On 3/15/14 9:59 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
1) Justin voted -1 and listed several issues. I'm still looking for
enough information to try to reproduce Error: Inconsistant linkage in
/Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlexDevelopGit/frameworks/libs/air/ai
rg
On 3/15/14 11:05 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Yeah, I didn't see you add it, but by luck I just happened to notice
there
is at least one copy in there. That means work for the build script as
it
will have to download SWFObject and copy it into all of those places.
On 3/15/14 10:51 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
I think if they are still lurking you have already gotten their
attention.
If they are not listening at all, this won't help. I'm not clear a
signature from the PMC will be a difference maker.
I wasn't going to send the
Hi,
I see. Well, it sounds like a few PMC members are uncomfortable with it
being signed by the PMC.
One so far yes but that's the only objection so far. I'd put it to a vote with
a veto before sending out but would like to see what other people think first.
Thanks,
Justin
On 3/15/14 11:22 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
I see. Well, it sounds like a few PMC members are uncomfortable with it
being signed by the PMC.
One so far yes but that's the only objection so far. I'd put it to a vote
with a veto before sending out but would like to
Hi,
IMO, swfobject must be removed from the repo. I don't think the folks who
signed the SGA had the right to donate SWFObject.
If the file contains the correct licence (ie MIT) is that still an issue? With
MIT licences file you are allowed to redistribute the files as long as you
leave the
On Mar 15, 2014 11:11 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
On 3/15/14 9:59 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
1) Justin voted -1 and listed several issues. I'm still looking for
enough information to try to reproduce Error: Inconsistant linkage in
On 3/15/14 11:45 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
IMO, swfobject must be removed from the repo. I don't think the folks
who
signed the SGA had the right to donate SWFObject.
If the file contains the correct licence (ie MIT) is that still an issue?
With MIT licences
I'm with Om. Call 3.0.
Any issues (incorrectly) building from source will probably not happen that
often in the wild, as this is realistically speaking a utility for which
even devs will download the binaries.
EdB
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 7:49 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
bigosma...@gmail.comwrote:
Let's not discuss this to death, please.
I very much like Justin's proposal. I think that he can sign on behalf of
the PMC, as it is one of the PMC's duties to try to get as much people to
contribute to the project as possible. As a PMC member you can't be against
an effort to get people to
Hi,
Any issues (incorrectly) building from source will probably not happen that
often in the wild, as this is realistically speaking a utility for which
even devs will download the binaries.
Official Apache releases are source only, the binaries are just a connivence
nothing more.
Justin
Hi,
We've been conservative and don't put things in our repo that haven't been
donated regardless of license.
OK so is the solution to delete those files from the repo? Currently they have
no effect on the release packages.
We went over these on September 13-15 in a thread called FlexUnit
Hi,
Do you have a reference for that number? I'm not in the US, and I didn't
see the issue...
80+% of people who install the SDK are outside of the US and who may use an
locale other than en_US. I guess some would use en_US but a lot wouldn't -
either way that's a significant amount of users.
Hi,
Sorry if it's inconvenient but as per Apache guidelines votes are on source
releases not binaries and as PMC members we need to abide by that.
Justin
Is it a problem with the Installer or with SDK 4.12?
This is really Alex's call at this point. He has the votes to make the
release happen.
Thanks,
Om
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.comwrote:
Hi,
Do you have a reference for that number? I'm not in
Hi,
Is it a problem with the Installer or with SDK 4.12?
It's a problem with the installer ant file in the 4.12 released SDK I believe.
Lok like ALex may of just corrected the issue.
This is really Alex's call at this point.
Or people who voted +1 can look into the issue and decide to change
I'm not sure what is not moral about it.
I agree, it's not the right word (I am not native English speaker).
Still think it's inaccurate and unfair, as all methods that claim to measure
human performance/activity or whatever...
Maybe that's in the French culture, and people in the US are used
Is it a problem with the Installer or with SDK 4.12?
It's a problem with the installer ant file in the 4.12 released SDK I
believe. Lok like ALex may of just corrected the issue.
So, this issue can apparently be fixed by a new SDK release, not a new
Installer RC. If I understand that
Did you install the Flex-compatible AIR SDK?
I installed it from this page:
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/air/air-sdk-download.html
(AIRSDK_Compiler.zip)
So I will use the standalone one from:
http://airdownload.adobe.com/air/win/download/4.0/AdobeAIRSDK.zip
(url from installer config file).
Hi,
So, this issue can apparently be fixed by a new SDK release, not a new
Installer RC. If I understand that correctly, there is no reason to veto
the Installer release because of an SDK issue that happened to come to
light when testing the Installer.
IMO there is - the ant script is really
IIUC, installer 3.0 is good enough, but the installer.xml file in the 4.12
release SDK is not good.
So IMO, we shouldn't make a release now, because in this case, installer 3.0
will replace 2.7 as the default installer page (installer.html).
So people who install Flex using the official
On 3/15/2014 9:13 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
What changes do you think are required for it to sent from the PMC?
Thanks, Justin
I do not think the PMC--as a group--should be sending out emails like
the one you posted.
--
Jeffry Houser
Technical Entrepreneur
http://www.jeffryhouser.com
As a lurker, I will just say that it's still rather scary to make an
official JIRA, or patch, or whatever the process is. The bureaucracy itself
is rather scary to be honest.
brought to you by the letters A, V, and I
and the number 47
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Jeffry Houser
On 3/16/2014 3:37 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
it is one of the PMC's duties to try to get as much people to
contribute to the project as possible.
Are you sure?
I do not see that listed anywhere in Apache's PMC Guidelines:
https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html
--
Jeffry Houser
Technical
it is one of the PMC's duties to try to get as much people to
contribute to the project as possible.
Are you sure?
I do not see that listed anywhere in Apache's PMC Guidelines:
https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html
You are kidding, right? If proper management and oversight doesn't at
Hi,
I do not think the PMC--as a group--should be sending out emails like the one
you posted.
Can expand on why? Email private@ or me off list if you feel for some reason it
shouldn't be discussed on this list.
Thanks,
Justin
On 3/16/2014 9:41 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
I do not think the PMC--as a group--should be sending out emails like the one
you posted.
Can expand on why? Email private@ or me off list if you feel for some reason it
shouldn't be discussed on this list.
I'm not sure what to expand upon
On 3/16/14 12:44 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
We've been conservative and don't put things in our repo that haven't
been
donated regardless of license.
OK so is the solution to delete those files from the repo? Currently they
have no effect on the release packages.
I see your point.
So maybe we should remove the first sentence we have noticed you have been
doing nothing for a while
And maybe simply describe the situation and ask if people are still interested
in the project, and the areas where help is needed.
Also, I think it's important, as Justin
On 3/16/14 2:53 AM, Maurice Amsellem maurice.amsel...@systar.com wrote:
IIUC, installer 3.0 is good enough, but the installer.xml file in the
4.12 release SDK is not good.
So IMO, we shouldn't make a release now, because in this case, installer
3.0 will replace 2.7 as the default installer
Please try it yourself.
Ok, but I couldn't find in this thread a detaild description of the issue.
Could you please point me to the exact mail, and if none, describe what needs
to be tested.
I have to defer to the non-en_US folks on these matters. One question: do
all of your projects set
On 3/16/2014 10:23 AM, Maurice Amsellem wrote:
I see your point.
Thanks!
Maybe we should send to ALL committers, so that no-one feels uncomfortable
with that.
I thought it was the original intent to send to all committers.
WDYT?
I don't understand why the email needs to be sent at
Mike, I'm pretty sure in past threads I've asked you to work with Infra
directly by filing a JIRA. Can you do that? I think it would go more
smoothly if you worked directly with them.
Please feel free to send me that thread. I was fairly certain you were
discussing this with infra.
I know
Labriola or some other FlexUnit expert can tell us if they are for
required features?
I will do my best to monitor this thread. I think all relevant issues have been
discussed in threads before but, if for any reason, you are waiting on a
response here from me or need technical info and
Just another note from the security side of this. Some people don't put
their name / pictures on lists because sometimes they end up good methods
to support stalkers or disgruntled people and yes I've seen it happen
before.
Luckily we do have a decentralized group of people without office
Everyone's workload ebbs and flows. Sending out nagging messages isn't
going to help that. However a message that gets sent out with just
positive updates / messages I'm fine.
-Mark
I personally know tons of old Flex developers that for all intensive
purposes believe Flex is still Dead. When I inform them of all the great
stuff you guys have been accomplishing, they always get excited. Everybody
still loves Flex, it just hasn't been cool, hip, and trendy since HTML 5!!!
came
I thought it was the original intent to send to all committers.
You are right, the initial mail says to send out to all committers,
but then I got mistaken by the first sentence:
We've noticed that you have not contributed to the project in a while.
__
Excerpt from the initial
- Work have progressed on FlexJS to a point we are nearing creating a
first release
I think FlexJS is near first alpha release, maybe pointing to a first
release would be misleading.
I second this kind of email since it's a call to arms good for the
project. Maybe in the end it could have no
Hi,
I have added a few entries in .gitignore to ignore AIR-SDK related files (see
below)
so that I can overlay AIR-SDK in flex-sdk/ working directory and thus use it as
an IDE SDK.
None of these entries are currently in the sdk source, so it should be harmless.
Let me know if there is any
Hi,
Just another note from the security side of this.
The photo is optional (or can be of anything but most people have used an
actually photo of themselves) and the text doesn't need to contain any
personal information. I see this as a minimal risk especially as committer can
choose to
Hi,
As a lurker, I will just say that it's still rather scary to make an
official JIRA, or patch, or whatever the process is.
What's scary about it you just need to attach a fix to a JIRA. Hopefully it
will be reviewed and added to the SKD by a committer will and if all test pass
it will show
Hi,
So maybe we should remove the first sentence we have noticed you have been
doing nothing for a while
And maybe simply describe the situation and ask if people are still
interested in the project, and the areas where help is needed.
Maybe we should send to ALL committers, so that
Hi,
Yes, please delete swfobject from the repo.
Done.
The practice in the other repos is to only run RAT on the source package, not
the results after building
Done.
I think it in a state that usable to make a release candidate.
Justin
Good news.
I have just completed support for @media os-version for Android.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33949
Committed and pushed to develop.
I also added support for 3 part version numbers (such as 4.1.2).
The only constraint is that it needs to be quoted, or the mxmlc
Hi,
Please take a look RC1 of Apache Flex FlexUnit, try it out and provide some
feedback.
The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexunit/4.2.0/rc1/
The binary distributions as a convenience are available here:
Hi Team,
I'm working on list of easyfix issues and try to reproduce some of them.
For example today I've resolved this issue -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34057 because I couldn't
reproduce it, but I'm not convinced that is fully alright.
How should I proceed?
Should I just
HI,
For example today I've resolved this issue -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34057 because I couldn't
reproduce it, but I'm not convinced that is fully alright.
Did you try in the browser ie not AIR?
At the very least I'd paste the code you used to test the issue before
Great job Maurice! :)
I will check it tomorrow when nightly will be ready.
Btw. Where can I found some status of whether nightly was built or not?
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
https://builds.apache.org/job/flex-sdk/ = build
https://builds.apache.org/job/flex-sdk_release/ = nightly
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : piotrz [mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : dimanche 16 mars 2014 23:43
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: Building new skins for Android
Actually, you assumed that since it couldn't be reproduced, then it was fixed
in 4.12.
To be sure, I think you should install 4.11, reproduce the error, then test
again with 4.12, and check if it disappeared.
What do you think?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Justin Mclean
Hi Maxime,
thanks for pointing to the new component. As you said MTI doesn't support
LTR direction right now. At this point I think there's other features that
will IMO more needed (i.e: Mobile support). As I have no experience with
LTR text I don't know how needed is that feature, so at this
Hi,
Click on on of the build number to see what was included in that build.
For example https://builds.apache.org/job/flex-sdk_release/530/
Shows last changes were:
1. Script to copy RC into release area
2. don't touch locale in -config.xml and flex-description
Justin
I will reopen it and do some additional test in this case.
Thanks guys. now for me is much clear how to step with it.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
Thank you. :)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Building-new-skins-for-Android-4-x-and-iOS7-tp35848p35951.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
Hi,
Here's my second draft. It's now intended to be sent directly to all committers.
--- start draft ---
Hi Apache Flex Committer,
A lot has been going on in Apache Flex in recent months and it’s been hard to
keep up to date with all of the news.
Here's a brief overview of the current state
flex.apage.org ?
Typo...
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 8:28 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Draft email to committers
Hi,
Here's my second draft. It's now intended to be sent directly to all
On 3/16/14 8:48 AM, Michael A. Labriola labri...@digitalprimates.net
wrote:
Mike, I'm pretty sure in past threads I've asked you to work with Infra
directly by filing a JIRA. Can you do that? I think it would go more
smoothly if you worked directly with them.
Please feel free to send me that
Hi,
flex.apage.org ?
Yep :-)
Thanks,
Justin
On 3/16/14 7:56 AM, Maurice Amsellem maurice.amsel...@systar.com wrote:
Please try it yourself.
Ok, but I couldn't find in this thread a detaild description of the
issue. Could you please point me to the exact mail, and if none, describe
what needs to be tested.
Use the RC7 to install 4.12.
Hmm. I still don't like the first line. The it's been hardŠ assumes
that folks think it has been hard. Also, please propose a subject as well.
Maybe Apache Flex Progress Report?
How about for the first two lines:
A lot has been going on in Apache Flex in recent months. In case you
haven't
I think the note should be a call to action without comments on people's time
commitment or how hard it is to find time, etc. it is to be expected that
Committers will fade away and new ones replace old.
There is a reason that merit does not expire. We always welcome people back and
gladly.
Open a JIRA ticket at https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa
for the Infrastructure project. Tell them what you want to do and we'll see
what happens.
Thanks.
I will give it a whirl,
Mike
On 3/16/14 9:22 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
I think the note should be a call to action without comments on
people's time commitment or how hard it is to find time,
The initial draft was more like that but there were objections - so not
sure which is the best way
I tried adapting my ant script to run on FlexUnit.
It found that RAT said there are 4 binaries in the source kit. Font.fla,
font.swf, empty.swf and thumbs.db. I think there is an fla in the SDK, so
font.fla could stay as an exception, but we should look inside to see
what is in it. If it is
HI,
It found that RAT said there are 4 binaries in the source kit.
Thanks I'll look into those.
It also found that the NOTICE file is missing.
I'll add that.
Should flexunit's package name be apache-flex-flexunit-?
Sounds reasonable to me.
I wonder what is in flexunit1lib.swc? I couldn't
On 3/16/14 10:23 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
I wonder what is in flexunit1lib.swc? I couldn't find the source.
Anybody know where it is?
I's assume it Adobe's earlier version of FlexUnit?
OK, found it here: http://sourceforge.net/adobe/flexunit/wiki
Sounds like FlexUnit
67 matches
Mail list logo
