But it does bring up the point of how we are going to organize the page
someday to handle large amounts of entries.
- Maybe the showcase itself could be a Flex app, with tags, ranking/votes ,
comments, etc...
- we could split in mobile / desktop
(just ideas)
Maurice
-Message
I like the flex app idea. The question is what do we have in the way of server
side to handle dynamic data requests and how are we going to store the data
-Mark.
-Original Message-
From: Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 5:58 AM
Ok, so flex app loading an xml list from the server. So the last part is
really about how to organize the data on the server. Folder for each app in
the showcase with a pics and another xml file that has the detail description
with the pic file listing.
-Mark
-Original Message-
I'd rather not get into the comments / rating thing. *.apache.org is a
pretty huge target for spammers and we shouoldn't have to make it
somebody's full time job to scrape all those -- esp. if they are tied to
some business which may then want to leave the showcase because of negative
or spammy
Why not just a simple catalogue?
root
--- items
-- Showcase Item 1
Image
Description
Title
..
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Kessler CTR Mark J
mark.kessler@usmc.mil wrote:
Ok, so flex app loading an xml list from the
This is true. The extra benefit of having the subfolder xml's will be able to
see the hits on each app view using just the website stats we have now.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 7:23 AM
To:
Well I was thinking of not having one large xml root file with everything.
Instead having the app listing with icons and lead in short description. Then
having the large descriptions, pics, url to owner page, app store url if any
stored in the sub-folder ...
-Mark
-Original
Hi,
A few app submissions (eg. 6play
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34005 ) are made by what looks like
developers sub-contracting for another company.
Do you think there is a legal issue to include these apps (eg. the screenshots)
without the permission of the owning company (m6
Hi,
i’m working on this project, and since it’s a public website, i think it’s
absolutly not illegal to display screenshots.
Erick
Le 18 déc. 2013 à 13:34, Maurice Amsellem maurice.amsel...@systar.com a écrit
:
Hi,
A few app submissions (eg. 6play
Thanks, Eric,
But Apache tends to wary about legal stuff, so I prefer to ask for team
advice.
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : rx labz [mailto:rxl...@gmail.com] De la part de Erick Ghaumez
Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 13:39
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Flex Showcase legal
We can ask on legal-discuss if you want to be certain, but I would guess
the answer is yes, we need permission from the owner. But Erick is
probably not wrong about the taking of screenshots either. My thought
experiment is this: If I was hired to paint the outside of a TV studio
with a
Thanks Alex,
I will then include the screenshots and the app in showcase.
We could then withdraw them easily in case someone complains.
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 15:33
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re:
On 12/17/13 11:45 PM, Maurice Amsellem maurice.amsel...@systar.com
wrote:
Well, re-read the end of that thread and let me know where you stand.
Alex wrote:
Another possibility is that we leave the PBK's where they are and simply
add new build targets to flex-sdk build script. That might be
I obviously understand these legal doubts, but IMHO for the use of this 3
screenshots, it will be endless.
What kind of permission can be legal ? Is there a template document somewhere ?
I can ask to the M6Web's CTO ( M6Web is the subsidiary company which is in
charge of digital projects ), but
Another possibility is that we leave the PBK's where they are and simply add
new build targets to flex-sdk build script. That might be simpler and gives
us the option of reverting back to a single package
if we find that we can someday.
Yeah. So what are your thoughts now?
- given that
OK for me.
Also, can you include a small copyright notice in the description, something
like M6, 6Ter, W9 and 6play are registered trademarks of .
thanks
-Message d'origine-
De : rx labz [mailto:rxl...@gmail.com] De la part de Erick Ghaumez
Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 16:01
Maybe we should add them in good faith of being in compliance with the screen
shots and just remove any based on valid take down requests from the owners.
-Mark
Nice!
Harbs
On Dec 17, 2013, at 10:49 PM, Peter Ent wrote:
Hi,
I've added a simple BarChart component to the ActionScript FlexJS SDK; it is
modeled on the MX Charts package. I also included an example of using it,
located in the FlexJS examples directory.
I developed the BarChart in
Maybe we should add them in good faith of being in compliance with the screen
shots and just remove any based on valid take down requests from the owners.
Also what I think. thanks
-Message d'origine-
De : Kessler CTR Mark J [mailto:mark.kessler@usmc.mil]
Envoyé : mercredi 18
IMO, it is not a good idea to violate copyright and trademark law and wait
to see if you get caught, even if the remedy is simple.
If you are a famous celebrity and happen to buy a particular brand of
clothing and someone sees you wearing it in public, folks can probably
tweet and Facebook that
I undestand.
FYI, the app is already included in the showcase, as I read your email after.
Shall I withdraw it temporarily while waiting for the legal stuff to be fixed.?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 17:33
À :
Yes, that would probably be the safe thing to do.
Thanks and sorry for the hassle,
-Alex
On 12/18/13 8:43 AM, Maurice Amsellem maurice.amsel...@systar.com
wrote:
I undestand.
FYI, the app is already included in the showcase, as I read your email
after.
Shall I withdraw it temporarily while
On 12/18/13 7:00 AM, Erick Ghaumez er...@rxlabz.com wrote:
I obviously understand these legal doubts, but IMHO for the use of this 3
screenshots, it will be endless.
What kind of permission can be legal ? Is there a template document
somewhere ?
I can ask to the M6Web's CTO ( M6Web is the
On 12/18/13 6:59 AM, Maurice Amsellem maurice.amsel...@systar.com
wrote:
Another possibility is that we leave the PBK's where they are and
simply add new build targets to flex-sdk build script. That might be
simpler and gives us the option of reverting back to a single package
if we find that
Done. (bot update pending)
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 17:49
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Flex Showcase legal aspects
Yes, that would probably be the safe thing to do.
Thanks and sorry for the hassle,
-Alex
On Dec 18, 2013 9:07 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
On 12/18/13 6:59 AM, Maurice Amsellem maurice.amsel...@systar.com
wrote:
Another possibility is that we leave the PBK's where they are and
simply add new build targets to flex-sdk build script. That might be
simpler and gives us
I had a meeting with the engineer who wrote most of the PB compiler. He says
that the PBK to PBJ pipeline shouldn't have dependencies on the gnu, but other
PBK to XXX pipelines do, so it should be possible to modify the compiler and
get rid of the window dependency.
I believe so, pbutil is
I think it is too much effort for a few shaders. IMO, we should compile the
pbk files and keep the binaries around till there is a need to change them.
Pretty much what you have been doing for the past few days :-)
That pretty much my position, in more elegant and concise terms ;-)
Le 18 déc. 2013 à 17:45, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com a écrit :
On 12/18/13 7:00 AM, Erick Ghaumez er...@rxlabz.com wrote:
I obviously understand these legal doubts, but IMHO for the use of this 3
screenshots, it will be endless.
What kind of permission can be legal ? Is there a template
On 12/18/13 12:22 PM, Erick Ghaumez er...@rxlabz.com wrote:
As I¹ve said, the owner is « big » TV group, my contract is with a
subsidiary company in charge of digital projects. I don¹t know if the one
who signs my contract is legally authorized to give this permission. But
if I understand, if he
Within the USA, if you do work-for-hire, the IP rights and everything
associated with it generally go to employer. That is, unless you expressly
reserve those rights.
Every country is different. Some of my customers are happy to have me tell
their story -- others don't want people to know who
On 12/18/13 9:48 AM, Maurice Amsellem maurice.amsel...@systar.com
wrote:
Well, I am making it a separate package. The question is whether you
think we should also move this code out of the flex-sdk repo.
What does separate package inside the flex-sdk mean?
is that a distinct and autonomous
Hi,
Doing #1 appears to be the least work, but if you are going to veto the
release then I need to find some other configuration that will make you
happy.
Releases can't be vetoed. They require 3+1's and more +1 than -1's. But the PMC
does have a responsibility to the board that the release
Hi,
Under US law there is also a fair use provision, which the showcase would
probably come under (and permission is not required), but it IMO always best to
ask.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
Looks like the confluence upgrade has broken some of the styling:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Guidelines
Anyone have an idea of what needs to be fixed? I'd guess the images are just
missing?
Thanks,
Justin
Same in France : rights goes to the employer, IP depends, and you have the
rights to use small quotations (I guess that's what you call fair use
provision) without permission.
There is another issue here:
If you look at the screenshots, there don't only show tv channels logos (which
belong to
Maybe i can blur all the logos and pictures in screenshots, and maybe the title
can only talk about a « anonymous » French Social TV application ?
Erick
Le 18 déc. 2013 à 23:23, Maurice Amsellem maurice.amsel...@systar.com a écrit
:
Same in France : rights goes to the employer, IP depends,
On 12/18/13 2:12 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Doing #1 appears to be the least work, but if you are going to veto the
release then I need to find some other configuration that will make you
happy.
Releases can't be vetoed. They require 3+1's and more +1 than -1's.
Justin is right, anyway I didn't have the intention to veto the release ;-)
First of all, thanks Alex for the consideration you give to my position, given
that I am a newcomer to the team.
If you think that #1 (leave the files in place) is good solution, then go for
it.
I just would look to
Wow. I hate blurred images, especially when it's for legal reasons, and I think
I will not do justice to the really nice app you made.
But that's only a personal view.
I really don't know what needs to be done.
Maybe you should ask the person you know at M6 (CTO ?) like what was suggested.
Hi,
Right now, I'm thinking of:
1) adding a pixelbender.xml file with a main target that does the compile,
a clean target that deletes the PBJ and a copy target that copies the PBJs
into place in the sdk tree.
2) add more to the release notes that point you to this xml file
3) Separate
Sorry Alex, I missed you proposition in the last email (this interleaved
multithreaded discussions are a real pain...)
Right now, I'm thinking of:
1) adding a pixelbender.xml file with a main target that does the
compile, a clean target that deletes the PBJ and a copy target that
copies
Peter
Awesome, there's a particular post I wrote last week about writing from
ground up charts in canvas and javascript. You can use google translate for
that http://www.igorcosta.com/criando-graficos-zero-com-canvas-e-javascript/
Maybe help for next couple of charts.
We are very close to having a second VM up and running Mustella. Can
someone help take a look at these errors?
Almost all of them are timeout errors even after running a second time.
Should we just run everything again and hope to see them go away?
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:15 PM,
Fair Use is pretty limited in the USA, and is usually regarded in terms of
education or personal use. Advertisement is generally not allowed under
fair-use but again, that is something for the legal-beagles to
determine ;)
-Nick
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Justin Mclean
To counter your point about commercial use never being fair use:; I'll
quote TechDirt (
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20131125/10182325360/beastie-boys-say-they-dont-want-music-ads-fair-use-doesnt-care.shtml
) quoting a Supreme Court ruling (
On 12/18/13 2:47 PM, Maurice Amsellem maurice.amsel...@systar.com
wrote:
Wow. I hate blurred images, especially when it's for legal reasons, and I
think I will not do justice to the really nice app you made.
But that's only a personal view.
I really don't know what needs to be done.
Maybe you
On 12/18/13 3:08 PM, Maurice Amsellem maurice.amsel...@systar.com
wrote:
Sorry Alex, I missed you proposition in the last email (this interleaved
multithreaded discussions are a real pain...)
Right now, I'm thinking of:
1) adding a pixelbender.xml file with a main target that does the
Looks like there is no HTTP server for localhost:80 or localhost:8080?
On 12/18/13 5:14 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
We are very close to having a second VM up and running Mustella. Can
someone help take a look at these errors?
Almost all of them are timeout errors even
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Looks like there is no HTTP server for localhost:80 or localhost:8080?
There is a httpd server on localhost (on port 80) which points to
mustella/tests
Also, localhost:8080 is jenkins.
This is how Erik's VM is set up as
If you open a browser and hit localhost, does it show you the mustella
files? Can you click on a SWF in the MarshallPlan folder and get it to
run?
I have to change two setting in https.conf, the DocumentRoot and Directory
tag both have the path to mustella/tests.
-Alex
On 12/18/13 11:17 PM,
51 matches
Mail list logo
