Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.9/2.4.6/2.5.2

2012-01-20 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
+1. Colm. On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: We've resolved over 45 issues since 2.5.1.  Most importantly, several of them were regressions since 2.5.0 and thus we need to get a new release out.  We've also ported back over 25 of the fixes to 2.4.6 and 8

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.9/2.4.6/2.5.2

2012-01-20 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
+1 Cheers, Sergey On 20/01/12 00:08, Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 45 issues since 2.5.1. Most importantly, several of them were regressions since 2.5.0 and thus we need to get a new release out. We've also ported back over 25 of the fixes to 2.4.6 and 8 of those to 2.3.9. List

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.9/2.4.6/2.5.2

2012-01-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (non binding) Tested in Karaf 2.2.5. Regards JB On 01/20/2012 01:08 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 45 issues since 2.5.1. Most importantly, several of them were regressions since 2.5.0 and thus we need to get a new release out. We've also ported back over 25 of the fixes to

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.9/2.4.6/2.5.2

2012-01-20 Thread David Bosschaert
+1 David. On 20 January 2012 00:08, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: We've resolved over 45 issues since 2.5.1.  Most importantly, several of them were regressions since 2.5.0 and thus we need to get a new release out.  We've also ported back over 25 of the fixes to 2.4.6 and 8 of those

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.9/2.4.6/2.5.2

2012-01-20 Thread Christian Schneider
+1 Christian Am 20.01.2012 01:08, schrieb Daniel Kulp: We've resolved over 45 issues since 2.5.1. Most importantly, several of them were regressions since 2.5.0 and thus we need to get a new release out. We've also ported back over 25 of the fixes to 2.4.6 and 8 of those to 2.3.9. List of

Using custom CryptoProvider in Wss4jInInterceptor (patch)

2012-01-20 Thread Andrei Shakirin
Hi, Just a proposal for small improvements in Wss4jInInterceptor. Normally CryptoProvider doesn't instantiated directly via CryptoFactory, but firstly tried to be obtained from message context properties (SecurityConstants.ENCRYPT_CRYPTO, SecurityConstants.SIGNATURE_CRYPTO). And only if the

Prob uploading file with pics

2012-01-20 Thread lolo13100
Hi ! I've a strange problem with the uploading file with pics. When I uplaod a simple RTF file the content of the file is ok. But when I insert the same file with a simple pics inside the content of the file is empty. Please find my interface : @POST @Consumes(multipart/form-data) public

DOSGi export service

2012-01-20 Thread Jesus
Hello, I'm develop a bundle to export a service, and I'm using DOSGi (multi-bundle distribution) and Apache-Felix. I install my bundle and, when DOSGi detects, ApacheFelix lunch these exceptions: g! ERROR: Bundle cxf-dosgi-ri-discovery-local [46] EventDispatcher: Error during dispatch.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.9/2.4.6/2.5.2

2012-01-20 Thread Aki Yoshida
+1 Aki 2012/1/20 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org: We've resolved over 45 issues since 2.5.1.  Most importantly, several of them were regressions since 2.5.0 and thus we need to get a new release out.  We've also ported back over 25 of the fixes to 2.4.6 and 8 of those to 2.3.9. List of

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.9/2.4.6/2.5.2

2012-01-20 Thread Christian Schneider
Alexey Markevich found a critical bug that prevents CXF from working in OSGi. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4050 I forgot to change the Activator name in the poms when backporting a refactoring. Committed the fix. I think we should redo the release. So reverting to -1 Sorry

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.9/2.4.6/2.5.2

2012-01-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Christian, I didn't see it when testing with JAX-RS endpoint. Let me try again to be sure. Regards JB On 01/20/2012 03:02 PM, Christian Schneider wrote: Alexey Markevich found a critical bug that prevents CXF from working in OSGi. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4050 I forgot to

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.9/2.4.6/2.5.2

2012-01-20 Thread Aki Yoshida
Hi Christian, you are right. I had some automatic tests that didn't report this problem (or was not pulling 2.5.2 correctly, maybe) :-( I saw the problem now after manually trying some scenarios. regards, aki 2012/1/20 Christian Schneider ch...@die-schneider.net: Alexey Markevich found a

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.9/2.4.6/2.5.2

2012-01-20 Thread Daniel Kulp
I'm canceling this vote due to the OSGi issues that have been discovered. With the fix in, I'm starting the rebuild process now. Dan On Thursday, January 19, 2012 7:08:44 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 45 issues since 2.5.1. Most importantly, several of them were regressions

Re: Discuss: Move common-utilities to api

2012-01-20 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Thursday, January 19, 2012 2:43:39 PM Christian Schneider wrote: Hi all, I propose we move the common-utilities project to the cxf api. The API depends on this project and basically all other prohects in cxf depend on the API. So I think it makes no real sense to split these into two

[VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.9/2.4.6/2.5.2 - take 2

2012-01-20 Thread Daniel Kulp
We've resolved over 45 issues since 2.5.1. Most importantly, several of them were regressions since 2.5.0 and thus we need to get a new release out. We've also ported back over 25 of the fixes to 2.4.6 and 8 of those to 2.3.9. This is the second attempt at this release which fixes the issues

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.9/2.4.6/2.5.2 - take 2

2012-01-20 Thread Jeff Genender
+1 Jeff On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 45 issues since 2.5.1. Most importantly, several of them were regressions since 2.5.0 and thus we need to get a new release out. We've also ported back over 25 of the fixes to 2.4.6 and 8 of those to 2.3.9.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.9/2.4.6/2.5.2 - take 2

2012-01-20 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
+1. Colm. On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Jeff Genender jgenen...@apache.org wrote: +1 Jeff On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 45 issues since 2.5.1.  Most importantly, several of them were regressions since 2.5.0 and thus we need to get a new release

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.9/2.4.6/2.5.2 - take 2

2012-01-20 Thread Alessio Soldano
+1 Cheers Alessio On 01/20/2012 06:56 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 45 issues since 2.5.1. Most importantly, several of them were regressions since 2.5.0 and thus we need to get a new release out. We've also ported back over 25 of the fixes to 2.4.6 and 8 of those to

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.9/2.4.6/2.5.2 - take 2

2012-01-20 Thread Aki Yoshida
+1 Aki 2012/1/20 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org: We've resolved over 45 issues since 2.5.1.  Most importantly, several of them were regressions since 2.5.0 and thus we need to get a new release out.  We've also ported back over 25 of the fixes to 2.4.6 and 8 of those to 2.3.9. This is the

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.9/2.4.6/2.5.2 - take 2

2012-01-20 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
+1 Sergey On 20/01/12 17:56, Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 45 issues since 2.5.1. Most importantly, several of them were regressions since 2.5.0 and thus we need to get a new release out. We've also ported back over 25 of the fixes to 2.4.6 and 8 of those to 2.3.9. This is the