Re: Royale website and domain registration

Wow! So this is so exciting. Mosting trending subject currently. What a 'royale' start ; ) I'm not sure if domain name is fixed yet. If not, may be just like how a voting thread was opened for finalising the name, same can be done for finalising domain name too. This would narrow down the search.

Re: Royale Logo

Hi - It is not a requirement. I was curious. Having it might help the brand. Certainly the website design will need Apache branding. (Not all project are fully in compliance with brand policy, but we try.) Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 24, 2017, at 8:02 PM, Alex Harui

Re: Royale Logo

Hi Dave, Is having "Apache" in the logo a requirement? I'm not convinced every other Apache project is doing that (or incorporating the feather either). We do need the "TM" in the logo though. Thanks, -Alex On 9/24/17, 2:35 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote: >It's pretty cool.

Re: Royale Logo

 My first thought is positive.  I like the font and the spacing. But, if you want a more nitpicky answer...  A project [or brand] wants to be seen as going upward to greater heights.  Generally this is communicated by pointing up and/or to the right.  Fedex and Amazon are two prominent logo

Re: Royale Logo

It's pretty cool. I like the path overlays - it made me think of the Olympic logo. Since the project is Apache Royale how would the word Apache be incorporated as a logotype? Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 24, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > >

Re: Royale website and domain registration

Carlos, So excited once you are finish! So excited about all the ideas guys. :) We can create thread about 1.0 on new mailing list and we should mention our conversation on FlexJS Summit [1]. There are some points and jiras raised which they are still true in the Royale. They even should be

Re: Royale website and domain registration

I don’t see why it can’t be some of both. Personally, I think it would be really cool to use travis-ci to automatically generate parts or all of our website in [FlexJS]. Josh has already managed to use travis-ci for some of his stuff. Even if we are dogfooding our content, we would still

Re: [FlexJS, AMF] Steps to make FlexJS / Java - RemoteObject / AMF sample work

Hi PKumar, I try a custom class object (I uploaded a Product example). That worked for me, I think it has a String and a int or something like that. Did you try that? I didn't try more complex inheritance, but that is crucial to make RO be used in real production cases. As I'm this days working

Re: Royale website and domain registration

Hi Harbs, you're right, I can work faster in WP but after I get a production state we then can think about creating a state site with the results (there are tools for that, even to migrate to Jekyll although I don't test it). My beet is that we can export statics versions to host in gihub, I

Re: Royale website and domain registration

Harbs, So you will be all for migrating content from website to gh pages not using Royale instead, as Yishay suggest? That is what you mean? Piotr On Sun, Sep 24, 2017, 14:37 Harbs wrote: > I’m still not sure what you mean. From my perspective, WordPress is ideal > for

Re: Royale website and domain registration

I’m still not sure what you mean. From my perspective, WordPress is ideal for dynamic websites. For static websites, it’s really just the HTML and CSS doing the magic and the platform really doesn’t make a difference. There’s lots of OSS projects which use Github Pages for really nice sites.

RE: Royale website and domain registration

Olaf Krueger wrote > I think FlexJS/Royale is bloated for building Websites. I think this could make for an interesting technical discussion. Why is Royale bloated for building Websites? -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Royale website and domain registration

Harbs, I believe you do not have to much ready to use layouts for github pages. I saw them and they are not so sophisticated. Carlos probably creat much faster beautiful website. For documentation GH pages are nice. Try to explore it and you will see. Of course I will go with the flow if

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

Github all the way! EdB On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Carlos Rovira < carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: > +1 to Github, since that will make external people more easy to fix > something. > > 2017-09-24 8:51 GMT+02:00 Harbs : > > > OK. Let’s see if we can do

Re: Royale website and domain registration

I’m not understanding. What does WordPress do that Github Pages can’t? Harbs > On Sep 24, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Piotr Zarzycki > wrote: > > Hi Harbs, > > Github pages are really simple. We can use it for display documentation. > Hopefully take it this initially

Re: Royale website and domain registration

Hi Yishay, I agree with you, but creation of that site take a lot of time cause we are volunteer. Personally I would start the idea once Carlos put all his design and create WP website. Than we can slowly start recreation using his design in order to replace WP some day. Piotr On Sun, Sep 24,

RE: Royale website and domain registration

Personally I think it should be a FlexJS App/Site. It would take longer to have something running but if the framework isn’t ready for this kind of thing then it’s probably a good idea to delay publishing the site until it is ready. Frankly, I don’t think we’re in a Royale state right now.

Re: [FlexJS, AMF] Steps to make FlexJS / Java - RemoteObject / AMF sample work

Carlos, I tested it with most of built in data type( Including Vector) and it is working ok, but I can not send or receive following type: ArrayList - send & receive not working Custom Class Object - nor able to send it , getting exception at BlazeDs side. Complex Object with

Re: Royale website and domain registration

Hi Harbs, Github pages are really simple. We can use it for display documentation. Hopefully take it this initially started by Olaf. Piotr On Sun, Sep 24, 2017, 09:37 Harbs wrote: > I’m late to this party, but what’s the advantage of using WordPress for > the site?

Re: Royale website and domain registration

I’m late to this party, but what’s the advantage of using WordPress for the site? Wouldn’t Github Pages be more appropriate? That would allow pull requests for folks to improve the site. Thanks, Harbs > On Sep 23, 2017, at 10:27 AM, Carlos Rovira > wrote: > >

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

+1 to Github, since that will make external people more easy to fix something. 2017-09-24 8:51 GMT+02:00 Harbs : > OK. Let’s see if we can do everything with Github, Worse comes to worst, > we can always requests JIRA later. > > > On Sep 24, 2017, at 9:40 AM, Alex Harui

Re: Welcome Tom Chiverton as new Apache Flex PMC Chair

Thanks for filling the spot! Harbs > On Sep 22, 2017, at 5:04 PM, Tom Chiverton wrote: > > Thanks everyone. > > Filling in a report every few months is not much "premier" :-) > > Tom > > > On 21/09/17 22:07, Carlos Rovira wrote: >> Congrats Tom! >> >> Thanks again

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

OK. Let’s see if we can do everything with Github, Worse comes to worst, we can always requests JIRA later. > On Sep 24, 2017, at 9:40 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > I think we can request more GitBox/GitHub repos if we want. > > https://gitbox.apache.org

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

I think we can request more GitBox/GitHub repos if we want. https://gitbox.apache.org -Alex On 9/23/17, 11:29 PM, "Harbs" wrote: >We should probably ask INFRA if an extra Github repo for general issues >is an option. > >> On Sep 24, 2017, at 9:20 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

We should probably ask INFRA if an extra Github repo for general issues is an option. > On Sep 24, 2017, at 9:20 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Harbs wrote: > >> In principle, I agree with Om. >> >> The only

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Harbs wrote: > In principle, I agree with Om. > > The only reason I can think of to use JIRA is if there’s some reason to > track issues not related to a specific repo. JIRA would give us a place to > log those kinds of issues. > > Is

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

In principle, I agree with Om. The only reason I can think of to use JIRA is if there’s some reason to track issues not related to a specific repo. JIRA would give us a place to log those kinds of issues. Is there anything like that that folks can think of? Is there some way to use Github