Re: Proposed deprecations / removals (was: Re: Getting started on CouchDB 3.0, and an introduction)

2019-10-02 Thread Joan Touzet
On 2019-10-02 15:10, Denitsa Burroughs wrote: > Hi Joan, Adam, et al, > > Ilya and I got together to review the deprecations list to a) determine if > there were any additional breaking changes required for 3.0 and b) ensure > we had a comprehensive list for documentation and release notes

Re: Proposed deprecations / removals (was: Re: Getting started on CouchDB 3.0, and an introduction)

2019-10-02 Thread Denitsa Burroughs
Hi Joan, Adam, et al, Ilya and I got together to review the deprecations list to a) determine if there were any additional breaking changes required for 3.0 and b) ensure we had a comprehensive list for documentation and release notes purposes. We used this email thread and the tickets Adam

Re: Proposed deprecations / removals (was: Re: Getting started on CouchDB 3.0, and an introduction)

2019-09-16 Thread Adam Kocoloski
I added https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/2191 to the 3.0 release tasks but I don’t know exactly what the desired end state looks like there. Adam > On Sep 14, 2019, at 3:11 PM, Joan Touzet wrote: > > Hi Deni, I think you mean Joan, not Jan. :D > > As I mentioned there isn't an issue

Re: Proposed deprecations / removals (was: Re: Getting started on CouchDB 3.0, and an introduction)

2019-09-14 Thread Joan Touzet
Hi Deni, I think you mean Joan, not Jan. :D As I mentioned there isn't an issue yet, so we need to create one. I'm away from my credentials until Tuesday and can address this then, if no one gets to it first. -Joan On 2019-09-11 2:43 p.m., Denitsa Burroughs wrote: Hi Jan - Do you happen to

Re: Proposed deprecations / removals (was: Re: Getting started on CouchDB 3.0, and an introduction)

2019-09-11 Thread Denitsa Burroughs
Hi Jan - Do you happen to have the ticket/link for this? > I remembered one last deprecation we wanted in 3.0: security tightening, > which included the deprecation of admin party. > Thanks! Deni On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 2:14 PM Joan Touzet wrote: > I remembered one last deprecation we wanted

Re: Proposed deprecations / removals (was: Re: Getting started on CouchDB 3.0, and an introduction)

2019-09-05 Thread Adam Kocoloski
Tsk, we contributed all of that code without any corresponding documentation? Thanks for pointing that out Will, I’ve added it to the list. Adam > On Sep 5, 2019, at 5:10 AM, Will Holley wrote: > > From an operational pov, the compaction daemon was removed in favour of > smoosh [1]. We owe

Re: Proposed deprecations / removals (was: Re: Getting started on CouchDB 3.0, and an introduction)

2019-09-05 Thread Will Holley
>From an operational pov, the compaction daemon was removed in favour of smoosh [1]. We owe some documentation around these new subsystems (smoosh, ioq, ken) and some guides covering common cases (only compact during quiet periods, disable compaction, etc) to aid migration. [1]

Re: Proposed deprecations / removals (was: Re: Getting started on CouchDB 3.0, and an introduction)

2019-09-04 Thread Joan Touzet
On 2019-09-04 20:53, Adam Kocoloski wrote: > Great list, Joan, thanks. I created a handful of GitHub issues for the first > two sections and tossed them in the “Proposed for 3.x” column. I also > submitted a PR to address one of them :) Cheers! I've also retitled that column "3.0 Release

Re: Proposed deprecations / removals (was: Re: Getting started on CouchDB 3.0, and an introduction)

2019-09-04 Thread Adam Kocoloski
Great list, Joan, thanks. I created a handful of GitHub issues for the first two sections and tossed them in the “Proposed for 3.x” column. I also submitted a PR to address one of them :) Out of that list of already-deprecated functionality the only one that gives me pause is the

Re: Proposed deprecations / removals (was: Re: Getting started on CouchDB 3.0, and an introduction)

2019-09-04 Thread Johs Ensby
Much appreciated, Joan You're a hero Johs > On 4 Sep 2019, at 23:37, Joan Touzet wrote: > > Hey Adam, > >> When it comes to deprecating and/or removing functionality, I feel like I >> don’t know exactly where we stand today. We have occasionally described some >> of the CouchApp