On 12/27/16, 10:51 PM, "Yishay Weiss" wrote:
>Nice stuff, Chris.
>
>
>
>All the bugs in the framework seem to be about failing to override the
>clone() method in Event. If I understand correctly, this is mainly to
>preserve state in case an event is re-dispatched. Is
ahead and fix these bugs?
From: Christofer Dutz<mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2016 9:50 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [FlexJS] ASF SonarQube available (Beta-Testing)
Ok … stats are online:
Compiler: https://build
Thanks Chris for the effort on making this! :)
2016-12-27 20:50 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz :
> Ok … stats are online:
>
> Compiler: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/dashboard/index/2461
> Typedefs: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/dashboard/index/20905
> Framework:
Ok … stats are online:
Compiler: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/dashboard/index/2461
Typedefs: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/dashboard/index/20905
Framework: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/dashboard/index/20942
Happy reading,
Chris
Am 27.12.16, 09:02 schrieb "Alex Harui"
On 12/26/16, 11:50 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>I suspect that a big chunk of the duplicate code is related to the Basic
>and HTML projects. As I understand it, HTML was forked from Basic to try a
>different architecture approach, but a big portion of the code is still
>the
I suspect that a big chunk of the duplicate code is related to the Basic
and HTML projects. As I understand it, HTML was forked from Basic to try a
different architecture approach, but a big portion of the code is still the
same.
- Josh
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Christofer Dutz
Thanks Chris. :) That's what I was intrested how much code duplication we
have. :)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASF-SonarQube-available-Beta-Testing-tp57320p57572.html
Sent
Ok … so the results aren’t that bad at all …
Typedefs:
1 Bug
1 Vulnerability
308 Code Smells
Framework:
17 Bugs
86 Vulnerabilities
8500 Code Smells (A lot is probably related to the conditional compilation)
35% of duplicated code
35% of duplicated code seems to indicate we could reuse quite a
Thank you. Looking forward to the results.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASF-SonarQube-available-Beta-Testing-tp57320p57570.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing
I’ll set this up locally and give it a spin. I wouldn’t be surprised, if the
result would be “catastrophic” because of all of the conditional compilation …
I know that sonar doesn’t like this. So I’ll try to setup a build and settings
for ActionScript on my local SonarQube first.
Chris
Am
Chris,
I think it's worth to try with putting into analysis also ActionScript code.
Who should we eventually ask for installing ActionScript plugin?
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
Yup ... currently only C#, Java and JavaScript rules are installed.
Chris
Am 19.12.16, 10:26 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" :
Well In general it would be possible. SonarQube generally is able to scan
ActionScript ...
I didn’t add anything, because I would bet
Well In general it would be possible. SonarQube generally is able to scan
ActionScript ...
I didn’t add anything, because I would bet a lot on the fact that the results
would be so bad that we can’t do much with it. Because of all the huge amount
of conditional compilation, which is regarded
Hi Chris,
Do you think that would be possible run anlysis also for ActionScript part
of framework?
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
Ok ... so now I brought in all the Maven built parts:
SDK Converter aka Mavnizer: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/overview?id=14055
BlazeDS: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/overview?id=11879
FlexJS: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/overview?id=2461
Chris
Am 16.12.16, 19:23 schrieb
Nice!
On 12/16/16, 4:03 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>Wow! That's dawn cool! :))
>
>2016-12-16 12:57 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz :
>
>> Ok ..
>>
>> so we managed to
Wow! That's dawn cool! :))
2016-12-16 12:57 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz :
> Ok ..
>
> so we managed to get the analyis running from Maven (includes code
> coverage)
> The link to this is:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/analysis/overview?id=2461
>
> Chris
>
> Am 16.12.16,
Ok ..
so we managed to get the analyis running from Maven (includes code coverage)
The link to this is:
https://builds.apache.org/analysis/overview?id=2461
Chris
Am 16.12.16, 11:48 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" :
Hi,
even if not officially communicated
18 matches
Mail list logo