Hi,
> + var link:String = compLibTree.selectedItem.@link;
May need to check if link attribute exists otherwise may run issues around the
property not existing vs having an empty value.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
Given we're now embedding an image from another site are there security
concerns around that?
I think the disclaimer on the same page covers any legal issues. Anyone think
otherwise?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> I've checked in the changes into the apache-tour-de-flex-1.2 branch. Can
> someone take a look at the changes?
From a quick glance the changes look OK to me.
> The new version is (should be) available here. You will need to clear your
> browser cache first:
> http://apacheflexbuild.cloud
Hi,
> Sometimes, releases get stuck on hard issues discovered late in the game.
> It is clear you want to ship as-is, but I think we should make the
> third-party content look good.
I'd like to remind people that releases cannot be vetoed and votes on releases
are by majority approval (ie 3+1 vo
I've checked in the changes into the apache-tour-de-flex-1.2 branch. Can
someone take a look at the changes?
I have kicked off a build here:
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-utilities_tour-de-flex-release/10/console
The new version is (should be) available here. You will need t
Hi,
> I tried building the TourDeFlex with the
> nightly build from earlier in the thread but I was hit with 100 or so
> compile errors with path errors and pointers to non-existent components
> like a Spark RichTextEditor
Just in case anyone runs into this issue you need the latest released ver
How's this?
link: http://www.ardisialabs.com/tourDeFlex/tour-de-flex.jpg
Image is also attached.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:43 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> Thanks Jake. I linked to the image url you and tested the app. It looks
> too tiny. It is a 400x400 image. We probably need a 800x8
Thanks Jake. I linked to the image url you and tested the app. It looks
too tiny. It is a 400x400 image. We probably need a 800x800 for it to
look nice and readable. Also, a line of text in the image would probably
work.
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Jake Knerr wrote:
> Hi OmP
(CC-ing Flexicious and Jake@Ardisia)
I have a fix ready to be checked in that uses an image and a click event to
take the user to a third party demo page. From my FB debug console, I
don't see any securitydomain exceptions when I do this. Whereas, with
loading a swf, I get a securitydomain error
Hi,
I am one of the third-parties, the "Ardisia Component Library". Sorry
about not responding earlier, I just read the thread.
I am thrilled to be included in the Tour De Flex, so first off thanks for
including this new feature. I tried building the TourDeFlex with the
nightly build from earlie
Hi,
I am one of the third-parties, the "Ardisia Component Library". Sorry
about not responding earlier, I just read the thread.
I am thrilled to be included in the Tour De Flex, so first off thanks for
including this new feature. I tried building the TourDeFlex with the
nightly build from earlie
On 11/7/14, 12:34 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>So how do we reach consensus on this in a timely way? If the process
>doesn't allow a vote and/or people don't vote it's basically dead in the
>water. I would like to see this released sooner than later and not have
>releases hanging for weeks, not
We have had
if (_curElementStart == _curParaStart+_curParaElement.textLength)
break;
get off before because we accidentally edited the model during composition.
TLF really hates when you do that.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:50 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> No, please go ahead, I think showing pro
I've relocated it near to the top left.
I notice each subsequent run however the new window moves down and
right, because of the cascade window placement Windows uses.
What I think of as 'normal' sized Player windows do now always stay in
the screen, without going behind the start bar or anyt
>
> As the release manager I think it is a minor issue but let's hear from
>> other people.
>>
> Me too, but others feel stronger. Surely we can just replace with a link
> to the web site for now easily enough ?
>
> There's no rush to get this out right now as far as I can tell, so if no
> one gets
On 07/11/14 08:34, Justin Mclean wrote:
As the release manager I think it is a minor issue but let's hear from other
people.
Me too, but others feel stronger. Surely we can just replace with a link
to the web site for now easily enough ?
There's no rush to get this out right now as far as I c
No, please go ahead, I think showing progress and thoughts/ideas will be
helpful to others, and it might even trigger someone with a solution.
EdB
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Harbs wrote:
> A bit more progress: It looks like things go off where the text flows from
> one container into ano
Hi,
> I think removing 3rdparty.xml and updating the RELEASE_NOTES would be
> sufficient.
But then the release notes would not reflect what has actually been added in
the source release which is what they need to represent. OR are you suggesting
we have different release notes for the binary an
A bit more progress: It looks like things go off where the text flows from one
container into another mid-paragraph…
(Sorry for polluting the mailing list with this. I’ll try to be quiet until I
figure it out…)
On Nov 7, 2014, at 9:55 AM, Harbs wrote:
> It’s pretty big.
>
> It consistently g
As it currently stands I would vote for #3 of the proposed list of choices.
Leaning more to hide than remove. Simply in the interests of pushing out a
release and allowing users to actually get a chance to use the updated
version of TDF. There is clearly a demand for it amongst users. It would be
n
20 matches
Mail list logo
