On 11/12/09 22:28, Royce Ausburn wrote:
I've got my handler working properly now, but I'm unhappy that I need to add the
-Djava.protocol.handler.pkgs=my.pkg.prefix property to my application container's startup
configuration. Ideally I could update the system property in some startup code and
>> I've got my handler working properly now, but I'm unhappy that I need to add
>> the -Djava.protocol.handler.pkgs=my.pkg.prefix property to my application
>> container's startup configuration. Ideally I could update the system
>> property in some startup code and have one less thing to make s
Hey Karl,
> Well, handlers are cached by the jvm so there shouldn't be any
> unstable handlers for a given protocol except that they are unstable
> by definition as you can just write a bundle that exposes a
> URLHandlers service. In this case, the framework will just delegate to
> that one as lo
On 11/12/09 7:46, Royce Ausburn wrote:
Hi again,
I've got my handler working properly now, but I'm unhappy that I need to add the
-Djava.protocol.handler.pkgs=my.pkg.prefix property to my application container's startup
configuration. Ideally I could update the system property in some startup
Well, handlers are cached by the jvm so there shouldn't be any
unstable handlers for a given protocol except that they are unstable
by definition as you can just write a bundle that exposes a
URLHandlers service. In this case, the framework will just delegate to
that one as long as its there. Is th
Hi again,
I've got my handler working properly now, but I'm unhappy that I need to add
the -Djava.protocol.handler.pkgs=my.pkg.prefix property to my application
container's startup configuration. Ideally I could update the system property
in some startup code and have one less thing to make su
Just wanted to confirm I'm a fool and it's all working beautifully. Sorry for
the false alarm =)
--Royce
On 10/11/2009, at 8:43 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
> Yes, we do fallback to the java.protocol.handler.pkgs system property.
> Let us know if you run into any difficulties with that as it would b
Yes, we do fallback to the java.protocol.handler.pkgs system property.
Let us know if you run into any difficulties with that as it would be
a bug if that doesn't work :-)
regards,
Karl
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Royce Ausburn wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I've been doing a little more reading o
Hi again,
I've been doing a little more reading of the code and I think I was mistaken.
Looks like the lookup is done properly in URLHandlers.getBuiltInStreamHandler().
Sorry - must have got a wire crossed.
--Royce
On 10/11/2009, at 2:13 PM, Royce Ausburn wrote:
> G'day all,
>
> I'm porting
