[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pdump: revert PCI device name conversion

> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Reshma Pattan > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 5:32 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Cc: Pattan, Reshma > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pdump: revert PCI device name conversion > > Earlier ethdev library created the

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] Refactor of debug information on cryptodev tests

> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Pablo de Lara > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 3:11 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Cc: De Lara Guarch, Pablo > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] Refactor of debug information on > cryptodev tests > > The

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] port: code clean-up

Hi Thomas, The reason for removing RTE_NEXT_ABI here is caused by sink port, which is not wrapped by RTE_NEXT_ABI macro. If the user disable RTE_NEXT_ABI but enable RTE_PORT_PCAP, the original code will cause the compile error as pcap library is missing. Regards, Fan On 01/04/2016 14:56,

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] port: code clean-up

- From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com] Sent: Friday, April 1, 2016 2:56 PM To: Zhang, Roy Fan Cc: dev at dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] port: code clean-up 2016-04-01 14:41, Fan Zhang: > --- a/mk/rte.app.mk > +++ b/mk/rte.app.mk > @@ -92,9 +92,7 @@ endi

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] example/ip_pipeline: add PCAP file support

Hi Thomas, Sorry about that. I will -Original Message- From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com] Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 11:11 AM To: Zhang, Roy Fan Cc: dev at dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] example/ip_pipeline: add PCAP file support This patch

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test/test_table_acl: fix incorrect IP header

Hi Thomas, Sorry for lack of detailed description in this patch. The patch was not actually a fix but just adding the missing field in the ipv4 5tuple area. I will send different patch with more detailed description on this. Regards, Fan On 16/03/2016 20:30, Thomas Monjalon

[dpdk-dev] Patch "Increased number of next hops for LPM IPv4" break IP Pipeline application

Hi Michal, Your patch "Increased number of next hops for LPM IPv4" (http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-March/035269.html) is breaking the IP Pipeline application. Without this patch, the application runs successfully. The IP Pipeline failed on executing the following command:

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/1] jobstats: added function abort for job

On 12/02/2016 16:04, Marcin Kerlin wrote: > This patch adds new function rte_jobstats_abort. It marks *job* as finished > and > time of this work will be add to management time instead of execution time. > This > function should be used instead of rte_jobstats_finish if condition occurs, >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] lib/librte_port: add packet dumping to PCAP file support in sink port

Hi Panu, Thank you again for careful review and comments. On 28/01/2016 11:43, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 01/27/2016 07:39 PM, Fan Zhang wrote: >> Originally, sink ports in librte_port releases received mbufs back to >> mempool. This patch adds optional packet dumping to PCAP feature in sink >>

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] lib/librte_port: add PCAP file support to source port

Hi Panu, Thank you for the careful review and comments. On 28/01/2016 11:54, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 01/27/2016 07:39 PM, Fan Zhang wrote: >> Originally, source ports in librte_port is an input port used as packet >> generator. Similar to Linux kernel /dev/zero character device, it >>

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: update release notes for ip_pipeline app

> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jasvinder Singh > Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 5:04 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: update release notes for ip_pipeline app > > This patch updates the release notes with