Re: Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?

2014-02-17 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
@Gerhard: loos too much to existing JMX APIs + managed doesn't mean anything anymore today IMO Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-02-18 8:32 GMT+01:00 Gerhard

[jira] [Reopened] (DELTASPIKE-399) Incorporate Solder's ResourceLoader features into DeltaSpike

2014-02-17 Thread Gerhard Petracek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek reopened DELTASPIKE-399: - since people start blocking changes after a 0.x release, we can't wait for (user

[jira] [Updated] (DELTASPIKE-515) optional adapter for MockedJsfTestContainer

2014-02-17 Thread Gerhard Petracek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek updated DELTASPIKE-515: Attachment: (was: DELTASPIKE-5151.patch) > optional adapter for MockedJsfTe

[jira] [Updated] (DELTASPIKE-515) optional adapter for MockedJsfTestContainer

2014-02-17 Thread Gerhard Petracek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek updated DELTASPIKE-515: Attachment: DELTASPIKE-515.patch > optional adapter for MockedJsfTestContainer

Re: Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?

2014-02-17 Thread Gerhard Petracek
@thomas: maybe something like @Managed or @ManagedResource regards, gerhard 2014-02-18 7:17 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > @DeltaSpike? > Le 18 févr. 2014 06:26, "Christian Kaltepoth" a > écrit : > > > @Thomas: I also like the idea of a global qualifier like this. That's > > something I was

Re: Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?

2014-02-17 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
@DeltaSpike? Le 18 févr. 2014 06:26, "Christian Kaltepoth" a écrit : > @Thomas: I also like the idea of a global qualifier like this. That's > something I was already looking for when I created @Web back then. But the > most difficult question is what the name should be. Unfortunately I've no > r

Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2014-02-17 Thread Christian Kaltepoth
+1 for pushing out 0.6 ASAP and 1.0 as soon as all the "must have" features are complete. 2014-02-17 10:10 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : > Oki, I can help a bit with ViewAccessScoped. Romain and Thomas, please fix > the Tx stuff. > > In that case I'd say we gonna ship a 0.6 and then in 3 weeks move

Re: Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?

2014-02-17 Thread Christian Kaltepoth
@Thomas: I also like the idea of a global qualifier like this. That's something I was already looking for when I created @Web back then. But the most difficult question is what the name should be. Unfortunately I've no really good idea. 2014-02-15 15:26 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko : > +1 > Any i

[jira] [Updated] (DELTASPIKE-523) align event-packages

2014-02-17 Thread Gerhard Petracek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek updated DELTASPIKE-523: Description: exception-control isn't using an own "event" sub-package (like it

[jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-523) align event-packages

2014-02-17 Thread Gerhard Petracek (JIRA)
Gerhard Petracek created DELTASPIKE-523: --- Summary: align event-packages Key: DELTASPIKE-523 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-523 Project: DeltaSpike Issue Type: Tas

[jira] [Updated] (DELTASPIKE-515) optional adapter for MockedJsfTestContainer

2014-02-17 Thread Gerhard Petracek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek updated DELTASPIKE-515: Attachment: DELTASPIKE-5151.patch > optional adapter for MockedJsfTestContainer

Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2014-02-17 Thread Ove Ranheim
Hi Antoine, it's good to hear that more red hat committers are on its way :) On 17 Feb 2014, at 16:22, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote: > Yes Ove, too few Red Hat committers. But they’re will be one more when CDI > 1.2 will be out and work for preparing CDI 2.0 will be on track. > > Antoine Sabot-D

Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2014-02-17 Thread Cody Lerum
+1 On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Oki, I can help a bit with ViewAccessScoped. Romain and Thomas, please fix > the Tx stuff. > > In that case I'd say we gonna ship a 0.6 and then in 3 weeks move to 1.0. > > wdyt? > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > On Monday, 17 February

Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2014-02-17 Thread Antoine Sabot-Durand
Yes Ove, too few Red Hat committers. But they’re will be one more when CDI 1.2 will be out and work for preparing CDI 2.0 will be on track. Antoine Sabot-Durand ——— Twitter : @antoine_sd CDI co-spec lead & eco-system development Agorava tech lead Le 16 févr. 2014 à 22:38, Ove Ranhei

Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2014-02-17 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Mark, Dunno for the one week delay for 0.6 and 3 weeks delay for 1.0, but +1 to go with an intermediate step (ie. 0.6). JLouis 2014-02-17 13:14 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko : > +1 Mark > > > > 2014-02-17 13:08 GMT+01:00 Ove Ranheim : > > > +1 for this :) > > > > > > 2014-02-17 10:10 GMT+01:00 M

Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2014-02-17 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 Mark 2014-02-17 13:08 GMT+01:00 Ove Ranheim : > +1 for this :) > > > 2014-02-17 10:10 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : > > > Oki, I can help a bit with ViewAccessScoped. Romain and Thomas, please > fix > > the Tx stuff. > > > > In that case I'd say we gonna ship a 0.6 and then in 3 weeks move to 1.

Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2014-02-17 Thread Ove Ranheim
+1 for this :) 2014-02-17 10:10 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : > Oki, I can help a bit with ViewAccessScoped. Romain and Thomas, please fix > the Tx stuff. > > In that case I'd say we gonna ship a 0.6 and then in 3 weeks move to 1.0. > > wdyt? > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > On Monday, 17 February

Re: [Discuss] Data Module - Transactional Repositories

2014-02-17 Thread Thomas Hug
Ok with 3) you basically mean we don't rely on @Transactional, but rather on the TransactionStrategy? Sounds fine too. Would require some tricks to bridge from InvocationHandler to InvocationContext, and then again having the TXStrategy pick up the repository EM (haven't checked yet what that means

Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2014-02-17 Thread Nicklas Karlsson
+1 for this Documentation and examples are never complete but with that in mind one should not stop improving them "because they are never complete anyway" ;-) On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Oki, I can help a bit with ViewAccessScoped. Romain and Thomas, please fix >

Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2014-02-17 Thread Mark Struberg
Oki, I can help a bit with ViewAccessScoped. Romain and Thomas, please fix the Tx stuff. In that case I'd say we gonna ship a 0.6 and then in 3 weeks move to 1.0. wdyt? LieGrue, strub On Monday, 17 February 2014, 10:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi > > >can we wait 1 or 2 weeks (no mo

Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2014-02-17 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi can we wait 1 or 2 weeks (no more) to see if we can sort out @Repo/@Tx stuff? Basically I'm waiting after it for months and this is blocker to be used ATM. Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: h

Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2014-02-17 Thread Thomas Andraschko
IMHO ViewAccessScoped is a showstopper for the JSF users. Many people used CODI just because of it! But to be honest, if i will do it, it takes propably 2-4 weeks. I have currently only time at weekend... and i'm note sure if i know all details of the implementation ;) 2014-02-17 9:57 GMT+01:00

Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2014-02-17 Thread Mark Struberg
back 2 the topic, please! I'd say we should approach 1.0 NOW. DeltaSpike core and a few other modules is really rock solid already since a year or so. It is also used heavily in production already. There will always be some modules which are not so perfectly mature at times. E.g. if we will ad