Hi,
Having the word apache in the logo is likely to help with branding and
trademarks. See for example Apache Hadoop [1], Apache Spark [2], Apache Kafka
[3] (and there are others as well i.e. cordova, storm, ant, solr, open office,
geode + others and of course the http project).
Apache Spark
Wow! So this is so exciting. Mosting trending subject currently. What a
'royale' start ; )
I'm not sure if domain name is fixed yet. If not, may be just like how a
voting thread was opened for finalising the name, same can be done for
finalising domain name too. This would narrow down the search.
Hi -
It is not a requirement. I was curious. Having it might help the brand.
Certainly the website design will need Apache branding. (Not all project are
fully in compliance with brand policy, but we try.)
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 24, 2017, at 8:02 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
Hi Dave,
Is having "Apache" in the logo a requirement? I'm not convinced every
other Apache project is doing that (or incorporating the feather either).
We do need the "TM" in the logo though.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 9/24/17, 2:35 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
>It's pretty cool. I like the path overlays
I really like it. Is it possible to see this with the Apache Flex logo
colors? The colors could provide a continuity for the two project names.
Great work, Carlos!
Thanks,
Om
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Carlos Rovira
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been working this week end on a logo for Royale
My first thought is positive. I like the font and the spacing. But,
if you want a more nitpicky answer...
A project [or brand] wants to be seen as going upward to greater
heights. Generally this is communicated by pointing up and/or to the
right. Fedex and Amazon are two prominent logo
It's pretty cool. I like the path overlays - it made me think of the Olympic
logo.
Since the project is Apache Royale how would the word Apache be incorporated as
a logotype?
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 24, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been workin
Hi,
I've been working this week end on a logo for Royale and want to share my
work in progress. Please try the following link:
http://royale.codeoscopic.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/royale_logo.png
The concept is a modern icon logo build with simplicity in mind and with
lines and circles that
Carlos,
So excited once you are finish! So excited about all the ideas guys. :)
We can create thread about 1.0 on new mailing list and we should mention
our conversation on FlexJS Summit [1]. There are some points and jiras
raised which they are still true in the Royale. They even should be moved
I don’t see why it can’t be some of both.
Personally, I think it would be really cool to use travis-ci to automatically
generate parts or all of our website in [FlexJS].
Josh has already managed to use travis-ci for some of his stuff.
Even if we are dogfooding our content, we would still probab
Hi PKumar,
I try a custom class object (I uploaded a Product example). That worked for
me, I think it has a String and a int or something like that. Did you try
that?
I didn't try more complex inheritance, but that is crucial to make RO be
used in real production cases.
As I'm this days working o
Hi Harbs,
you're right, I can work faster in WP but after I get a production state we
then can think about creating a state site with the results (there are
tools for that, even to migrate to Jekyll although I don't test it). My
beet is that we can export statics versions to host in gihub, I never
>
> [...] I’d definitely like to see if we could migrate the content
> afterwards.
>
Dogfooding. Yeah!
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Harbs,
So you will be all for migrating content from website to gh pages not using
Royale instead, as Yishay suggest? That is what you mean?
Piotr
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017, 14:37 Harbs wrote:
> I’m still not sure what you mean. From my perspective, WordPress is ideal
> for dynamic websites. For st
I’m still not sure what you mean. From my perspective, WordPress is ideal for
dynamic websites. For static websites, it’s really just the HTML and CSS doing
the magic and the platform really doesn’t make a difference.
There’s lots of OSS projects which use Github Pages for really nice sites.
If
Olaf Krueger wrote
> I think FlexJS/Royale is bloated for building Websites.
I think this could make for an interesting technical discussion. Why is
Royale bloated for building Websites?
--
Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/
Harbs,
I believe you do not have to much ready to use layouts for github pages. I
saw them and they are not so sophisticated.
Carlos probably creat much faster beautiful website. For documentation GH
pages are nice.
Try to explore it and you will see. Of course I will go with the flow if
others
Github all the way!
EdB
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
> +1 to Github, since that will make external people more easy to fix
> something.
>
> 2017-09-24 8:51 GMT+02:00 Harbs :
>
> > OK. Let’s see if we can do everything with Github, Worse
I’m not understanding. What does WordPress do that Github Pages can’t?
Harbs
> On Sep 24, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Piotr Zarzycki
> wrote:
>
> Hi Harbs,
>
> Github pages are really simple. We can use it for display documentation.
> Hopefully take it this initially started by Olaf.
>
> Piotr
>
> O
Hi Yishay,
I agree with you, but creation of that site take a lot of time cause we are
volunteer. Personally I would start the idea once Carlos put all his design
and create WP website. Than we can slowly start recreation using his design
in order to replace WP some day.
Piotr
On Sun, Sep 24, 20
Personally I think it should be a FlexJS App/Site. It would take longer to have
something running but if the framework isn’t ready for this kind of thing then
it’s probably a good idea to delay publishing the site until it is ready.
Frankly, I don’t think we’re in a Royale state right now. There
Carlos,
I tested it with most of built in data type( Including Vector) and it is
working ok, but I can not send or receive following type:
ArrayList - send & receive not working
Custom Class Object - nor able to send it , getting exception at BlazeDs
side.
Complex Object with Inheritance
Hi Harbs,
Github pages are really simple. We can use it for display documentation.
Hopefully take it this initially started by Olaf.
Piotr
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017, 09:37 Harbs wrote:
> I’m late to this party, but what’s the advantage of using WordPress for
> the site? Wouldn’t Github Pages be mor
I’m late to this party, but what’s the advantage of using WordPress for the
site? Wouldn’t Github Pages be more appropriate? That would allow pull requests
for folks to improve the site.
Thanks,
Harbs
> On Sep 23, 2017, at 10:27 AM, Carlos Rovira
> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex, an apache VM with WP wi
+1 to Github, since that will make external people more easy to fix
something.
2017-09-24 8:51 GMT+02:00 Harbs :
> OK. Let’s see if we can do everything with Github, Worse comes to worst,
> we can always requests JIRA later.
>
> > On Sep 24, 2017, at 9:40 AM, Alex Harui
> wrote:
> >
> > I think
Thanks for filling the spot!
Harbs
> On Sep 22, 2017, at 5:04 PM, Tom Chiverton wrote:
>
> Thanks everyone.
>
> Filling in a report every few months is not much "premier" :-)
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 21/09/17 22:07, Carlos Rovira wrote:
>> Congrats Tom!
>>
>> Thanks again for taking the position a
26 matches
Mail list logo
