Hello Felix,
On Aug 12, 2013, at 7:52 AM, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@adobe.com wrote:
Currently our Declarative Services implementation statically binds
configuration to the using bundle when such configuration is used to
configure a component. The intent was to follow the Configuration
Hi Felix,
I have now updated JIRA. I was about to write an email asking one of the
PMCs to upload the artifacts in the dist area. Thanks for doing the
needful.
Thanks,
Sahoo
On Monday 12 August 2013 11:14 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi Sahoo
I granted you permission on JIRA.
I also
The Felix team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Felix Preferences
Service version 1.0.6:
http://felix.apache.org/site/apache-felix-preferences-service.html
This release is available from http://felix.apache.org/site/downloads.cgi and
Maven:
dependency
Hi,
The process as documented in [1] to update obr is not clear to me. How
do I actually update repository.xml with released artifacts? Do I
checkout from the svn tag and run the maven command? It does not sound
correct, since it will lead to regeneration of artifacts. Ideally I
would like
Hi Sahoo
Good point.
I am not sure, whether the package build phase would be sufficient and you
don't actually need the install build phase. The actual repository.xml
maintenance takes place in the org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin:deploy
goal which just adds references to the maven
Hi
Am 12.08.2013 um 08:16 schrieb Marcel Offermans:
Hello Felix,
On Aug 12, 2013, at 7:52 AM, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@adobe.com wrote:
Currently our Declarative Services implementation statically binds
configuration to the using bundle when such configuration is used to
configure a
Hi,
I was under the impression that setting the location of the configuration to
null when the bundle that owns the configuration is uninstalled was the
responsibility of config admin. Config admin sets the location when you call
getConfiguration using the bundle's CA, surely it is also CA's
I don't think you're missing something. The spec states CA should be doing that
already, so if our implementation is not, we should raise a bug.
Greetings, Marcel
On Aug 12, 2013, at 9:40 , David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I was under the impression that setting the location
See FELIX-3360, where I raised the same issue and provided a patch.
The patch may be outdated by now, I didn't check recently.
Regards
Julian
[0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3360
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Marcel Offermans
marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
I don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13737158#comment-13737158
]
David Jencks commented on FELIX-3360:
-
I am quite sure this is a CA problem not a DS
It's the maven-bundle-plugin:deploy goal that takes care of updating
obr, so I would like to believe package phase would be sufficient. But,
it's still not clear how I am supposed to update obr using the artifacts
that are already created during release process? If I checkout from the
svn tag
11 matches
Mail list logo