ProjectStages in EAR scenarios

2013-06-03 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi folks! The ProjectStageProducer currently uses a static field, thus we only have 1 ProjectStage per EAR if DeltaSpike gets shipped in the EARs /lib folder (opposed to each WAR). I personally don't think this is a problem - au contráire, I think it makes sense to have all WARs using the

Re: ProjectStages in EAR scenarios

2013-06-03 Thread Gerhard Petracek
+1 regards, gerhard 2013/6/3 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com +1, ear = 1 app so having 2 project stages would lead to stupid issues IMO *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features

2013-06-03 Thread titou10 titou10
For us DS v0.5 should be focused on the JSF module and particularly on porting CODI scopes top get rid of CODI asap. ie: - port the CODI Conversation and related scopes to DS (Group etc.) - Enhance the WindowScope. (at least https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-374 ) - port the

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features

2013-06-03 Thread Karl Kildén
1+ For JSF stuff The bridge between JSF ExceptionHandler and DS Exception Handling feels like pretty low hanging fruit? The implementation from Seam Faces seems good to me, maybe use BeanManagerProvider to fire the event instead. 1+ For JPA Generic Repository. But if it hinders the plan to

[jira] [Comment Edited] (DELTASPIKE-341) Provide Integration between Faces Exceptions and Exception Handling

2013-06-03 Thread Cody Lerum (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13673180#comment-13673180 ] Cody Lerum edited comment on DELTASPIKE-341 at 6/3/13 2:55 PM: