Well, that's a bit disappointing, if not entirely surprising given you
previous statements.
I'll see what I can do about MXML support, but that's going to be a
major thing for me, so it'll take time.
Just curious: how many developers need to work on FalconXX/ASJS for
you to change your mind? Curr
Hey,
No, I can't do MXML, it's not in my current project scope and I don't
have enough time in the day. I kept saying that business logic was my
goal of the project (falconjx), I stubbed in MXML in *my approach* so
there is a solution. It's just a process of traversing the DOM of the
MXML
Alex,
I played around with MXML in FalconJx a bit. There is already
rudimentary support implemented. From my quick glance it looks like we
need Mike for this, as he set the wheels in motion and is most
familiar with the approach chosen for FalconJx::MXML. Mike has
indicated that he is currently wo
Falcons already called closure compiler. I just moved where it was called and
got it to handle multiple files.
We need to get jx to handle mxml in order to switch. Do you have time for that?
I want to get basic css working and do some as refactoring first.
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&
Alex,
>From your latest commit, it looks like we're doing a lot of work
twice. I finished the inclusion of the GCC (incl. deps etc.) into
FalconJx a couple of weeks ago.
I have some cycles open in the near future. What do you think, time to
move FlexJS from FalconJS to FalconJx?
EdB
--
Ix Mu
