we should revisit our minimum required Erlang version.
Do we have a compelling reason for supporting anything below
R13B04? That release introduces support for recursive type
specifications, which are useful when describing revision trees and
JSON objects to dialyzer.
Regards, Adam
+1
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Filipe David Manana
fdman...@apache.org wrote:
I'm not sure if bumping to R13B04 is appropriate, since many Linux
distributions (Ubuntu for e.g.) ship with older R13 releases.
Therefore I would bump to R13B.
R13B01 seem the one used on some distri actually yes
should revisit our minimum required Erlang version.
Do we have a compelling reason for supporting anything below
R13B04? That release introduces support for recursive type
specifications, which are useful when describing revision trees
and JSON objects to dialyzer.
Regards, Adam
+1
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Filipe David Manana
fdman...@apache.org wrote:
I'm not sure if bumping to R13B04 is appropriate, since many Linux
distributions (Ubuntu for e.g.) ship with older R13 releases.
Therefore
I think it would be worth to probe the users' mailing list about this as well.
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Filipe David Manana
Hi, the mochiweb we're shipping in 1.1.0 has abandoned support for R12B05, so
we should revisit our minimum required Erlang version. Do we have a compelling
reason for supporting anything below R13B04? That release introduces support
for recursive type specifications, which are useful when
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi, the mochiweb we're shipping in 1.1.0 has abandoned support for R12B05, so
we should revisit our minimum required Erlang version. Do we have a
compelling reason for supporting anything below R13B04? That release
On Dec 7, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi, the mochiweb we're shipping in 1.1.0 has abandoned support for R12B05,
so we should revisit our minimum required Erlang version. Do we have a
compelling reason
our minimum required Erlang version. Do we have a
compelling reason for supporting anything below R13B04? That release
introduces support for recursive type specifications, which are useful when
describing revision trees and JSON objects to dialyzer.
Regards, Adam
+1 for R13something
we're shipping in 1.1.0 has abandoned support for R12B05,
so we should revisit our minimum required Erlang version. Do we have a
compelling reason for supporting anything below R13B04? That release
introduces support for recursive type specifications, which are useful
when describing revision
:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi, the mochiweb we're shipping in 1.1.0 has abandoned support for
R12B05, so we should revisit our minimum required Erlang version. Do we
have a compelling reason for supporting anything below R13B04? That
release
Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi, the mochiweb we're shipping in 1.1.0 has abandoned support for
R12B05, so we should revisit our minimum required Erlang version. Do we
have a compelling reason for supporting anything below R13B04? That
release introduces support for recursive type
required Erlang version. Do
we have a compelling reason for supporting anything below R13B04? That
release introduces support for recursive type specifications, which are
useful when describing revision trees and JSON objects to dialyzer.
Regards, Adam
+1 for R13something.
Paul
Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi, the mochiweb we're shipping in 1.1.0 has abandoned support for
R12B05, so we should revisit our minimum required Erlang version. Do
we have a compelling reason for supporting anything below R13B04?
That release introduces support for recursive type
7, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi, the mochiweb we're shipping in 1.1.0 has abandoned support for
R12B05, so we should revisit our minimum required Erlang version. Do
we have a compelling reason
should revisit our minimum required Erlang version.
Do we have a compelling reason for supporting anything below R13B04?
That release introduces support for recursive type specifications,
which are useful when describing revision trees and JSON objects to
dialyzer.
Regards, Adam
+1
16 matches
Mail list logo
