[jira] [Commented] (DIRSTUDIO-1174) Directory Studio startup very slow due to schema LDIF processing

2018-03-25 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-1174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16412946#comment-16412946 ] Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRSTUDIO-1174: -- Thanks Stefan.   Knowing that, trying

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSTUDIO-1174) Directory Studio startup very slow due to schema LDIF processing

2018-03-25 Thread Stefan Seelmann (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-1174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16412953#comment-16412953 ] Stefan Seelmann commented on DIRSTUDIO-1174: I think it's easier to change the code to

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSTUDIO-1174) Directory Studio startup very slow due to schema LDIF processing

2018-03-25 Thread Stefan Seelmann (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-1174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16412959#comment-16412959 ] Stefan Seelmann commented on DIRSTUDIO-1174: Regarding antlr, we are still using version

Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRSTUDIO-1174) Directory Studio startup very slow due to schema LDIF processing

2018-03-25 Thread Lothar Haeger
Stefan Seelmann (JIRA) wrote: > I think it's easier to change the code to load the schema from LDIF lazily > when using it the first time. While I think that's a good move, what exactly happens when I delete the schema-*ldif files? Does Studio recreate them next time when opening a connection?

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSTUDIO-1174) Directory Studio startup very slow due to schema LDIF processing

2018-03-25 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-1174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16412920#comment-16412920 ] Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRSTUDIO-1174: -- Technically speaking, and 'benefiting'

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSTUDIO-1174) Directory Studio startup very slow due to schema LDIF processing

2018-03-25 Thread Stefan Seelmann (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-1174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16412940#comment-16412940 ] Stefan Seelmann commented on DIRSTUDIO-1174: Yes, we parse all cached schema at startup.

[jira] [Comment Edited] (DIRSTUDIO-1174) Directory Studio startup very slow due to schema LDIF processing

2018-03-25 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-1174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16412946#comment-16412946 ] Emmanuel Lecharny edited comment on DIRSTUDIO-1174 at 3/25/18 9:06 AM:

[jira] [Comment Edited] (DIRAPI-312) Add an explaination after the log error and message numbers

2018-03-25 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16403359#comment-16403359 ] Emmanuel Lecharny edited comment on DIRAPI-312 at 3/25/18 8:04 AM: ---

Re: Studio & Java 9

2018-03-25 Thread Stefan Seelmann
On 03/25/2018 07:06 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > So it seems it's related to bcprov 1.59. > > Actually, I'm not sure at all we still need bcprov. We used to do because > some part of kerberos was using DER encoding, and we were using teh DER > library from bcprov. This is not anymore the

Re: Studio & Java 9

2018-03-25 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 25/03/2018 à 19:21, Stefan Seelmann a écrit : > On 03/25/2018 06:48 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >> Hi Stefan, >> >> today, I tried to build Studio, and I get an error that makes me thing >> the trunk requires Java 9 to be built. Is that correct, or am I missing >> something ? >> >> INFO]

Re: Studio & Java 9

2018-03-25 Thread Stefan Seelmann
On 03/25/2018 06:48 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > today, I tried to build Studio, and I get an error that makes me thing > the trunk requires Java 9 to be built. Is that correct, or am I missing > something ? > > INFO] Resolving class path of MavenProject: >

Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRSTUDIO-1174) Directory Studio startup very slow due to schema LDIF processing

2018-03-25 Thread Lothar Haeger
Stefan Seelmann wrote: > Does Studio recreate them next time when opening a > > connection? > > Yes, every time the connection is opened and the schema is loaded it is > written to disk. So a simple pre-start script could simulate non-caching. I guess I'll give that a try and see how it works

Re: Studio & Java 9

2018-03-25 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 25/03/2018 à 19:06, Emmanuel Lecharny a écrit : > So it seems it's related to bcprov 1.59. > > Actually, I'm not sure at all we still need bcprov. We used to do because > some part of kerberos was using DER encoding, and we were using teh DER > library from bcprov. This is not anymore the

Re: Studio & Java 9

2018-03-25 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Now I have a failure here : --- T E S T S --- Running org.apache.directory.studio.test.integration.core.DirectoryApiConnectionWrapperTest Tests run: 23, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0,

[jira] [Commented] (DIRSTUDIO-1174) Directory Studio startup very slow due to schema LDIF processing

2018-03-25 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-1174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16413088#comment-16413088 ] Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRSTUDIO-1174: -- I'm not sure antlr4 brings a lot of

Studio & Java 9

2018-03-25 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Hi Stefan, today, I tried to build Studio, and I get an error that makes me thing the trunk requires Java 9 to be built. Is that correct, or am I missing something ? INFO] Resolving class path of MavenProject: org.apache.directory.studio:org.apache.directory.studio.aciitemeditor:2.0.0-SNAPSHOT @

Re: Studio & Java 9

2018-03-25 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
So it seems it's related to bcprov 1.59. Actually, I'm not sure at all we still need bcprov. We used to do because some part of kerberos was using DER encoding, and we were using teh DER library from bcprov. This is not anymore the case. I'll chekc if we can get rid f this lib in apacheds (we

Re: [jira] [Commented] (DIRSTUDIO-1174) Directory Studio startup very slow due to schema LDIF processing

2018-03-25 Thread Stefan Seelmann
On 03/25/2018 01:00 PM, Lothar Haeger wrote: > Stefan Seelmann (JIRA) wrote: > >> I think it's easier to change the code to load the schema from LDIF lazily >> when using it the first time. > > While I think that's a good move, what exactly happens when I delete the > schema-*ldif files? Does

Re: Studio & Java 9

2018-03-25 Thread Stefan Seelmann
On 03/25/2018 08:54 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Now I have a failure here : > > --- > T E S T S > --- > Running >

Re: Studio & Java 9

2018-03-25 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 25/03/2018 à 21:15, Stefan Seelmann a écrit : > On 03/25/2018 08:54 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >> Now I have a failure here : >> >> --- >> T E S T S >> --- >> Running >>

[jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-659) Support authentication with NT-ENTERPRISE principal names

2018-03-25 Thread Jiajia Li (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16413309#comment-16413309 ] Jiajia Li commented on DIRKRB-659: -- [~dmitry.bed...@gmail.com] Thanks for your patch, could you add the

[jira] [Assigned] (DIRKRB-706) pom for directory-kerby fails in eclipse

2018-03-25 Thread Jiajia Li (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jiajia Li reassigned DIRKRB-706: Assignee: Gerard Gagliano > pom for directory-kerby fails in eclipse >

[jira] [Resolved] (DIRKRB-706) pom for directory-kerby fails in eclipse

2018-03-25 Thread Jiajia Li (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jiajia Li resolved DIRKRB-706. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.0 1.1.1 Thanks Gerard. commit

[jira] [Commented] (DIRKRB-704) Refresh constants related to standards

2018-03-25 Thread Jiajia Li (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16413318#comment-16413318 ] Jiajia Li commented on DIRKRB-704: -- {quote}bq.  I guess it should be backmerged as well to 1.1.x? {quote}