial than it was. I owe it to
Filipe for catching the mistake.
While I changed get_design_docs not to get the body by
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:00, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 02:48, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
Randall,
Did we miss the chance to review this work before it landed?
Yes. Sorry. I thought it was more trivial than it was. I owe it to
Filipe
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 02:48, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
Randall,
Did we miss the chance to review this work before it landed?
Yes. Sorry. I thought it was more trivial than it was. I owe it to
Filipe