Re: Update Mockito to the latest version

2019-11-28 Thread Yemdjih Kaze Nasser
I'll do that in thesam pull request for dependency management On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 04:40, Michael Vorburger wrote: > On Thu, 28 Nov 2019, 19:38 Yemdjih Kaze Nasser, > wrote: > >> Implementing spring bom dependency management breaks build with mockito >> version 1.9.5 >> I suggest mockito be

Re: Update Mockito to the latest version

2019-11-28 Thread Michael Vorburger
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019, 19:38 Yemdjih Kaze Nasser, wrote: > Implementing spring bom dependency management breaks build with mockito > version 1.9.5 > I suggest mockito be upgraded to version 3 > Pull Requests for this would certainly be welcome. >

Update Mockito to the latest version

2019-11-28 Thread Yemdjih Kaze Nasser
Implementing spring bom dependency management breaks build with mockito version 1.9.5 I suggest mockito be upgraded to version 3

Re: Test Cases Management In Jira

2019-11-28 Thread Vinod Kumar Manik
>>What could be interesting, once we have this, could be for people to look at whether (some of) it could then be automated... @Vinod Kumar Manik , is it possible to mark that the test case is covered by automation or not? Yes, this will help in deciding able to automate or not. We can customize

Re: [Mifos-developer] Development Environment For Fineract Backenf

2019-11-28 Thread Awasum Yannick
In addition, just using the ./gradlew clean tomcatRunWar, tasks is enough to test your changes in a local dev environment. This runs in 2 minutes. This is how local dev is tested now given spring boot dev tools are not yet enabled. On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 10:19 AM Michael Vorburger wrote: >

Re: [Mifos-developer] Development Environment For Fineract Backenf

2019-11-28 Thread Michael Vorburger
Kuziwa, I'm adding dev@fineract.apache.org in CC, where more people interested in backend development are. I suspect that you are looking for faster turnaround for local development, not CI/CD for e.g. UAT? The best solution would be to use Spring Boot Dev mode, instead of WAR on external

Re: Fineract Community Survey Results Nov2019

2019-11-28 Thread Awasum Yannick
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 9:33 AM Victor Romero wrote: > Hi James, > > Thank you for sharing the results. They are very good picture of the > current status, in my opinion, the survey could be scheduled (e.g. > quarterly) and then review the progress of each indicator based on the > actions taken

Re: Fineract Community Survey Results Nov2019

2019-11-28 Thread Victor Romero
Hi James, Thank you for sharing the results. They are very good picture of the current status, in my opinion, the survey could be scheduled (e.g. quarterly) and then review the progress of each indicator based on the actions taken in the previous period.