1) It's mobile-only.
2) It's hard to change the skinning of it.
On Feb 12, 2013, at 10:57 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I haven't been following this thread in detail. What is wrong with the
> spark.components.ToggleSwitch in the mobilecomponents.swc?
Hi,
> I will try this later and give you feedback.
I updated the script today to support AIR 3.6 and also fixed the path issue you
pointed out.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
I can confirm that the SDK compiles and passes the check in tests when run in
the 11.6 content debugger. Would be interesting to know if it passes all tests.
I update the various scripts to support AIR 3.6 and Flash Player 11.6.
Thanks,
Justin
Well part of the issue is to reduce the barriers so that people with
limited time can be more effective and/or get up to speed quickly.
Currently downloading, installing and running the tests takes a fair
amount of manual setup and effort, have an easier way to run to run tests
(one click muste
Hi,
> And like your machine and you I guess, I'm on my spared time
Yep.
> I would like much more people on the sdk
Well part of the issue is to reduce the barriers so that people with limited
time can be more effective and/or get up to speed quickly. Currently
downloading, installing and runnin
Hi,
> Why is that? I run them overnight on a 3-year-old mac.
That's sometimes possible. I actually do have 2 other machines that need to be
setup/fixed so do have a solution just not right this second, but been a bit
short of time.
> Someone really should make sure the branch completely passes
Sorry I missed this post, yeah I'm pretty sure because I use to run tests
each time I do something but I can check again !
-Message d'origine-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 5:25 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9.1
On 2/12/13 8:14 PM, "Fré
Well, to be clear, happily, there is Justin, Om, Alex and all the other
great Abobe guys and some others from js part but we clearly don't miss
people talking, we miss people doing...
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 5:33 AM
To: dev@flex.apa
-Message d'origine-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 5:28 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9.1
If that someone is going to be me,
then I guess this release will take a bit longer to get done
Glad to hear !!
On 2/12/13 7:56 PM, "Justin Mclea
And like your machine and you I guess, I'm on my spared time, I've got a job
and work every day, I would like much more people on the sdk; I didn't
commit things because of the failed tests, surely not my fault but I didn't
dare to commit before the tests passed, I haven't got the time and the l
On 2/12/13 7:56 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> HI,
>
>> it takes time for sure but I think it's important, am I wrong ?
> No your not wrong it's important. It's just currently I have no way of
> conveniently running the full tests.
Why is that? I run them overnight on a 3-year-old mac.
> If s
On 2/12/13 8:14 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
> And just to recall the failed tests:
> ...
Are these failures from running the mustella tests in Release4.9 against the
Release4.9 code?
Are you sure any language failures are not caused by the change to
flex-config.xml?
>
>
>
> -Message d
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > The installer is not configured to look at RCs of the flex sdk.
> So currently it can't be tested with RC? We have to make a SDK release,
> publish it and then make an installer SDK RC?
>
>
You need to test the sdk independently, pu
And just to recall the failed tests:
LangPacks/Japanese/tests/creditCardValidatorTests
JA_CreditCardValidator_InvalidCharError
LangPacks/Japanese/tests/creditCardValidatorTests
JA_CreditCardValidator_invalidNumberError
LangPacks/Japanese/tests/creditCardValidatorTests
JA_CreditCardValidator_wr
Well, fine, heard you but I can't buy you a machine :)
Even with the last release we didn't check (and test) everythings but a kind
of quality would be good, I did run tests which failed and apparently it
wasn't a problem to do a release, I just would like to share that.
-Message d'origi
Hi,
> The installer is not configured to look at RCs of the flex sdk.
So currently it can't be tested with RC? We have to make a SDK release, publish
it and then make an installer SDK RC?
Also when testing how do you stop the installer form getting the published XML
config file but get the RC o
HI,
> it takes time for sure but I think it's important, am I wrong ?
No your not wrong it's important. It's just currently I have no way of
conveniently running the full tests. If someone want to buy me a testing
machine I'll be more than grateful :-)
I did run the check in tests and this is n
You missed /sdk in the flex sdk path. But that would still cause the
installer to look under dist release, not dist dev.
The installer is not configured to look at RCs of the flex sdk. It always
expects a relative path and looks at the mirror url to fetch the sdk. You
might want to modify the i
well, I'm sad to say that but I use to update before I commit, I use to run
the tests before I commit and I'm still pretty sure I can miss something but
I do that, it takes time for sure but I think it's important, am I wrong ?
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Wednesday,
FYI - This 4.9.1 RC1 fixes at least the "locale" issue that I had --- with the
workaround being to manually replace en_US with {locale} in
framework/flex-config.xml file.
I tested using command line mxmlc and with the 4.9.1 release candidate I no
longer have to edit the framework/flex-config.xm
Radiate is super cool...way beyond my ability to contribute but, I'd be
happy to purchase a copy when it's finished.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Om
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 6:59 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Radia
Hi,
> It looks like you are working the the Release4.9 branch, right?
Yep.
> Does it pass Mustella for you?
It passes the check in tests, I didn't run a full mustella as currently I don't
have a spare machine to run the tests on. For the previous release there were
a large number of changes
On 2/12/13 4:51 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I made a 4.9.1 release candidate if you want to check it out and see if it
> fixes the locale issue. Alex wants a few other fixes into the 4.9.1 release so
> we'll hold off on voting it in as an official release.
But I am hoping not to have
Hi,
I just updated the installer to grab the 4.9.1 RC but it doesn't seem to be
working?
In the config file I changed the following:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/2.0/rc1/binaries/";
file="apache-flex-sdk-installer-2.0.3-bin" />
What did I miss?
Thanks,
Justin
On 2/12/13 3:14 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I think we should investigate and fix all of the issues I listed before
>> releasing again.
>
> Fair enough. I'll put it up as RC1so if anyone wants it they can use it now.
> I wont bother calling a vote.
It looks like you are working th
Hi,
I made a 4.9.1 release candidate if you want to check it out and see if it
fixes the locale issue. Alex wants a few other fixes into the 4.9.1 release so
we'll hold off on voting it in as an official release.
Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC can be found here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/fle
Jude,
This looks fantastic. And it looks well thought out as well. We've had
some discussions in the past on this list about a tool like this. Do you
have any plans of contributing it to Apache Flex? I would be interested in
in helping expand this tool. I am a spread out a bit too think with
Hi,
Just a FYI for anything making a build as the RCs are checked into SVN it's
slower than before. It taking more time to checking in the RC than it took to
build it :-)
Justin
I will try this later and give you feedback.
Am 12.02.2013 um 23:04 schrieb Justin Mclean :
> HI,
>
>> I think there is an error in the addAIRtoSDK.sh.
> Quite possibly - your quite possibly the first person to test it :-) Did you
> change the script as you suggested and give it a go?
>
> Th
Hi,
> I think we should investigate and fix all of the issues I listed before
> releasing again.
Fair enough. I'll put it up as RC1so if anyone wants it they can use it now. I
wont bother calling a vote.
Justin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikko Torniainen updated FLEX-33389:
Attachment: (was: FLEX33389.mxml)
> The width of the last column header on a horizo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikko Torniainen updated FLEX-33389:
Attachment: Flex-33389.air
I feel my message isn't getting trough. I've added a new version
On 2/12/13 2:50 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> What do you want to see fixed in this release?
> Up to the community really I was hoping someone would step forward and make a
> 4.10 release but there's been no takers. I happy to build and sign things but
> only have limited time right n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikko Torniainen updated FLEX-33389:
Attachment: (was: Flex-33389.air)
> The width of the last column header on a horizo
Hi,
> What do you want to see fixed in this release?
Up to the community really I was hoping someone would step forward and make a
4.10 release but there's been no takers. I happy to build and sign things but
only have limited time right now and will be travelling most of March.
I have just mad
> Hi,
> - ActionScript/Flex support is included in IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate Edition
> only [1]
> - 30-day free fully functional trial period [2]. Afterwards you can ask
> sa...@jetbrains.com to extend trial period.
> - members of open source projects (e.g. Apache Flex committers) can apply for
> a
Justin,
What do you want to see fixed in this release? I think there is now at
least five regressions from Adobe 4.6. My first reaction is that we should
fix them all in order to get folks back to "parity".
The list looks like:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33390 (SVG transcoding b
HI,
> I think there is an error in the addAIRtoSDK.sh.
Quite possibly - your quite possibly the first person to test it :-) Did you
change the script as you suggested and give it a go?
Thanks,
Justin
Ups...
I think there is an error in the addAIRtoSDK.sh.
Line 94
tar xf "${airTempDir}/air.tbz2" -C "${IDE_SDK_DIR}/frameworks/"
I think it should be
tar xf "${airTempDir}/air.tbz2" -C "${IDE_SDK_DIR}/"
I used the script
./addAIRtoSDK.sh "3.5" "/path_to_my_flex_folder/my_flex_
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carol Frampton resolved FLEX-33389.
---
Resolution: Not A Problem
Fix Version/s: Apache Flex 4.9.0
Since you did not provide a
Hi,
> Can you consider my last five commits ?
Probably best left for the 4.10 release.
> When do you plan to launch the release ?
Depends on my time which is very limited right now and how much time other
committers and PMC member can put in to test and vote. I'm not expecting the
same number o
HI,
> So, actually there are differences between the swc files and sources, right?
Not 100% sure I understand thw question but the swc files are compiled from the
4.9.0 source, so there nothing extra in the swc files if that's your concern.
Thanks,
Justin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikko Torniainen updated FLEX-33389:
Attachment: lastcolumn.png
Screenshot as requested. I'm running air 3.5. Here you can see w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13577007#comment-13577007
]
Carol Frampton commented on FLEX-33389:
---
I ran your app. I do not see anything wron
On 2/12/13 11:58 AM, "Sebastian Mohr" wrote:
> Hehe Alex,
>
> I already feared somebody would say that ;)
>> I believe that LGPL is off-limits for Apache.
>
> Opensource != Opensource ;) This Legal stuff
> is pretty annoying sometimes. However, as you
> can see in the code [1], the spark.com
I understand clear as mud, that is exactly what it was to you. My
point is that sometimes when I am creating things from scratch as in
AMD, I am not going to commit it right off the bat because I don't
want to be moving files around and doing a bunch of nosensical
commits, that is the way I
Hehe Alex,
I already feared somebody would say that ;)
> I believe that LGPL is off-limits for Apache.
Opensource != Opensource ;) This Legal stuff
is pretty annoying sometimes. However, as you
can see in the code [1], the spark.components.CheckBox
can be reused to provide a ToggleSwitch look&fee
I believe that LGPL is off-limits for Apache.
On 2/12/13 11:33 AM, "Sebastian Mohr" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the eskimo library [1][2] also has a toggleswitch skin
> for the spark.components.CheckBox component [3].
> The Eskimo guys use the LGPL license. Would this
> of need for us?
>
--
Alex Harui
Hi,
the eskimo library [1][2] also has a toggleswitch skin
for the spark.components.CheckBox component [3].
The Eskimo guys use the LGPL license. Would this
of need for us?
--
Sebastian (PPMC)
Interaction Designer
Looking for a Login Example with Apache Flex? Please check out this code:
http:/
Just to clarify some stuff, since this is my "first day back on the
job after a week long sick leave which was supposed to a ski vacation"
(and I'm a bit cranky still as a result... I really shouldn't be in
public) and I need to get back up to speed on our lovely project:
> You don't need to test
Well, bad formatting aside, (it's been a while since I blogged) I put up a
blog post which can be seen here:
http://inspiredflash.blogspot.co.il/2013/02/finally-some-tools-to-go-from.html
If anyone would like me to alter any of the post, or found I didn't
properly credit someone, please let me k
Thanks Erik!
Basically this is where a modular approach is best suited for testing.
You need to think about what you need to test in your "publisher"
program and how you can break it into pieces
BTW, the compiler is not doing much stuff different that that simple
FileNode request. :)
Mik
"Reverted" the removal of the two methods. All should be well now.
I didn't really want to functional test the compiler (for now), I was
just asking if it was a good idea to have the implemenation in the
tests and the implementation in the MXMLJSC be so different. But since
you've clearly thought
You don't need to test anything, I haven't committed them yet.
As far as asking about methods, what I added made sense and should
have made sense to you by them being overridable. I mean;
addLibraries(libraries)
addSourcePath(paths)
Should be pretty clear they were hooks to add sources and S
Those AMD test are local, not yet committed? I cannot test what isn't there...
EdB
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Michael Schmalle
wrote:
> I guess I have to stick my foot in my mouth on this.
>
> I see you didn't actually implement the compiler yet. So I will stand by
> what I just said tha
I haven't changed anything, I was asking IF changing it was a bad idea...
I did however remove those two methods, as they were empty and unused.
Maybe we should comment when we add some types of abstract methods
that is only meant to be overridden. I'm not that familiar with Java,
but I think ther
I guess I have to stick my foot in my mouth on this.
I see you didn't actually implement the compiler yet. So I will stand
by what I just said that changing this is bad so don't do it (future
tense).
But you did clobber a commit I made a day or two ago. This is making
AMD tests I have bro
Hi Erik,
Yes, this was a bad move. The way the TestBase was setup was testing
'unit's of code, thus we are using a simple setup for config and a
simple AST syntax request to get a FileNode.
You need to change it back, what you changed it to is a 'functional'
test. We are not testing funct
I will contact him and see if he wants to donate it.
Thanks
2013/2/12 Avi Kessner
> The code needs to be donated by the owner
> On Feb 12, 2013 4:36 PM, "Ghazi TRIKI" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Why do not add a ToggleSwitch component to the SDK like this one?
> > http://yonaskolb.com/blog/2012/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikko Torniainen updated FLEX-33389:
Attachment: FLEX33389.mxml
Flex-33389.air
Example app and sourcecode. See t
Hi Mike (I guess ;-)),
I was poking around the FalconJx unit tests to set up the testing of
projects (tests made up of more than one (generated) file), and I
noticed that the tests "roll their own" implementation of the
compilation process. It's generally the same, but some differences
exist. Whil
I do that too, but usually only when there is also a getter/setter (it's
probably bad practice, but that's what I do). I also though it could
work to use the "$" for private and protected vars, and leave public
getter/setters unprefixed, but it still wouldn't be obvious that you are
using a pub
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13576823#comment-13576823
]
Carol Frampton commented on FLEX-33389:
---
If you'd like someone to look at this pleas
Oh good. Seems to have been implemented.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flex/sdk/branches/develop/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/components/DataGrid.as
Thanks Carol & Alex.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 12:35 PM
T
Our coding convention is to preface all private vars with _ so you have
_myVar as a private class scopes var and myVar as a method argument or temp
var which only exists in the scope of the function.
On Feb 12, 2013 6:27 PM, "Kevin Newman" wrote:
> This might seem like a minor thing, but I'd love
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Frédéric Leroy updated FLEX-33390:
--
Description:
When embedding an svg asset the compiler gives:
Multiple markers at this line:
-U
OK, I see it now. It just wasn't in the class property summary.
-Alex
On 2/12/13 9:28 AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote:
>
>
> On 2/12/13 11:53 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/12/13 3:21 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>I was updating some of my components and I
The code needs to be donated by the owner
On Feb 12, 2013 4:36 PM, "Ghazi TRIKI" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why do not add a ToggleSwitch component to the SDK like this one?
> http://yonaskolb.com/blog/2012/1/18/flex-toggle-switch-spark-skin.html. It
> can be a more advanced one with multiple states.
>
> G
On 2/12/13 11:53 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>
>On 2/12/13 3:21 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J"
>wrote:
>
>>
>>I was updating some of my components and I noticed my spark DataGrid
>> component still has custom drag n drop support in it. So I took a look
>> through Jira (lots of adobe imports)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Frédéric Leroy updated FLEX-33390:
--
Attachment: flex-33390.zip
Source files to reproduce the issue
> Can't embed S
Frédéric Leroy created FLEX-33390:
-
Summary: Can't embed SVG asset
Key: FLEX-33390
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33390
Project: Apache Flex
Issue Type: Bug
Compone
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13576788#comment-13576788
]
Alex Harui commented on FLEX-33388:
---
Hi Robbyn,
A test case is a complete but small app
Hi,
@Harbs, I don't think any improvement were made to module popups.
@Dave, Yes, I posted a lot of this stuff before I was forced to learn about
licensing. I suppose I should go back and stick Apache licenses in all of
the files, but the posts themselves try to say they are free to use.
On 2/1
On 2/12/13 7:24 AM, "Alexander Doroshko"
wrote:
> Hi,
> Flex debugger (fdb tool) from Apache Flex SDK is not able to debug
> ActionScript workers, the cool feature introduced in Flash Player 11.4
> [1]. Even worse is that connected debugger prevents ActionScript workers
> from executing.
> Ado
I'll make an example with it and see if it's accepted in having it back in to
match the mx:datagrid. Then I can update the spark:datagrid file and submit a
ticket.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 11:54 AM
To: dev@fle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbyn Gerhardt reopened FLEX-33388:
Here a simple example:
var newText:TextArea= new TextArea();
On 2/12/13 3:21 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" wrote:
>
>I was updating some of my components and I noticed my spark DataGrid
> component still has custom drag n drop support in it. So I took a look
> through Jira (lots of adobe imports) and I couldn't find if the code was added
> back in fin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Harui resolved FLEX-33388.
---
Resolution: Incomplete
Please provide a simple test case.
> Add TextFlow to TextArea
Alexander:
> Flex debugger (fdb tool) from Apache Flex SDK is not able to debug
> ActionScript workers, the cool feature introduced in Flash Player 11.4 [1].
> Even worse is that connected debugger prevents ActionScript workers from
> executing.
> Adobe AIR SDK distributions that include Action
Hi Alex,
I'm looking at this code and it's really useful.
Do I need special permission from you to use this in my product?
-Dave
> From: gavha...@gmail.com
> Subject: Module Popups
> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:35:49 +0200
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> Is this blog post still relevant, or is the
This might seem like a minor thing, but I'd love to see a property
shortcut similar to coffee script, so instead of this.whateverProp, it'd
be @whateverProp. I know we can just omit "this." in AS3, but I think
it's actually harder to read that when you come back to a code base
after a few years
One more thing, running the test suite, I found 77 failed tests, 57 related
to the LangPacks/Japanese/tests
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 3:48 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9.1
Hi,
Can you consider my last fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbyn Gerhardt updated FLEX-33388:
---
Environment:
Win 7
Intel(R) Xeon(R) 2.40 GHz
6GB RAM
was:
Win 7
processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R
Yeah Nick,
I thought a link could fit into the Designer & Developer Tools page of the
wiki maybe as well with a screenshot :)
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 4:56 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Interesting stat from
I'd love to host this information on either our Wiki or website too.
-Nick
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Alexander Doroshko <
alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com> wrote:
> Two blog posts would definitely be better than one :)
>
>
> On 12.02.2013 19:37, Avi Kessner wrote:
>
>> A blog post would
Two blog posts would definitely be better than one :)
On 12.02.2013 19:37, Avi Kessner wrote:
A blog post would be great, I was about to make one myself.
A blog post would be great, I was about to make one myself.
brought to you by the letters A, V, and I
and the number 47
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Alexander Doroshko <
alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com> wrote:
> I'm afraid there's not. Looks like I need to make a blog post summarizing
> in
Is this blog post still relevant, or is there an official way to load a module
as a popup?
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui/2007/08/popup_dialogs_as_modules.html
If it's not officially part of Flex, should it be added?
Harbs
Hi,
Flex debugger (fdb tool) from Apache Flex SDK is not able to debug
ActionScript workers, the cool feature introduced in Flash Player 11.4
[1]. Even worse is that connected debugger prevents ActionScript workers
from executing.
Adobe AIR SDK distributions that include ActionScript Compiler 2
I'm afraid there's not. Looks like I need to make a blog post
summarizing info for IntelliJ IDEA newcomers.
On 12.02.2013 19:12, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Very good set of links, is there a page somewhere where those
informations are listed, if it's the case I would like to add it
Hi Alexander,
Very good set of links, is there a page somewhere where those informations
are listed, if it's the case I would like to add it to my favorites.
Thanks,
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Alexander Doroshko
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 3:19 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
S
hi, Justin
So, actually there are differences between the swc files and sources, right?
thanks
Shigeru Nakagaki
2013/2/12 Justin Mclean :
> HI,
>
>> Flex version of frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/core/Version.as
>> is "4.9.0.1425567".
> The version number here includes the SVN revision
Hi,
Can you consider my last five commits ?
When do you plan to launch the release ?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 1:21 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Apache Flex 4.9.1
Hi,
Other than the locale fix is there anything that is need
Sorry, forgot one more important link. Developers familiar with Eclipse
and Eclipse-based products should first of all take a look at the page
'IntelliJ IDEA vs Eclipse Terminology' [1] and keep a link to 'Basic
Concepts' [2].
[1]
http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/webhelp/intellij-idea-vs-eclipse
@Jude ... thanks for sharing this,
Any ideas how to implement the roundtrip of custom SkinnableComponents
with declared [SkinPart] and [SkinState] tags as shown in screenshots
of FlashCatalyst and FlashBuilder [1] and the small LoginExample.fxp
project [2]?
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence
On 2/12/13 4:21 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Other than the locale fix is there anything that is needed for a 4.9.1
> release?
Flex-config might still have a reference to incubator.
AeonGraphical theme missing some assets from 4.6.
I'll try to deal with those today.
--
Alex Harui
F
That info could tip me over to IDEA - was thinking i needed commercial
license but looks like personal is ok for me
On 12/02/2013 13:38, Alexander Doroshko wrote:
Hi,
- ActionScript/Flex support is included in IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate
Edition only [1]
- 30-day free fully functional trial period
I can say It's a very cool start!
On Feb 12, 2013, at 11:03 AM, jude wrote:
> I've kindof been sitting on this for a while but I thought I'd put it out
> there. I'd like to create a design and development tool for designers and
> developers. Usually, you have a really good development tool with a
Hi,
- ActionScript/Flex support is included in IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate
Edition only [1]
- 30-day free fully functional trial period [2]. Afterwards you can ask
sa...@jetbrains.com to extend trial period.
- members of open source projects (e.g. Apache Flex committers) can
apply for a free license
HI,
> Flex version of frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/core/Version.as
> is "4.9.0.1425567".
The version number here includes the SVN revision added to the Apache Flex SDK
version number
Justin
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
