Re: Release Next Steps, was Re: [VOTE] Crail v1.0-rc2 source release

Ok, thanks. Let's skip maven central for now. I will call for an IPMC vote then. Jonas On Mon, 7 May 2018 07:33:14 -0700 Julian Hyde wrote: Yes, if you want binary artifacts to be available from maven central, you need to stage the artifacts in nexus. They are

Re: Release Next Steps, was Re: [VOTE] Crail v1.0-rc2 source release

Luciano, Julian, Is the idea that we put the artifacts into a staging directory (for maven central?) prior to starting the IPMC vote? If not required, can we make the call the IPMC vote? Source release is prepared, PPMC vote has passed, so from our side everything is ready. Thanks, Patrick

Re: Release Next Steps, was Re: [VOTE] Crail v1.0-rc2 source release

I looked at the example of Toree. How can I stage artifacts at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories ? I assume this is for maven central? Thanks, Jonas On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:03:49 -0700 Luciano Resende wrote: For the IPMC vote, it's very similar to this

Release Next Steps, was Re: [VOTE] Crail v1.0-rc2 source release

For the IPMC vote, it's very similar to this one, but you would add the link to this thread and another link to the result. You can see some examples at: https://lists.apache.org/list.html?gene...@incubator.apache.org Also, you should have your result e-mail with a subject [RESULT]. Thanks --

Re: [VOTE] Crail v1.0-rc2 source release

I'm closing the PPMC vote now: 5 + votes 0 - votes @Julian, Luciano How do we kick of the IPMC vote? Thanks Jonas On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:19:03 +0200 "Jonas Pfefferle" wrote: Thanks for the clarification. Let's wait until tomorrow to close the voting for the PPMC.

Re: [VOTE] Crail v1.0-rc2 source release

Thanks for the clarification. Let's wait until tomorrow to close the voting for the PPMC. Jonas On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 07:57:44 -0700 Julian Hyde wrote: The “binding” thing is a bit confusing. Let me attempt to clarify. The first vote is in the PPMC (podling PMC) and

Re: [VOTE] Crail v1.0-rc2 source release

The “binding” thing is a bit confusing. Let me attempt to clarify. The first vote is in the PPMC (podling PMC) and members of the PPMC have binding votes. That’s mentors plus initial committers - i.e. most folks on this list. The second vote is by the incubator PMC. It starts only when the

Re: [VOTE] Crail v1.0-rc2 source release

+1 (non-binding) Jonas, Many thanks for driving this release forward. Let's cross fingers we get all the binding votes needed ;) Luciano, Raphael - did you by any chance found the time to have Crail RC2 evaluated..? Thanks very much for your support! Cheers, Bernard. On 4/26/2018 9:47, Jonas

Re: [VOTE] Crail v1.0-rc2 source release

Hi Julian, Thanks for the vote. I will link the key into the web of trust thing and I just fixed the KEYS file (The "HOWTO" part is a shameless copy of gearpump's KEYS file). So current vote status is: + 1 Binding vote by Julian Hyde - 0 (+ 3 not binding) Since we need another PMC meber to

Re: [VOTE] Crail v1.0-rc2 source release

s fine to release rc2. > > Cheers > Adrian > > > > > From: "Jonas Pfefferle" <peppe...@japf.ch> > To: "dev@crail.apache.org" <dev@crail.apache.org> > Date: 04/23/2018 01:40 PM > Subject:[VOTE] Crail v1.0-rc2 source releas

Re: [VOTE] Crail v1.0-rc2 source release

+1 Thanks for fixing everything commented on rc1. It looks like everything is fine to release rc2. Cheers Adrian From: "Jonas Pfefferle" <peppe...@japf.ch> To: "dev@crail.apache.org" <dev@crail.apache.org> Date: 04/23/2018 01:40 PM Subject:

[VOTE] Crail v1.0-rc2 source release

Hi all, I fixed all the comments from rc1 and created rc2: * Add all three source download options in README (@Julian requirements were already there) * Fix NOTICE file to include actual year for Apache Software Foundation * Fix signatures * Created KEYS file