The problem roots in Adobe's determination, the web without Flash is not
that bad really, mobile is supporting 4k, Adobe lost its unique single
chance without even a try, I am moving on to JavaFx+Gluon,
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Deepak MS wrote:
> Thanks
Installer version 3.2.0 (windows)
Using Locale: en_US
Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI.
SDK version Apache Flex SDK 4.16.0
AIR version 25.0
Flash Player version 25.0
Creating Apache Flex home
Creating temporary directory
Downloading Apache Flex SDK from:
Thanks, Olaf.
Anyone has the latest AIR/Android( instead of 2.6 ) running in container?
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Olaf Krueger wrote:
> You find some approaches at docker Hub [1]
> Olaf
>
> [1] https://hub.docker.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
Anyone has AIR running in a Android/Windows/Mac container?
l technical issues and let those who want to
> >> try, try it. Some people think making Flex/FlexJS popular again is a
> long
> >> shot as well.
> >>
> >> I'm not that familiar with WebAssembly, but from what I've read today, I
> >> think Josh has hit on the mai
information.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Yang [mailto:flashflex...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 2:21 PM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: WebAssembly Flash ByPass
>
> 1) It takes a long time to make a powerful system like Flash
s so crazy here. Sorry, FlexJS will never give
> us
> > the performance we (Dedoose) need, so extending the life cycle of the
> flash
> > player a couple more years to buy us time for a complete rewrite in a
> > performant client technology is pretty important to us.
> &
No mean to be offensive, implementing everything in WebAssembly feels just
like talking about living in Mars, even with HTML/Javascript/CSS regardless
of performance, after so many years ...
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:18 PM, piotrz wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Please be
Yeah the life in Mars could be very exciting, let me know when you are
there ...
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Jason Taylor wrote:
> WebAssembly is officially supported in both Chrome and Firefox right now,
> and in the rest very soon.
> WebAssembly can take LLVM and
I tried a few times digging into Flex build, did not prepare enough time
and knowledge.
I feel like it could be a lot easier if it could be built with Gradle, is
it possible? how much effort could it be?
-Gary
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 5:28 AM, hferreira wrote:
> Hello,
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Clint M <cmod...@gmail.com> wrote:
> might be best to make this a new thread
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Gary Yang <flashflex...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I am curious, what do you guys think about Flash Player and Flash
I am curious, what do you guys think about Flash Player and Flash
Platform's situation today? is it better or worse than expected 5/6 years
ago?
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I'm not really paying much attention to webasm. Got too much to do right
>
HMTL needed more than 5 years, let's give WebASM 10.
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Jason Taylor wrote:
> So I'm sure many of you are aware that FireFox just added support for Web
> Assembly, Chrome should have it in the next release, and IE will be adding
> it shortly as
The high skilled workers have to be locked to one employer for close to 10
years, here is how you can help us:
http://www.petition2congress.com/17887/support-i140-ead
Locking the skilled ends up they try to keep a job instead of generating
value!
Thank you!
-Gary
I would say it is the topic Flash V.S. JS, it will never end until we split
into two groups where people can have their own belief.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Stephane,
Between Ray Kurzweil and Larry Flint you've gone off topic far and long
1) System like Flash can't be done by opensource community, and every
system comes to this complex, will have the same problem, HTML/JavaScript
do much worse, because they have more debt to pay off, for example,
websites made in 1999.
2) Every big bully wants to have there own environment,
and powerful independent product brand.
The questions are: Is there enough people standing for the product to
maintain such a huge technology? Will they do it for free? Are there ways
to ensure the product development costs?
2015-02-25 14:06 GMT-03:00 Gary Yang flashflex...@gmail.com:
1) System
I mean, with all these updates and changes from Apple, do you think Adobe
can catch up?
Oh, Please do NOT merge it into the SDK, IOC is not the only way to void
boilerplate, and Swiz is not the only way to IOC!
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Eric eh.fx...@gmail.com wrote:
That's a shame. I agree the entire framework might be a bit much, but
IoC/Dependency Injection,
just to bring this up...
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Gary Yang flashflex...@gmail.com wrote:
Java Spring is a very good example for framework evolving, for Flex, I
think it is the similar situation:
The key function is
1) Mxml
2)Binding
3)Data structure such as IList implementations
is present as well.
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Gary Yang flashflex...@gmail.com
wrote:
just to bring this up...
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Gary Yang flashflex...@gmail.com
wrote:
Java Spring is a very good example for framework evolving, for Flex,
I
think
I understand, maybe Javascript is the future, I am not against it, the
problem is now it is not working now.
when javascript is ready, what is the difference between actionscript and
javascript?
For complex UI system, it has to be based on OOP/Modularization, never the
syntax of a particular
Face the reality, the majority will mark their resume HTML5 developer after
Apple said No Flash on Ipad, even they do not know what it means.
the way I see it, Flex should fight with its advantages which is Flash
Platform. there are too many javascript frameworks already.
You can say
it had worked at one point for v4.11.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Gary Yang [mailto:flashflex...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 9:07 PM
To: aha...@adobe.com; dev@flex.apache.org
Cc: Greg Gordon
Subject: Could you help me with this weird problem when upgrading
Hi,
I am trying to upgrade a program to Flex 4.12.1, it has a error inside
DataGrid.as:
ReferenceError: Error #1069: Property sortCompareType not found on
mx.controls.dataGridClasses.DataGridColumn and there is no default value.
at
The same thing happens to :
mx.controls.advancedDataGridClasses.AdvancedDataGridColumn;
too.
-Gary
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Gary Yang flashflex...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to upgrade a program to Flex 4.12.1, it has a error inside
DataGrid.as:
ReferenceError: Error
I would expect they narrow Flash development into a very professional and
expensive platform.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Mark Saunders msaund...@bigredflame.com
wrote:
To further that point It feels like *Adobe* as a whole is for designers
and not developers.
-Original
Haven't heard much pop talk for a long time.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Jeffry Houser jef...@dot-com-it.com wrote:
There have been threads floating around about some big Flash related
announcement coming. One I saw said that this would knock the socks off
iOS devs. As best I can
Java Spring is a very good example for framework evolving, for Flex, I
think it is the similar situation:
The key function is
1) Mxml
2)Binding
3)Data structure such as IList implementations
on top of Mxml/Binding/Data is 1) UIComponent 2) Skinning 3)network
components
and then osmf,
Brainwashed iSheep!!! good one!!!
But Swift support Generics!! the sheep got some grass!
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:01 AM, f...@dfguy.us wrote:
So that guy is right in that it's still just as bad as a walled garden
with swift as anything else from Apple. I've never been a fan of Apple but
I
Define your AS4 please! is it just a set of features? why can't accomplish
them by upgrade AS3?
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:36 PM, jude flexcapaci...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't we make our own AS4 with Falcon? Or add the features we want to AS3
and call it AS4?
What does Falcon convert to? I
Hi all,
I am surprised that I have not seen any related topics.
Flex has been there for almost 10 years.
Flex4 has been there since 2009( right? before iOS )?
What do you think about its future?
What do you expect it to do?
Best,
-Gary
, Gary Yang flashflex...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am surprised that I have not seen any related topics.
Flex has been there for almost 10 years.
Flex4 has been there since 2009( right? before iOS )?
What do you think about its future?
What do you expect it to do?
Best
Opensource won't matter, because the core value is that end users trust
Adobe Flash Player, and they install it.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski nicho...@spoon.as
wrote:
Andrei,
There was a lengthy discussion at the 360|Flex conference a few weeks ago
about Adobe
Chris, You are right, I think it would be better to treat playerglobal
specially, it is the NOT opensource core of Flash platform. -Gary
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Christofer Dutz christofer.d...@c-ware.de
wrote:
I Just had a look at the code and it seems that the hard-coded name is
only
/provided which
should result in the same behaviour as defining it as normal compile
dependency and to handle it as external in the inside of the plugin and
to remove any special handling.
Chris
Von: Gary Yang flashflex...@gmail.com
Gesendet: Montag, 2
Hi,
I am reading
org.apache.flex.collections.ArrayList.as
I am confused about this private property:
/**
* @private
* Indicates if events should be dispatched.
* calls to enableEvents() and disableEvents() effect the value when
== 0
* events should be dispatched.
2 is a must have!!!
On Apr 17, 2014 6:32 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Please vote to accept the donation of the following Flex-related code and
documentation from Adobe Systems, Inc.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
-Alex
In the donation is:
1. Several
If binding refers to Flex data binding, I would say it is not the 1st
priority, because it is based on Actionscript, developers can even make the
same thing by ourselves.
But the worker debugger thing is totally inside Flash Player, which is not
open, we have to rely Adobe, so it should be the
Finally, this is great news indeed!
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Maurice Amsellem
maurice.amsel...@systar.com wrote:
No objection from me
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : carlos.rov...@gmail.com [mailto:carlos.rov...@gmail.com] De la part
de Carlos Rovira
Envoyé : mardi 8
This one is really 雪中送炭 which means giving coal to us when it snows
much!!
An updated version of the FDB debugger that contains support for ActionScript
Workers
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Adobe legal and business folks have approved the
Franck, I can not agree more! -Gary
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Franck Wolff frawo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering why there is no section about Flex related server solutions
such as BlazeDS, AMFPHP, FluorineFx, Red5, WebOrb and GraniteDS (I'm of
course especially interesting in
Hi,
Right now I see Flex compiler as a Flash compiler but with a Mxml to
Actionscript converting tool, when compile with Flex compiler, it will
convert mxml files into Actionscript file, and then call Flash compiler to
compile the generated actionscript files into files can be execute on Flash
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13565428#comment-13565428
]
Gary Yang commented on FLEX-33291:
--
I just checked out the source and encounter the same
44 matches
Mail list logo