Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1 (binding): Stuart McCulloch, Pierre De Rop, Guillaume Nodet, Clement
Escoffier
+1 (non binding): David Bosschaert, Jean-Baptiste Onofré, Achim Nierbeck,
Grzegorz Grzybek, Jamie Goodyear, Mark Derricutt
I will copy this release to the
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Jamie
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 Jun 2014, at 09:54, Grzegorz Grzybek gr.grzy...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
I did a test with latest fabric8 and all went well after little
modification:
We had this
Here’s my +1 ( still looking for a few more binding votes, so if people can
take a look it would be appreciated :)
On 23 Jun 2014, at 15:05, Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I’ve fixed the issue reported in
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@felix.apache.org/msg15423.html and
Hi Stuart;
+1 from me
(tested with jdk8 and ipojo).
regards;
/Pierre
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I’ve fixed the issue reported in
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@felix.apache.org/msg15423.html and have
restaged the 2.5.0 release...
+1
2014-06-23 16:05 GMT+02:00 Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I’ve fixed the issue reported in
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@felix.apache.org/msg15423.html and have
restaged the 2.5.0 release...
We solved 7 issues in this release, the major ones being the bndlib 2.3.0
+1 (non-binding) here - no NullPointers in sight.
Sad to see it still doesn't compile under JDK8 tho ( evil wildcard
imports! ) - but thats minor.
On 26 Jun 2014, at 7:57, Pierre De Rop wrote:
Hi Stuart;
+1 from me
(tested with jdk8 and ipojo).
regards;
/Pierre
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at
+1,
Regards,
Clement
Sent from my iPhone
On 25 juin 2014, at 21:39, Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com wrote:
Here’s my +1 ( still looking for a few more binding votes, so if people can
take a look it would be appreciated :)
On 23 Jun 2014, at 15:05, Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com
+1 (non-binding)
I did a test with latest fabric8 and all went well after little
modification:
We had this default:
Private-Package!*/Private-Package
But it seems that it resulted in empty JARs - the above setting overrode
Export-Packageio.fabric8.xxx*/Export-Package
Shouldn't we use
On 24 Jun 2014, at 09:54, Grzegorz Grzybek gr.grzy...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
I did a test with latest fabric8 and all went well after little
modification:
We had this default:
Private-Package!*/Private-Package
But it seems that it resulted in empty JARs - the above
Hi,
I’ve fixed the issue reported in
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@felix.apache.org/msg15423.html and have
restaged the 2.5.0 release...
We solved 7 issues in this release, the major ones being the bndlib 2.3.0
upgrade to support Java 8 bytecode and a new baselining feature:
+1 from me.
David
On 23 June 2014 15:05, Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I’ve fixed the issue reported in
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@felix.apache.org/msg15423.html and have
restaged the 2.5.0 release...
We solved 7 issues in this release, the major ones being the
+1 (non binding)
Just tested, it looks good to me.
Regards
JB
On 06/23/2014 04:05 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
Hi,
I’ve fixed the issue reported in
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@felix.apache.org/msg15423.html and have
restaged the 2.5.0 release...
We solved 7 issues in this release,
+1 (non binding)
tested with jdk8
regards, Achim
2014-06-23 16:52 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net:
+1 (non binding)
Just tested, it looks good to me.
Regards
JB
On 06/23/2014 04:05 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
Hi,
I’ve fixed the issue reported in
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On 06/23/2014 04:05 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
Hi,
I’ve fixed the issue reported in
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@felix.apache.org/msg15423.html and have
restaged the 2.5.0 release...
We solved 7 issues in this release, the major ones being the bndlib 2.3.0
14 matches
Mail list logo
