RE: Aegis versus jaxrs

2008-10-14 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi, Same with the JAX-RS JAXB (and JAXB based JSON) provider - contexts are cached and can be reused. If ObjectFactory is available then only a single context will be created. At the moment, either a class name or just a package name can serve as a key in the (two) maps of contexts. May be for

Re: Memory leak in CXF HTTP transport in Solaris ?

2008-10-14 Thread Daniel Kulp
I'm honestly no seeing this on my linux box with the latest code. I hit it with about 500K requests to warm up the JIT and stuff, check the heap sizes using jconsole (1.6VM), then hit it with another 1.5 million requests and rechecked the heap sizes and they ended up exactly the same.

Re: JMS 1.0.2 support......

2008-10-14 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Saturday 11 October 2008 3:34:52 am Christian Schneider wrote: Hi Dan, sounds reasonable to me. I have added the config element to address and set the default. I think setting useJms11 to false for 2.0.x and 2.1.x probably makes sense for compatibility sake. For 2.2 (trunk), it probably

Re: Memory leak in CXF HTTP transport in Solaris ?

2008-10-14 Thread anoopPrasad
Adding the Link again from the last post: Could you please have a look at the following post and tell me whether it applies to CXF. http://blogs.sun.com/fkieviet/entry/classloader_leaks_the_dreaded_java ~ anoopPrasad anoopPrasad wrote: Dear Dan/Bharat, I have checked Heap,non-Heap, and

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.9

2008-10-14 Thread Christian Schneider
Hi Willem, so that´s fine with me. I think we should start a release note wiki page for 2.0.9 and perhaps also for 2.1.3. Btw. I noticed that there is no release notes page for the latest 2.1.2 release. In apache camel they create the release notes quite early and then collect the

Re: Aegis versus jaxrs

2008-10-14 Thread Benson Margulies
I haven't been able to come up with a reason why Aegis would ever say no to isWriteable or isReadable, but I'll study some more. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Sergey Beryozkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Sounds good. Have a look, say, at BinaryProvider unit test or at one of the atom