Hi folks,
I think I have been out of the loop - are we talking about DI of
services (i.e. no call to ServiceManager) or injecting complex data
objects?
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Leo Simons wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Robert Burrell
> Donkin wrote:
>
>> a
eers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler ha scritto:
You might want to have a look at the Avalon-Spring bridge from the
Apache Cocoon project. This allows you to use Avalon/Excalibur
configurations and components as Spring beans - which is very
interesting if you already
other
containers (such as Spring).
Cheers
Siegfried Goeschl
PS: Since I developed fulcrum-yaafi this is not a completely objective
view ... :-)
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Development Innova4j wrote:
Hi Excalibur Team, I need to select a java framework for development
new applications, in the
Hi folks,
remembering the following pieces
http://excalibur.apache.org/apidocs/org/apache/avalon/framework/component/Component.html
http://wiki.apache.org/excalibur/ExcaliburHistory (How Components Became
Services)
IMHO it seems reasonable to remove the Component ...
Cheers,
Siegfried
Thread Local Storage and use a second interceptor to sneak this email
header into your MimeMessage. And if you would have a scripting language
at hand you could do it NOW and HERE.
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
PS: If anyone is interested in lending
Hi Leo,
I think I have to bite the buller then and set
+) urn:avalon:partition ==> component.logger
+) urn:avalon:name ==> component.id
The definite answer might come up during the integration tests
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Leo Simons wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 05:04:12PM
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FORTRESS-20?page=comments#action_12331784
]
Siegfried Goeschl commented on FORTRESS-20:
---
Environment
==
+) avalon-framework-*-4.3.jar
+) log4j
smarter implementation, e.g. to
provide JNDI lookup
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I'm apologize for the sligthly misleading subject - it should read
"A question regaring Avalon context mappings from Merlin to Avalon
Fortress" .
text names and I got stuck with the "urn:avalon:partition"
and "urn:avalon:name". So your answer is potentially definite but it
doesn't solve my problem at hand ... :-(
Thanks in advance
Siegfried Goeschl
Stephen McConnell wrote:
-Original Messag
finite answer?
Thanks in advance
Siegfried Goeschl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rvice lookup, i.e. you are not any longer concerned if you
are accessing an Avalon service or a good-old Turbine service.
General
===
+) I updated the Fulcrum web site to reflect the curren
: Siegfried Goeschl
In Log4J 1.2.12 and 1.3alpha-6 the methods isFatalEnabled, isErrorEnabled and
isWarnEnabled are removed and result in a runtime error. This affects all
versions of the Avalon framework.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent
l
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Torsten Schlabach wrote:
Hi folks,
I know it's only a minor issue but it has been staying around for six
weeks with nobody even commenting on this and it it annoying.
I am talking about this issue:
FORTRESS-18 JavaDoc on site is incomplete
http://issues.
py with just two of
them.
What do you think?
+) making Fulcrum components compatible to Fortress is a good idea
+) using Fortress as default Avalon container is currently not on my
list - but again this is my strictly personal opinion.
Cheers,
Siegfri
is there a
startingpoint I have overlooked?!
Thanks in advance,
Siegfried Goeschl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
going work regarding Fortress
and Fulcrum YAAFI.
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Maybe the James folks might be interested to hear that
J Aaron Farr wrote:
Thanks for the clarifications. I'm very interested in seeing what
Excalibur can do to make things easier for the Turbine folks.
can
shed some light on plans for the future hint, hint.
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
J Aaron Farr wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:44:18 +0100, Siegfried Goeschl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The usage szenario would be : you find a few funky Fulcrum services but
they
service it should ask all its children
implementing ServiceManager. In this case it is not a big deal since
this is the only sensible solution to provide container-transparent
access to components. But in Excalibur land it has a rather akward semantic.
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
peter royal wrote
econfiguration needs - better than nothing.
BTW - any objections to replace JCoverage with Clover reports?!
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Eric Pugh wrote:
Sounds great!
I won't be able to help too much on the coding side, but I am definitly
able to help on the integration side of things using Gump
HELP
===
1) Help from the Excalibur community would be greatly appreciated to
kickstart component compatibilty testing
2) Any who would like to work on bleeding-edge Fulcrum/Turbine?!
Thanks in advance
Siegfried Goeschl
---
a hand in settting up a page capturing available
Avalon components
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Stephen McConnell wrote:
-Original Message-----
From: Siegfried Goeschl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 December 2004 18:55
To: Excalibur Developers List
Subject: Re: How is responsible for avalon-fra
how to proceed from here?! - I would appreciate if Jakarta folks
could coordinate themselves to make the components reusable across
different containers. From a programming point of view this would
involve Fulcrum and Excalibur while Metro is following its own path.
A toe stepping and un-polit
are really ehmm
improvable.. Each container has its own ideas about naming the entries
of the context and there is no "exists()" to facilitate querying the
context apart from catching the exceptions when you are plainly wrong.
Not a big deal but I'm just curious
Thanks in ad
Was it really that easy without looking at the docs :-)
Siegfried Goeschl
Farr, Aaron wrote:
-Original Message-
From: hammett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 2:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Excalibur Developers List; Eric Pugh
Subject: Re: A few thoughts
already in place
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Farr, Aaron wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Crafter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd be +1 to add some external links to the Excalibur website pointing
poeple to the other services available.
Gang, what do you think?
+1
I us
services ... :-)
Thanks in advance
Siegfried Goeschl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache Excalibur Project -- URL: http://excalibur.apache.org/
26 matches
Mail list logo
