Re: Fineract 1.x HA setup and performance

2019-12-06 Thread Michael Vorburger
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019, 06:55 Victor Romero, wrote: > Hi Dave, > > IN GCP my suggestion instead of Galera Cluster is Cloud SQL. > +1 from me for using Cloud SQL, a "fully vmanaged MySQL", when deploying Fineract on Google Cloud, that seems quite sensible and logical. (Full disclosure: I'm

Re: Fineract 1.x HA setup and performance

2019-12-02 Thread Victor Romero
Hi Dave, IN GCP my suggestion instead of Galera Cluster is Cloud SQL. For Galera Cluster we have done the setup using bare bones, getting away of  VM/Containers, tuning has been done at hardware, linux and code level. We have done performance

Re: Fineract 1.x HA setup and performance

2019-12-01 Thread Dave Martin
Cloud instance spec: 8GB mem 2.3 GHz cpu Debian 9 On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 9:48 AM Dave Martin wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > > I have setup fineract 1.x (latest master) on a google cloud instance and > we are not getting the expected results when running load tests. > > Using docker-compose with a

Fineract 1.x HA setup and performance

2019-12-01 Thread Dave Martin
Hi Everyone, I have setup fineract 1.x (latest master) on a google cloud instance and we are not getting the expected results when running load tests. Using docker-compose with a few tweaks: - 2 x fineract-server services - 3 x mariadb-galera nodes (multi-master) - 1 x HAProxy acting