Hi Nicholas,
This looks very interesting. My apologies for not looking into this in more
detail (it's CouchDB Conf week). I'll definitely have a closer look soon.
Cheers
Jan
--
On 22.01.2013, at 16:18, nicholas a. evans n...@ekenosen.net wrote:
I've started hacking on an implementation of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Newson reassigned COUCHDB-1305:
--
Assignee: Randall Leeds (was: Robert Newson)
+1
keep db crashes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joan Touzet reassigned COUCHDB-523:
---
Assignee: Joan Touzet (was: Robert Newson)
View API POST keys to retrieve multiple
Robert Newson created COUCHDB-1654:
--
Summary: couchdb view sig changed
Key: COUCHDB-1654
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1654
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Newson updated COUCHDB-1654:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.3
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
couchdb view sig changed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Newson updated COUCHDB-1654:
---
Description:
view sigs and location changed between 1.2.x and 1.3.x, which would cause
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13563783#comment-13563783
]
Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-1654:
--
Just read the code and it seems
Awesome!
Prediction (can't wait to be proven wrong):
* Very little difference in different implementations (because stdio is the
bottleneck)
* Native views are faster but not *way* faster
Wrinkles:
* I vaguely recall JS being about equal speed to Erlang (native) when
benchmarking
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Jason Smith j...@iriscouch.com wrote:
* Very little difference in different implementations (because stdio is the
bottleneck)
Why stdio is a bottleneck? I'm interesting underlay reasons.
As for my experience, the protocol design doesn't allows view and
query
On Jan 27, 2013, at 13:22 , Alexander Shorin kxe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Jason Smith j...@iriscouch.com wrote:
* Very little difference in different implementations (because stdio is the
bottleneck)
Why stdio is a bottleneck? I'm interesting underlay reasons.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Jason Smith j...@iriscouch.com wrote:
Hi, David. Yes, you make very good points. I even think you (and Benoit)
may be ultimately correct
I dispute that Node.js is V8. Node is not V8. Node.js is a direct link to
God. When I pray to God in the JavaScript
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
On Jan 27, 2013, at 13:22 , Alexander Shorin kxe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Jason Smith j...@iriscouch.com wrote:
* Very little difference in different implementations (because stdio is
the
Science!
On Sunday, 27 January 2013 at 18:42, Russell Branca wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
On Jan 27, 2013, at 13:22 , Alexander Shorin kxe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Jason Smith j...@iriscouch.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
On Jan 27, 2013, at 13:22 , Alexander Shorin kxe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Jason Smith j...@iriscouch.com wrote:
* Very little difference in different implementations (because stdio is
the
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
On Jan 27, 2013, at 13:22 , Alexander Shorin kxe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Jason Smith j...@iriscouch.com wrote:
* Very little difference in different implementations (because stdio is the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13563897#comment-13563897
]
Russell Branca commented on COUCHDB-1653:
-
+1 this fixed 1.2.x for me, thanks
On 26 January 2013 22:38, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Benoit Chesneau bchesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Jason Smith j...@iriscouch.com wrote:
This is a great thread I'm wholly in favour of pretty much all of it.
As
Pierre Voisin created COUCHDB-1655:
--
Summary: CentOS + CouchDB 1.2.1 - Adding documents to _users fails
with a OS Process Error error
Key: COUCHDB-1655
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1655
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pierre Voisin updated COUCHDB-1655:
---
Attachment: trace.txt
Complete log trace relating to my PUT request.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13563993#comment-13563993
]
Pierre Voisin commented on COUCHDB-1655:
Note: /_users/_design/_auth does exist
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13564045#comment-13564045
]
Joan Touzet commented on COUCHDB-1655:
--
Your SpiderMonkey installation is probably
Hey, Jan. This is a totally random and hypothetical idea:
Do you think there would be any speedup to use term_to_binary() and
binary_to_term() instead of encoding through JSON? The view server would of
course need to support that codec. I have already implemented encoding in
erlang.js:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Jason Smith j...@iriscouch.com wrote:
Hey, Jan. This is a totally random and hypothetical idea:
Do you think there would be any speedup to use term_to_binary() and
binary_to_term() instead of encoding through JSON? The view server would of
course need to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13564088#comment-13564088
]
Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-1654:
--
I don't see any reason to change
I tried this a long time ago with the binary to JS code in C. It didn't make
for a huge improvement in total speed.
On Jan 27, 2013, at 11:37 PM, Jason Smith j...@iriscouch.com wrote:
Hey, Jan. This is a totally random and hypothetical idea:
Do you think there would be any speedup to use
25 matches
Mail list logo
