[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] bonding: add support for PCI Port Hotplug

2015-07-18 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-15 16:32, Bernard Iremonger: > This patch depends on the Port Hotplug Framework. > It implements the rte_dev_uninit_t() function for the link bonding pmd. > > Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger > --- > drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond.h | 13 - >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/1] ring: changes to support PCI Port Hotplug

2015-07-18 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-07 14:09, Bernard Iremonger: > +static struct eth_driver rte_ring_pmd = { > + .pci_drv = { We really have to stop faking PCI. EAL must be changed to allow non-PCI drivers without workaround. A device can have no bus (virtual device) or a PCI bus or another one. Let's rework EAL for

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] hash: fix compilation for non-x86 systems

2015-07-18 Thread Thomas Monjalon
> >Hash library uses optimized compare functions that use > >x86 intrinsics, therefore non-x86 systems could not build > >the library. In that case, the compare function is set > >to the generic memcmp. > > > >Fixes: 48a399119619 ("hash: replace with cuckoo hash implementation") > > >

[dpdk-dev] Wireless NICs are supported?

2015-07-18 Thread Woojoong Kim
Dear All. Few months ago, I found DPDK in order to expand my research and implementation ability. However, all of DPDK documents did not mentioned about applications based on wireless NICs. Does DPDK supports for wireless NICs? If it doesn't, does have any try for wirelss NICs? Best Regards,

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: fix the vq size issue

2015-07-18 Thread Ouyang, Changchun
Hi Stephen, > -Original Message- > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org] > Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 12:28 AM > To: Ouyang, Changchun > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: fix the vq size issue > > On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:48:50 +0800

[dpdk-dev] Wireless NICs are supported?

2015-07-18 Thread Choi, Sy Jong
Hi Mr.Kim, We don't have wireless nic supported, since DPDK is design for high speed dataplane, at this moment there are not wireless NIC support. May I know what is the performance are you looking at to achieve? Regards, Choi, Sy Jong Platform Application Engineer -Original Message-

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] doc: Update documentation to reflect FreeBSD support for CXGBE PMD

2015-07-18 Thread Rahul Lakkireddy
Update cxgbe documentation to include support for FreeBSD: 1. Add instructions on how to compile CXGBE PMD in FreeBSD. 2. Add instructions on how to flash firmware image on Chelsio T5 cards in FreeBSD. 3. Add sample application usage for FreeBSD. 4. Add an extra step to reload kernel module in

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] cxgbe: Enable and fix FreeBSD compilation for CXGBE PMD

2015-07-18 Thread Rahul Lakkireddy
Fix "MACRO redefined" and "function redefined" compilation errors in FreeBSD by adding CXGBE prefix to them. Also remove reference to a linux header linux/if_ether.h and use DPDK macros directly. Finally, enable CXGBE PMD for FreeBSD. Signed-off-by: Rahul Lakkireddy Signed-off-by: Kumar

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] nic_uio: Fix to allow any device to be bound to nic_uio

2015-07-18 Thread Rahul Lakkireddy
nic_uio requires the pci ids to be present in rte_pci_dev_ids.h in order to bind the devices to nic_uio. However, it's better to remove this whitelist of pci ids, and instead rely on hw.nic_uio.bdfs kenv parameter to allow binding any device to nic_uio. Suggested-by: David Marchand

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] cxgbe: Fix compilation and enable FreeBSD support for CXGBE PMD

2015-07-18 Thread Rahul Lakkireddy
This series of patches fix compilation and enable CXGBE poll mode driver for FreeBSD. The first patch fixes a limitation of nic_uio that only binds to devices present in rte_pci_dev_ids.h. The second patch does the actual compilation fix and enabling of CXGBE PMD for FreeBSD. The last patch

[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-virtio] Performance tuning for dpdk with virtio?

2015-07-18 Thread Clearasu
Forgot to mention, I am running dpdk within the VM and used virtio-net-pmd. > On Jul 17, 2015, at 2:20 PM, Stephen Hemminger networkplumber.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:03:15 -0700 > Clarylin L wrote: > >> I am running dpdk with a virtual guest as a L2 forwarder. >> >> If the