+1 on waiting for the new distribution platform (and continuing to search for a
primary Release Manager).
On 3/8/23, 06:29, "Finan, Sean" wrote:
External Email
Hi all Apache cTAKES developers and users,
I have news on the release front ...
The Apache Infrastructure team is working on a new
I would be in favor of using GitHub issues but only if that means we migrate
all the Jira issues there and close down Jira. Having two different issue
trackers sound like a recipe for things getting lost.
Steve
On 1/2/23, 12:02, "gandhi rajan" wrote:
External Email
Hi Sean,
Most of the
Sean, aren't you subscribed to
notificati...@ctakes.apache.org? I've been getting failed test messages
from the official cTakes build for weeks now. You've even been CC'd on some
of them. Maybe check your junk mail? I haven't said anything about these
emails because 1) I assumed everyone else was
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:04 AM Finan, Sean <
sean.fi...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
> There is some suboptimal looping in AssertioncCleartkAnalysisEngine. For
> instance:
> Collection entities =
> JCasUtil.select(identifiedAnnotationView, IdentifiedAnnotation.class);
> for
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Kim Ebert
kim.eb...@perfectsearchcorp.com wrote:
I've done some investigation into using / working with the git repo for
cTAKES, and I found that it is a huge. It doesn't work well with GitHub
either, as I keep running into timeouts.
I would like to make the
From: Steven Bethard [steven.beth...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 10:59 AM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: types for hybrid relations
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:36 AM, Miller, Timothy
timothy.mil...@childrens.harvard.edu wrote:
Any votes for one or more of the following
that at least one contributor (not
me) prefers to use git.
Sean
-Original Message-
From: Steven Bethard [mailto:steven.beth...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 3:38 PM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: git mirrors out of sync?
The git mirrors for cTAKES seem
The git mirrors for cTAKES seem to be either broken
(http://git.apache.org/ctakes.git) or embarrassingly out of sync
(https://github.com/apache/ctakes). Is this a known issue? I looked at
the INFRA ticket [1], but didn't see anything that suggested that
there should be a problem.
Steve
[1]
It seems that YTEX depends on trove4j which is LGPL [1], but
LGPL-licensed works must not be included in Apache products [2].
Have the YTEX dependencies been reviewed for licensing issues? (I only
stumbled upon the trove issue via a version conflict in other code.)
Steve
[1]
this may have been missed.
I noticed it's in the convenience binary distro as well. We need to remove
this; I'll create a Jira.
VJ, could you confirm- I actually don't think we use trove4j in ytex?
ctakes-ytex/pom.xml
--Pei
-Original Message-
From: Steven Bethard
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Bruce Tietjen
bruce.tiet...@perfectsearchcorp.com wrote:
Since I started working with cTakes some time ago, I have found it
difficult to compare the output between subsequent runs on the same files
because annotations are often assigned different IDs, are listed
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Miller, Timothy
timothy.mil...@childrens.harvard.edu wrote:
PE: Lymphnodes: neck and axilla without adenopathy Lungs: normal and clear to
auscultation CV: regular rate and rhythm without murmur or gallop , S1, S2
normal, no murmur, click, rub or gal*, chest is
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Chen, Pei
pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu wrote:
Is there an easy way to get the confidence from the classifiers from clearTK?
Example-
BIOChunkingBaseToken, TimeMention.createChunks(timexCas, tokens, outcomes);
If you're in a CleartkAnnotator, you can use
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Pei Chen chen...@apache.org wrote:
Steve and Co.,
Do you know if the ClearTK 2.0 upgrade will require retraining of all of
the models?
Very likely, as the changes in package names mean that old classifiers
will probably not deserialize. Yet another reason we
I don't think not something anyone would want extracted should be an
argument against anything. We already have constituent and dependency
parse trees in the type system, and those would fall under that
category.
So +1 on markables in the type system. (In general, +1 on moving
module-specific
+1. And note that once you have a descriptor, you can generate the
XML, so we should arrange to replace the current XML descriptors with
ones generated automatically from the uimaFIT code. That should reduce
some synchronization problems when the Java code was changed but the
XML descriptor was
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:24 AM, andy mcmurry mcmurry.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Clojure, having its origins in LISP, is a better fit for serious NLP work
than Groovy
Sorry, I have to call this one out. I don't think having origins in
LISP makes anything a better fit for serious NLP work. Not that
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Masanz, James J.
masanz.ja...@mayo.edu wrote:
The bigger issue is the following
I was getting an error about scala, so I added the following to the Grapes
annotation in my groovy script
@Grab(group='org.scala-lang', module='scala-library', version='2.9.0'),
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Dmitriy Dligach
dmitriy.dlig...@childrens.harvard.edu wrote:
My personal opinion is we should *not* include it. It's not quite ready for
ctakes end users just yet.
Yeah, there aren't any models included in it at the moment, so it's
not very useful.
Steve
they need to differentiate the null vs
explicit negated case, they can still iterate though the
BinaryTextRelations because we didn't lose the data.
--Pei
From: Steven Bethard [steven.beth...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 2:12 PM
To: dev
times in eclipse.
I don¹t think it's a general problem because I have other environments
doing just fine, and Jenkins is not showing problems.
Thanks!
stephen
On 7/30/13 6:38 PM, Steven Bethard steven.beth...@colorado.edu wrote:
On 30 Jul2013, at 7:32 , Wu, Stephen T., Ph.D. wu.step
no longer support
building such malformed projects.
On 7/31/13 8:50 AM, Steven Bethard steven.beth...@colorado.edu wrote:
On 31 Jul2013, at 7:12 , Wu, Stephen T., Ph.D. wu.step...@mayo.edu
wrote:
Steve, warnings from mvn compile are attached. Afterwards, mvn compile
finished
[WARNING]
[WARNING] It is highly recommended to fix these problems because they
threaten the stability of your build.
[WARNING]
[WARNING] For this reason, future Maven versions might no longer support
building such malformed projects.
On 7/31/13 8:50 AM, Steven Bethard
On 30 Jul2013, at 7:32 , Wu, Stephen T., Ph.D. wu.step...@mayo.edu wrote:
Is anyone else getting errors importing from cleartk? In one of my
environments, the following projects:
ctakes-assertion
ctakes-relation-extractor
ctakes-temporal
are complaining about not finding these classes
Here's that error again:
On 22 Jul2013, at 12:05 , Apache Jenkins Server jenk...@builds.apache.org
wrote:
[ERROR] 'dependencies.dependency.version' for net.sf.mastif:mastif-zoner:jar
is missing. @ line 36, column 15
Could whoever is taking care of ctakes-assertion-zoner fix this? We haven't
Perhaps everyone is already aware of this, but just in case, I'm seeing build
failures and have been for a while now:
$ mvn clean compile
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[ERROR] The build could not read 1 project - [Help 1]
[ERROR]
[ERROR] The project
-Masanz.James=mayo@ctakes.apache.org
[mailto:dev-return-1704-Masanz.James=mayo@ctakes.apache.org] On Behalf Of
Steven Bethard
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 10:35 AM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: Next cTAKES release (3.1)?
On 26 Jun2013, at 8:35 , Masanz, James J. masanz.ja
-return-1652-Masanz.James=mayo@ctakes.apache.org] On Behalf
Of Steven Bethard
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 2:18 PM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: Next cTAKES release (3.1)?
As a result of the CTAKES-190 changes to the dictionary lookup [1], the
relation extractor needs some
that sound about like what we want, right?
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Steven Bethard [mailto:steven.beth...@colorado.edu]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 2:46 AM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: Aren't the *-res dependencies backwards?
On May 8, 2013, at 9:03 PM
-Masanz.James=mayo@ctakes.apache.org] On Behalf Of
Steven Bethard
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 5:45 PM
To: ctakes-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: upgrade ClearTK dependency to 1.4.0?
I just released ClearTK 1.4.0 and there are a couple of reasons we should
probably consider updating
On Apr 11, 2013, at 8:05 AM, Masanz, James J. masanz.ja...@mayo.edu wrote:
And ctakes-drug-ner-res is listed within the Maven Dependencies for
ctakes-drug-ner
Shouldn't it be exactly the opposite of this? Shouldn't ctakes-drug-ner-res
depend on ctakes-drug-ner? Otherwise, Maven's always
31 matches
Mail list logo
