Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
OOoAuthors work is currently licensed under CC-BY 2.5 or later (we'll
be progressively updating this to say 3.0 or later).
I was thinking of that license, too.
To allow for the possibility of this material being placed on the wiki
with minim
Hi,
On 2007-04-04, at 17:02 , Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
Frank Peters wrote:
Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
Frank Peters wrote:
I would second Andre in allowing wiki pages to specify a license
and have a default license for pages that do not specify the their
license.
That seems good to me, too...
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
Search just plain sucks. See
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52046
In spite of the open issue, nothing has improved.
Search on the main OOo website definitely sucks. Even if it
worked well (which it doesn't) for the HTML pages on the site, I
don'
Frank Peters wrote:
Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
Frank Peters wrote:
I would second Andre in allowing wiki pages to specify a license
and have a default license for pages that do not specify the their
license.
That seems good to me, too... But I'd rather not allow for even the
possibility of p
Andre wrote:
> Initially, it will result in a significant decrease in the number of
> FAQs. However, it will clear up the licensing issue. It should also
> ensure that the information is applicable for current (2.0) versions
> of OOo.
If this is the only way, I'd rather live with the non-perf
Hi,
On 2007-04-04, at 14:10 , Andre Schnabel wrote:
Hi Jonathon,
Jonathon Blake schrieb:
For Drew, Louis,etc:
My suggestion would be:
* Close down the wiki for a couple of weeks;
* Add a script that requires a specific licence (or one of a set of
licences) to be used for all material submit
Hi André,
On 2007-04-04, at 13:23 , Andre Schnabel wrote:
Thus,
"Content posted after [date] is Public Domain except where
otherwise noted, in which case copyright holders may use the
Public Document License (PDL), as noted in the License page of
OpenOffice.org, http://www.openof
Hi Jonathon,
Jonathon Blake schrieb:
For Drew, Louis,etc:
My suggestion would be:
* Close down the wiki for a couple of weeks;
* Add a script that requires a specific licence (or one of a set of
licences) to be used for all material submitted;
* Delete all existing content from the wiki;
* Ope
Doug wrote:
* My opinion: the OOo wiki is a public domain forum. I couldn't care
The major problems with claiming public domain are:
* Several major countries do not recognize the concept;
* For countries that do recognize "Public Domain", putting material in
the public domain from the date o
Hi Louis,
Louis Suarez-Potts schrieb:
That seems good to me, too... But I'd rather not allow for even the
possibility of proprietary licenses on the wiki, which the wording
suggested seems to permit, as does our current wording. Ie, I want
open licenses.
whatever is meant by proprietary lic
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 08:52 +1000, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> marbux wrote:
> > +1. Copyrighted material can be parked on another site and linked from
> > the wiki.
>
> Quite true, and that's more or less the situation we have now
> with the Docs website: it links to material that for various
>
Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
Hi,
On 2007-04-04, at 06:10 , Frank Peters wrote:
Andre Schnabel wrote:
So, I'd be happy with posting something like, "Content posted after
[date] is licensed in accordance with OpenOffice.org's license
policy, which can be found at
http://www.openoffice.org/licens
Hi,
On 2007-04-04, at 06:10 , Frank Peters wrote:
Andre Schnabel wrote:
So, I'd be happy with posting something like, "Content posted
after [date] is licensed in accordance with OpenOffice.org's
license policy, which can be found at http://www.openoffice.org/
license.html. Content posted
Andre Schnabel wrote:
So, I'd be happy with posting something like, "Content posted after
[date] is licensed in accordance with OpenOffice.org's license policy,
which can be found at http://www.openoffice.org/license.html. Content
posted prior to this date is copyrighted Sun Microsystems and
14 matches
Mail list logo
